WorstUsernameEver

With the exclusion of the Big Town/Little Lamplight quest, all of the quests you cited are generally longer than the typical FO:NV quest. Granted, I prefer FO:NV's design, but I don't think Fallout 3's quests are as bad as you guys make them to be, not by any stretch. Even Vince D. Weller praised them, and there's a reason. than the "typical" new vegas quest sure, but you're overlooking the fact that if NV has 100 quests, and 80 are short, and 20 are long, thats still 10x more quests and content than in F3, which has 20 long quests, and no short ones. (note: numbers are made up) if you're saying that you wish new vegas had less quests, so that the long ones stood out better, fine, but thats not what most people wanted in a new game. I just wished the balance was skewed in favor of more involved quests. Less quests but longer overall. I'm still pretty pleased with the game quests but I think they can still improve.

With the exclusion of the Big Town/Little Lamplight quest, all of the quests you cited are generally longer than the typical FO:NV quest. Granted, I prefer FO:NV's design, but I don't think Fallout 3's quests are as bad as you guys make them to be, not by any stretch. Even Vince D. Weller praised them, and there's a reason.

My ass Here's a better quality link

This seemed like the most appropriate thread to post this in so... Destructoid: Exclusive Lucas Montbarron Trailer Environments, as always, look gorgeous. EDIT: I guess we can expect one of these every Thursday?

I somewhat agree. There's plenty of good quests who are marred either by a disingenuous use of the engine (making you trek through areas with a lot of loading screens) and some quests who just are too thin on content. That said, many quests were entertaining for their writing at least the first time, and the way they intertwine makes them more bearable than the usual fetch quest. But I definitely longed for meatier sidequest, a-l

I think that all of those look pretty cool. I like all of the designs and honestly, while there are some low poly/low textures spots which are kinda the bane of the game's look, but then again, it's quite obviously meant to be played top-down, and from the gameplay videos shown, it has a lot of enemies on screen, with great lighting and a smooth framerate, so it was a good choice overall. Not to mention it doesn't have loading screens.

I pushed a button and changed my avatar. But did something awesome happen? Y/N

I joined last year. Also I'd be hard pressed to call NeoGAFfers and goons people that are only interested in games that look spectacular and are either made by Rockstar or Blizzard, but whatever, dude. Also, if the audience Obsidian aims is that of people that liked the Dark Alliance games and their fans, then the sales are going to be disappointingly small. I'm not saying the game is going to be bad, but it was an hybrid, and it's difficult for hybrid to hit the sweet spot. So far, signs point at Obsidian not hitting it.

Worstusername please please please change that avatar pic, it's freaking me out. Don't you see? He pressed a button and something awesome happened

URWLified uses lighting/color settings similar to the UWRL mod, which has been taken down by the Nexus since the author was banned for a mistake. Overall, I prefer it to the original version, even if sometimes it IS quite saturated.

Aaaah young lovers...

I honestly find the alternate history one of the most fun part of the Fallout setting. SCIENCE is inherently more fun than the 80s.

@LC: Are you using the normal or URWLified version? Regardless, if you're bothered by the colors/saturation you should really grab the Imaginator. It lets you play with the image pretty much as you like, colors, saturation, contrast, brightness, it has some cool presets, configurable shutter speed and soft focus etc.

Gotta wonder, again, what the audience for the game is supposed to be. It's an hybrid that doesn't seem to be hitting the sweet spot for anyone, and I've encountered more than once people on forums being turned off from the news that came out about the game and warning other gamers to ignore it. It's looking very grim for Obsidz.

Fair enough. Most of the impressions I've read said "cheap and not at the level of the other Mass Effect 2 DLCs" so I won't buy it unless they make a super-cheap sale, so I read MrBrown's spoilers. Disappointing.

Frog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kreia R00fles! But seriously, I don't see how you could consider him a doppelganger by any stretch, but I guess that a character with an animal and a human form would be cool (I'm perfectly aware that Frog was just a Frog, but yeah, I can't really think of anything else that would fit with the "similar to a Chrono Trigger" character.. a robot maybe? I mean the Dungeon Siege games apparently have robots).

Huh, what?! I don't know where he got the "Bethesda as a publisher" but funcroc speculated that Obsidian might be doing Wasteland 2 because Brian Fargo is followin Feargus and Avellone's twitter. Kind of a flimsy connection but yeah.

Metacritic stops scoring developer careers. Luckily.

EDIT: ...not really sure what happened. I presume my browser/net ****ed up somehow.

But there's no doppelganger in Chrono Trigger. ಠ_ಠ

Why is it not worth it? What are the problems with it? Does it bridge Mass Effect 2 decently to Mass Effect 3 at least? Are there any important plot points in it? No spoilers please.

Talking about Bioware and NeoGAF: Next GameInformer cover is Mass Effect 3?

Arcade, Boone, Veronica and Cass have the involved companion's quest. The best companion's quest is hands-down Arcade's, but all of those are decent overall.

Yes it is. And I don't see how it looks terrible by any stretch, to be honest.