pmp10
Members-
Posts
1032 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by pmp10
-
Today there isn't one. Used to be that the way stats were driving the gameplay was defining RPGs. That's why too many options would result in a strategy game or maybe a tactical-rpg. The original formula got boring with it's limited interactivity and so we use the term for almost every game where numbers can be seen.
-
Thats not a bad post of one definition of an RPG but I want to add to it. An RPG must allow you do adopt a certain playing style of your choice. How could you Role Play if the game doesn't allow this? You can call them that even when playing a preset role. You always have limitations imposed on who your character is and what they would do. Especially in older RPGs that didn't allow for major character alteration and offered no meaningful choices.
-
So not only is the game years away but Epic has learned nothing from shootmania. Expecting a comity of nostalgic gamers to do a good design job by steadily working for months doesn't seem particularly bright.
-
This wasn't organized and may not really matter much in the grand scheme of things. Intervening on account of Odessa implies you will take your power to Odessa. That could be too far even by Russian standards.
-
And what does 60000 casual hat-collectors have to do with hardcore twitch-shooters?
-
Epic teases new Unreal Tournament. I really wish it would sell today but twitch-shooter formula has died for a reason.
-
Interesting thing about the new continuity is that they declared everything EU defunct. Including still ongoing things like Old Republic. I wonder if EA won't force them to change their mind about that.
-
Historically marriage was less about social pressures and more about economy. Transfer of property has always been absolutely vital in making the wealth of families. Modern times simply reversed the cost/benefit ratio of marriage. Today you are more likely to lose property in a divorce than gain anything substantial. And unlike in the past rising children costs a fortune but produces little benefits. The only thing that awaits us in the future are state-run reproduction programs.
-
"United States' claims at being a democracy seriously threatened"
pmp10 replied to JadedWolf's topic in Way Off-Topic
But people are in control of their destinies more than ever before. The same wonders of globalization that cut the ties between citizens and their government allow us today to find different places to live in. If people are not willing to make a simple change of residency then they are not going to become reformers or revolutionaries. -
This is getting ridicolous, again i agree with you. Has an EULA even ever been a case in a court? EULAs were in court a few times. The cases that went to trial usually involved cheaters and hackers. IIRC the verdicts were all over the place.
-
I think you mean Russian.
-
Not only that but we would need to use a planet for the sheer mass/energy required to form a stable wormhole going somewhere/somewhen. But then it's not like anybody would really miss Saturn anyway. That's essentially impossible due to enormous amount of supplies required. Unless you give up on humans and do away purely with machines. But if you are willing to do that then why not just settle for Mars instead?
-
Interesting opinion piece on the feelings from the Kiev side of things. What's pretty striking is that Kiev government likely expected western aid in holding down the East. No matter the scale of EU/US commitment that was never going to happen. While the west did little to help the key reasons Ukraine has failed were lack of resolve and leadership in Kiev.
-
That's a terrible example as direct result of that was the start of second world war which resulted in fall of the third reich. It makes perfect sense not to go that far. Stopping somewhere around Munich seems like the ideal course.
-
Are they really made to look so terribly stupid? Nobody but a handful of extremists want to see any serious western intervention. New Ukrainian government will receive enough loans not to go under immediately and long term they even have a small shot at breaking out of Russian grip. Given the political situation I don't see how much more good could have been done. The worst thing to come out of this so far is the spread of political cynicism and apathy as western voters see their politicians waste time on empty rhetoric.
-
Following GDC Sterling went on a rant regarding freemium naming practices. Don't get it myself. He is just arguing semantics.
-
Well yes. Some of those games listed have been actively hampered by their very own developers. Blizzard lawsuits over rights to Starcraft/Brood War TV transmissions in Korea or fighting tooth-and-nail for ownership of DotA are best examples.
-
The problem is that it's not entirely true. Starcraft 1 became a 'e-sport' by accident. The game was never meant to be played the way it would be by the competitive community. Point 2 and 3 are mods not sponsored by developers. 'E-sports' today is more of a result of accidents than conscious decision by any developer. That is has gotten a little more popular is purely due to internet finally allowing video streaming.
-
Nobody will accept Ukraine into EU in its current shape. It would take years of work before that state will be stable enough to be a candidate for EU or NATO. There is no way to know if it won't self-destruct, go bankrupt or swing back to Moscow within that time.
-
I wouldn't be so certain about that. Certainly there will be a lot of condemnations to start with but everyone knows that Crimea is a lost cause. New borders may be recognized as soon as media grow bored and find another topic.
-
I agree. Except that it is USB/PS2/COM/LPT/gender switch.
-
If there was a serious alternative to Russian gas then eastern Europe would jump on it long ago. The reality is that about half of Europe simply cannot uncouple itself from Russian energy exports without ruining their economies.
-
While the referendum is a forgone conclusion this would be too obvious even by Moscow standards.
-
That 'protect you' part was just for the sake of courtesy. No sane superpower would trust Ukraine with nuclear arsenal and especially not at the time. There was never any way for them to hold on to it.
-
You can't seriously think that anyone would hold a honest referendum on this issue? Neither side would accept unfavorable outcome anyway.