Pidesco

Armored Princess is much better balanced, harder, more open ended, varied, has less repetitive fights, and has dinosaurs.

Hours of AP this year: 106.2 hrs (All in January, I believe) Be afraid.

It's very, very addictive, quite funny in a weird way, repetitive, a bit unbalanced and overly linear. Play as a mage. Armored Princess is much better and equally addictive.

VAT in Europe.

Burning hate.

It would be awesome if Thorton came to Lisbon.

The thread looks so cozy.

Except the game comes out in May.

Is that the PC release date, as well?

You might want to correct the article's title.

It can be both.

Looking Glass Studios.

A Bukowski option would be interesting.

Built in webbrowser is just evil. It means I will never stop playing Civ 5. Ever.

The problem with voiced protagonists in RPGs is mainly one of resources. Voice work costs money, and if you decided to voice the PC, the tendency will be automatically to limit the different dialogue options and to shorten each response. Imagine if Fallout had a fully voiced prtagonist, for example.

More St Vincent this time in the form of an incredible Beatles cover.

This is unexpected.

Ubisoft: "Don't buy our game. Please!"

I have a 9800GT (meaning a 8800GT), which cost me 100

There's only one Portuguese guy at the Winter Olympics. He participated in this event.

Is this torture too? I've given baths to cats by hand, and they usually react like those cats inside the box.

I wouldn't say obsolete, but 4 did introduce certain benefits I can't live without, nowadays. Even if I spent more time with Civ 1 than with any other Civ. Still, there are a lot more game design differences between each Civ game than between Painkiller and Doom. Mainly because Painkiller and Doom's systems are much, much simpler.

I have played both. I finished Doom, even. They are not completely different experiences. Completely different experiences would be, say, Myst and Civilization. Other than for nostalgia's sake, I'll probably never play Doom again.

How is it different?