Gorgon

The theory is that this private investigator hacked the phone right ?, not that a journalist told him to do it. I guess it all comes down to what he was expected to to do, whether those expectations were stated or not.

Playing through it now. It would have been so much better if you had the option of re spending all your talent points at level up. Maybe once per 4 levels ?. You get tired of the same build and want to try out the other spells. With all their talk of it being more streamlined you would think they would actually streamline something meaningful, but no. Other than that, pretty standard fare, a whole lot of area recycling. Seen one cave seen them all.... literally. I'll give it a 6.5/10. It has its moments.

I usually perform violence on the keyboard.

My usual reaction to Microsoft Excel, despite having used it on a daily basis for years.

Dragon age 2. It's not so bad. Terrible acting here and there, but still enjoyable. And my mage walks everywhere naked since the undressed state diaper is now a thong.

Didn't like it either. Maybe it was the experience points popping out of beaten enemies like a Mario game, maybe the endless unskipable cut scenes, maybe the lack of proper key remapping. Looked really very pretty though.

I just signed up 2 weeks ago. I don't use it for nothin' per se, other than when it's practical for events and communication. I've checked it twice this week, people should should learn to shut up unless something interesting to ME is going on in their lives.

So true, Hitman series wins hands down, first you go in quietly and when you make a mistake which you are bound to the first few times, all hell breaks loose and you fight to survive. It's like ASCreed cut out half the experience.

Well if the shoe fits. Kids.

Halo is completely unplayable (Halo 1 anyway) and it's a mystery to science why it ever got as popular as it did, give me a recent example.

What I mean to say is that the lousy aiming on controllers influenced gameplay developments towards hiding behind crates, and that that gave us a generation of games that all look alike and play alike, that's worst case scenario, there are plenty of exceptions to the rule though.

Do you disagree that cover mechanic shooters practically all look and feel alike ? I want this game to be good, I really do, and I think the chances are decent, but there is the ever present problem of the lousy aiming on controllers, so you have to think of something else for the firefights. More often than not, that doesn't go much further than crouching behind crates for the duration.

So, to sum up : Hide behind cover mechanics (proudly turning every game into the same boring experience since 2008), not much exploration, yet somehow it might magically still be good.

Nice rack

Fairness is not a human right, it's one of the cornerstones of a welfare society we can't presently afford, but that people understandably have come to expect and rely on.

It's not about human rights, that was just the way to pursue this through the courts. I thought we covered this already.

It's all about resources right from the beginning, a stable home environment with prepare you, and the lack of one hamstring you. This conservative cannon nonsense about everyone deserving their place, I can't believe anyone buys into that.

Force everyone through an education, whether vocational or otherwize, by cutting them off welfare if they don't.

This is about giving everyone the same opportunity to shine, not about lowering standards, in theory at least that should create more success stories out of the whole than if only the privelidged have access to higher education. This long term investment is absolutely necessary in a modern information society, unless you want to start competing for manual labour jobs with the Chinese.

Well, we can decide to fight against determinism for idealistic reasons, in fact in many areas we do, and if we didn't we would lose out on a whole lot of talent.

If there was a 'fairness in education' law, I'm sure that's what they would have been using, the wording in human rights statutes is neccessarily pretty open and vauge by comparison since it needs to incompass any number of imaginable abuses.

We don't have a law for every crime or injustice, you take what's available in ye olde book of laws and make your way from there.

I don't see any real relevance in what statute they are trying to make their case under. Did they somehow soil efforts towards advancing human rights.... No.

No, and indeed children of well educated well off people generally turn out that way themselves, the opposite for the poor. One might well argue that education should be on the merits, and not be decide on whether daddy is able to pay the tuition for the university with a name that guarantees a higher level of access. If your parents are poor and uneducated you are already up against it, not having well functioning support network. I generally support the notion of trying to level the field as much as possible. The actual problem here is that England is broke, not that you want to discriminate more than you already do, but the effect is much the same.

I suspect the effect will be to reduce gibs, like that rental service did with their own cut of Saving Private Ryan. I wonder why the people behind this push are not worried that cleaning up the aesthetics of the violence will make it more easy for people to become desensitized, not less.