213374U

Obviously he's used to having big guns in his pants.

What for? There's no PvP here*, you know. (*) Well, there is, but levels have no effect in deathmatches whatsoever...

Great. I'll be trying this one out as soon as they get it at my local rental.

Yeah, I read that one. Thought it was pretty ingenious, but I was like 15 at the time. " With relation to that: Omega Point theory, Sci-fi or actual science?

A gaffi stick. An elegant weapon for a more civilized time. Eh, wait a second...

He can't. He's become a total forumaholic. We've all been through that at some point. "

I voted for her.

Well, I have no idea who most of those are, but I sure as hell know who is hotter*. (*) As in stereotipically voluptuous

AvP2: Survival, Horror, Sci-fi. A true classic. What about Cold Fear? You guys tried it?

You better believe it. In fact it's one of the few games I have ever uninstalled without beating it. I had to do so based on the realization that I could become effectively addicted to such a level of suckage.

Well, the game concept is not exactly the same, it's only similar. Artwork is quite different, too. And the mission/combat part of the game sucks horribly due to pacing, controls, camera/perspective layout and unbalanced difficulty. Not to mention the absurdly retarded AI. Other than that, it's OK.

Not really. It's more like a bunch of smart devs trying to take advantage of the X-Com franchise with their UFO wannabe products.

Fix'd.

I feel your pain.

No, it's not. It's the sequel to UFO: Aftermath. A bloody awful game if I may say so.

I'm not even remotely interested in like 95% of those... And other games I'm interested in like Hammer and Sickle weren't featured at the E3. Damn, it's becoming more and more difficult to tell good games from mediocre ones with so many being produced each year.

Oh. May I ask where did you get your degree in nutrition? You know, I didn't make all that stuff up. And I haven't seen that film either. I just read.

No.

It must suck to be a vegan.

Not for long, anyway...

Impressive, but... Harry Potter for 100 consecutive hours? Isn't that against the Geneva conventions or something? :ph34r:

Perhaps whoever sticky'ed this thread could explain his reasons for doing so?

No. No amount of physical exercise would be enough to offset the caloric supply of a diet consisting of daily McD's food. You don't see bodybuilders or other athletes eating at McD's. And the physical exercise can't do anything about the cholesterol that will turn your arteriae into waste dumps.