213374U

"Most" as in 50(+1)%? And "a little" as in "I'd rather play other games than this one but I'd rather play this game that get my nuts caught in a meat grinder"? Such indefinition...

Then why do you keep replying? Just go be an attention whore elsewhere.

That's trolling. It's neither elegant, nor subtle or funny. Get the f*ck out. because you don't agree. oh, please, shut up newbie...

I should register over there. Looks like fun.

Who said peace is impossible? Peace with religious fundamentalists is impossible, because that's the definition of a fundamentalist. They won't settle for nothing less than the destruction of our culture. When they do, they will no longer be fundamentalists. No, you showed true cowardice by refusing to fight for your way of life. Non sequitur. I am not judging the validity of anyone's opinions based on their experiences. You, on the other hand, claim that suffering that experience prevents you from making rational choices. Your arguments were just flawed before, now you're not even making sense. Libya, Iran, Saudi Arabia... ring a bell? I'm sure you can dig up a few more. Do I really have to go step by step? Perhaps a crayon drawing would do the trick? Jeez. Your position won't save you from terrorist attacks. That is a fact. That however, has nothing to do with soldiers dying on terrorist attacks because they're an occupying force in a country that had nothing to do with terrorism to begin with. You know, deductive reasoning is not about making random assumptions and then linking those to even more random conclusions through impossibly convoluted arguments. You should go out and have some fresh air. You're not making ANY sense. Let's see. Our being able to understand their irrationality doesn't preclude the fact that they are impervious to reason. And say what you will, but children raised in hatred can't be turned just with good words. And I didn't say they're evil, please leave your straw men for somebody that will appreciate them. No. I said it will create more potential terrorists. But a willing terrorist without the means to attack is nothing. Dumb people always laugh when they don't understand something.

REAL WORLD - Battle of Stalingrad "Millions of forces" lol...

Not anyone. You, for instance, are not a coward. You're just retarded. 150k men could easily have been the difference between winning and losing. You're not even trying.

Yeah, yeah. And your dad can beat up my dad, too. No one cares, really.

You know, I once saw a video of some uber 1337 martial artist try to pull off that trick (or a similar one) on a Vale Tudo fighter. Thirty seconds later, the martial artist was lying on the floor with his knee impossibly bent. Fighting experience always wins against fancy moves. Add to that Tyson's strength, endurance and reflexes, and you get...

Yes, it's propaganda. The same progressist, do-nothing, it's-our-fault, ideals-alone-will-win propaganda that most politicians have been spouting for the last years. It's not only getting old, it's been proven a fallacy. Get some new stuff, you're making me sick. This is a violent world. Sometimes it comes down to kill or be killed. Deal with it. And about calling you names, well, I guess nobody likes to openly admit their cowardice. Ah, right. So you have the "proper frame of mind" now that you barely have an idea of what you're talking about, but if you experienced it first-hand, then you would not be able to make rational decisions. Please. Wow, you sure are a master at dodging the issue. You know which countries harbor and support islamic terrorism. Quit playing games. An ill-planned war that had nothing to do with terrorism, as you have admitted yourself. Any other non sequitur you wish to make? Another non sequitur. What, are you getting tired or is it just that the feeble grasp you had on reality is finally giving up? Your previous statement was based on the assumption that islamic terrorists can be discouraged, by showing them they can't win. However, religious fanaticism isn't rational, because it's based on belief. This means that any logical reasons you may give them aren't going to work - they kill because they feel it's their holy duty to do so. This has nothing to do with logic and reason not being able to provide a solution for the problem. Keep trying, but not too hard. I wouldn't want you to hurt yourself and report me because of it. It's not a matter of revenge. It's a matter of self-defense. And while attacking them may generate more potential terrorists, they will have no way of comitting terrorist acts if we do our part well enough. As for the part of them seeing such and such, read above. Oh, and as a side note, that whole paragraph is a big contradiction. Great job. Losing Stalingrad would have shattered the Red Army. That is a widely accepted statement. If it wasn't for the Americans opening a second front in Africa, Germany would have had enough troops to take Stalingrad and the rest of the USSR would have fallen into line. Oh, wait. That's in the real world. In Nur Ab Sal's Wonder World, I don't know how the war went. That's trolling. It's neither elegant, nor subtle or funny. Get the f*ck out.

No. They'd probably suffer sanctions from some countries, but the US can't afford to put China under blockade, lest they want to risk economic collapse. It wouldn't be such a big deal.

No, I'm not suggesting it. But can you ensure the Chinese wouldn't do it if they were the constant target of terrorist attacks, as Israel is?

Right. That's why flyweight champions always beat the sh*t out of heavyweights. Boxers are used to both withstanding and dodging blows. And just one hook from Tyson would probably break a few bones to anyone without a comparable muscular mass. So... yeah.

They don't attack China because they know the Chinese would retaliate. They don't attack Argentina or Brasil because they are not the ones running the world. Your point?

Now you're just diverting the attention... Who's spouting propaganda now? And thankfully for the western civilization, some people have what it takes to do what's necessary, unlike you. You don't want to fight for your way of life? That's fine, someone else will. You forget that that freedom of choice you seem to take for granted was paid for in blood. And it will undoubtedly take blood to keep. Don't you dare question the way your safety and your so vaunted freedom is granted to you, when you are not willing to fight for it yourself, you coward. Keep closing your eyes to reality. I suspect you'll only open them when they have to pick someone dear to you from the streets with a teaspoon. You are wrong. You can destroy the enemy, in the form of the governments that support terrorism. End of story. And defending oneself is not an extremist ideology, as any lawyer will tell you. Beautiful. Unfortunately, your ideals will not protect you from shrapnel. A reasoning based on the wrong premise that a terrorist is a rational being. Fanaticism isn't rational. They don't seek to "win". They only seek to kill as many of us as they can. And according to you, the thing to do is let them? To quote other poster here "Are you sick or just perverted?"

No.

No, I have a pretty good joystick and I still fly with the keyboard. Trying to use the mouse when maneuvering aircraft is a surefire way to crash, though. Keyboard-only controlled aircraft for teh win!

You keep searching. Meanwhile, people are dying. That kind of weakness is what they prey upon. Only because it hasn't been implemented to its fullest extent. Only because people like you still have reservations. Only because some refuse to acknowledge that this is war, and it's not any country that it's being attacked. It's our culture. Reality and facts disagree with you. The ones he used to murder tens of thousands of kurds.

Well, we know that sometimes Eru posts naked, but man, posting nude with puppies is just wrong.

That's dialectical rubbish. Either you support democracy, freedom, and the western way of life, or you don't. There's no middle ground. If you think SW is suitable as a moral beacon, you need to grow up and look around. Right. It's our fault. We had it coming all along.

No.

I don't have a problem with No-CD patches. I use them myself all the time. But asking for one at the very game's developer boards? Are you THAT dense?

Occam's razor says that there is no conspiracy.

That's not what SP was talking about. You can't get every single one of them without commiting genocide. And that is obviously not acceptable. But you can minimize their operative capacities by shutting down the governments that support them. As long as there is violence there will be terrorism, and violence is a natural tendency of man.