213374U

Well, I liked it. And I rented the DVD less than a month ago, so I guess there's your DVD release.

Also: Foamhead 1 - Nurbs 0

It's a GREAT idea. But the present model of Constitution is pure sh!t. Let's just hope they can do better next time.

Oh. Sorry, but in battle, civilians are only a nuisance. Untrained and ill-equipped personnel are not helpful in the battlefield, and their slaughter will only contribute to decrease the moral of the army they are supposed to support. And most high-speed ordnance (such as the one fired by AK-47s) can pierce civilian models of kevlar, so... yeah. No amount of tactics is going to change the fact that you can't take down a fighter with your handgun. If civilian partisans were effective fighting forces, there would be no need to maintain a dedicated army. It's that simple. Whatever. I just hope you open your eyes before a bullet opens them for you.

Useful Info #14: A dictator couldn't succeed another dictator in Europe or the US because presently there are no dictators in those places. " And yeah, I vote whenever I can.

Yeah. Roll your eyes. But pray that your superior officer has more common sense than you.

Eh. He had some popular support. And he succeeded the previous dictator, IIRC. Something similar couldn't happen in the US or Europe. Yeah. Your reliable Colt against the enemy's attack helicopters, cruise missiles, fuel-air explosives and most importantly: KEVLAR. But fear not, for you know the terrain! Oh, wait. They have GPS.

This "legal" or "illegal" war stuff I find pretty amusing. Amusing in a sad, absurd sense. To think that just because a bunch of morons dressed in expensive suits approve of it, a war becomes any more legitimate is just stupid.

Yes, I guess it's better than nothing at making you a target. It's better than nothing at giving a soldier an excuse to shoot you. Other than that, I don't see how small caliber weaponry in the hands of untrained personnel can do any good against a well equipped and trained military force. The government can't just "become too powerful". There are laws to prevent that, and if those laws are broken, whoever is responsible may be prosecuted. Totalitarian regimes are always supported by a large segment of the population (if only at first). You don't want the gov't to have too much power? Don't support a power-hungry megalomaniac and you should be just fine. )

My mistake. It's interesting that they didn't submit it to referendum. Perhaps they knew what would happen... "

Ahh... damn. How could I forget Bloodlines.

Do you really think that small caliber guns are a threat to a well equipped military force? And why the hell should you need to be ready to overthrow the very government you have supported in the first place? Civilians shouldn't be allowed to have functional guns. There's no justification for it. If you want to shoot things, get into the army or the police. They are always in need of more people.

Heh. I'd actually like to see them try with the opposition of France and (perhaps) Germany. Hey, perhaps the new European Union will be led by Turkey! (w00t)

Can't tell you how happy that makes me.

Of course not. I love his creative talent, his vision, and his creations. But his directing skills are probably his weak spot. That doesn't mean I could do better, or most people could for that matter. It takes a lot of work and skill to create something as outstanding as SW. But if anything, he could probably benefit from a few pointers from others in the trade.

No, you don't. You just say that "poverty and stuff" should be eradicated, but you don't really give any specific solutions to terrorism. That's the same stuff everyone would wish was true in a perfect world, but that is just that, wishful thinking. I thought we had already gone over this. Their might gives them the right. The US have worked their way to the top. Nobody gave them anything for free. They are today's "Roman Empire", with everything that entails. You don't like it? Then get into politics and try to make your country an alternative. But no, all you people do is whine and moan about how Evil the US are.

And those horrible, horrible close-ups during lightsaber fights...

War might not be the way to fight the terrorists, but I don't see you offering a better alternative. Sorry, but what we have came at the cost of bloody wars and revolutions. If the rest of the world can't keep up, it's a shame, but that doesn't give them the right to point the finger at us and use it as an excuse for terrorism.

Not for me. I can't bear the thought of ever being wrong, and that's why I hold no beliefs, at all. "

No. The war is officially over. The democratically elected Iraqi government is not in a state of war with the US. No amount of criminals trying to sabotage the democratic process is going to change that.

Isn't stupidity an opinion, too? As per usual, you have failed to write a coherent post. (Didn't I tell you to let your dog write your posts for you?)

"Shock and Awe" could indeed be considered a terrorist doctrine. However, war (as in an army against another) always has had a strong psychological component. I'm not sure every tactic aimed at decreasing the enemy morale is terrorism, but I suppose that depends on the standpoint. But at any rate, the war's over.

Terrorista es el que utiliza el terror como instrumento, sean cuales sean los fines. En algunos casos el terror est

WC2 Observation Lounge feat. Maj. "Jazz" Colson at the piano! WC2 Kilrathi Theme. Those were the days... :cool: