Dark Moth

Hmm...I believe, though, that if you don't get your last part from Vogga (which is what I did first time) you get a whole lightsaber instead. I got my last part on Dantooine, if I remember correctly. Partly because that planet is shorter.

Unfortuantely, combat can warp the minds of even seemingly-moral people. So gunning down an injured soldier during combat may not be something that soldier would do anywhere else. But I do agree it shouldn't be done. Regardless, we must also not forget the way these same people treat our prisoners. (torture, beheadings, etc.) And, of course, the fact that they purposely target civilians as well.

And now for some art of my own. The nihilus/exile pic is finally done and colored! And I shrunk it a little bit so it's easier to see. Hope you like it!

Hooray! Well done, SOE. Hope the well project goes well, too. See, metadigital? Christians can be good people. And that is what we are all about. (waits for him to start flaming)

Dang... I still can't help thinking of Monty Python. Old man: "What is your favorite color?" Sir Galahad: "Blue. No, yell-aaaauuuughhh!" [is thrown into fiery pit] I'd say blue is my second favorite color. Still like orange, though.

:D I heard if you complete the game without pissing Kreia off, it restores all the cut content. That's why no one seems to have gotten it, yet.

I'm just hoping that new recruit will help dig the Penguins out of their ditch. Mario just isn't what he used to be, and I think he's not doing our team much good currently.

Thanks, 6FIR. And now for more female pictures: Kate Beckinsale looks a little like Bastila, yes? Kelly Hu. Jessica Simpson is so hawt!! Even if she has the brains of a piece of cheese.

T3 helped me fight Visas, too! I was fighting her and then he comes in and starts blasting her. BTW, did anyone else notice that when you fight the slavers in the Ebon Hawk on Nar Shadaa a lab station appears in the medbay, but for the rest of the game there is no lab station? Is this a glitch, or did Obsidian mean for that to happen?

Actually, the bible does teach against homosexuality. And it is one of the more minor of sins. And we can't single out homosexuals as sinners, because we are all sinners. It's just one of the issues that tend to create more controversy these days.

I know that, I was referring to him supervising the KJV's translation into English. (although I should have phrased that better) Look at my post more carefully and you'll see that I said it wasn't the first english Bible. And I could argue with you if I want, but I knew that would get me nowhere and decided to ignore your flaming instead. So far you've both misinterpreted me and put words into my mouth. But that's okay, I've made my case already. And seriously, Meta, read the Bible for once and you'll find that it does teach against homosexuality.

:cool: [eating popcorn] That's some quality flaming, metadigital! Keep it up!!

Great, Julianw. Couldn't have said it better myself. That's what I'm driving at. My whole philosphy is simply this: I don't agree with you, but I still respect you. @Alanchu: I know, actually I meant it that it's not a normal instinct. Sorry, I should have phrased that differently. But as Lucius said, there's really no point in continuing this argument anyway. Guess I'll have to ignore Metadigital's trolling when it comes.

Just don't forget, the KJV is not the "official" Holy Bible, nor was it even the first English bible. it's just one popular version among many. King James merely supervised the translation of the Bible into English. Also, the Bible is a collection of books written by many different authors over hundreds of years. In fact, the original languages of the OT were Hebrew/Aramaic while the NT was originally in Greek. If you already know that, then my bad. And thank you for arguing in a non-abusive manner. See, metadigital? It's not so hard.

Well, once you learn the difference between race and lifestyle, I'll get back to you. And I'm not discriminating against them. Look up discrimination in your beloved online-dictionary. I don't treat homosexuals any differently. Crap, I know some in real life. I don't hate them or treat them any differently than I would a straight person. That would be being bigoted; that would be discriminating . All I merely stated in the first place was that I disagree with it, and suddenly that makes me a bigot, racist, zealot, narrow-minded person, nazi, whatever you want to call me. I disagree with polygamy, too. Does that make me a bigot or racist or hypocrite? Nice to see you're so mature you have to call people names. To quote what you told me once "you resorted to the last bastion of the illiterate: the insult". And I never called them dirty or confused. You're putting words into my mouth, oh-so-mature metadigital. Please leave if you can't argue in a mature fashion or stop insulting others whom you disagree with. Crap, now you're discriminating against me cause I'm a Christian. You can't seem to tolerate people of differing opinions. Hypocrite.

Well, if God created this world, created his rules and laws, gave us our very lives, and is omnipowerful, than I guess I would be compelled to obey his rules, I guess. Even though I'm not that good at it. The three O's of God for Christianity, Islam, and Judaism are: Omniscient (all-knowing) Omnipresent (everywhere) Omnipowerful (all-powerful) To quote the Bible: Even the foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of man. (basically that's what it says)

Well, I'm sure you do things that hurt no one that people disagree with it. The same situation applies here. I disagree with it, and since I do happen to believe in God, I disagree with Lucius's statement. And I'm not a conservative Bible-thumper either. But you see, that is what this is here: a clash of beliefs. And it's really pointless to argue here any further, cause we're not going to change each others' beliefs here anyway. Edit: Actually, I take it back cause arguing is what this thread is here for. Gotta love these controversial threads.

Do you know if your influence with Visas drops, does Handmaiden start talking to you again?? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I've heard that she still won't talk to you. It's never happened to me, so I don't know for sure. But I think once she stops talking to you, it's for good. You got that right , they should obviously share the Exile it will make them and especially him happy if you know what i mean. " :ph34r: <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agreed.

Well, that's not how I define "natural". And you can't say that human beings aren't meant for any of those things. It's natural for humans to develop technologies to better themselves and ensure their suvival. That is one of our instincts of self-preservation and species-preservation (that is also granting we don't destroy the planet in the process). Sexual relations is a different thing. Instead of saying "it's not natural" I should have said that it is not an agreeable mindset, in my opinion. And I am not going to stop homosexuals from living their lives. I merely stated in the first place that I disagreed with it. Is that a crime? This is not much different than, say, if I disagreed with someone's politics. I am merely disagreeing with what some see as acceptable and others don't.

I think it only happens if you have more influence with Visas than Handmaiden. If you have a decent amount more of influence with Visas, then you get a cutscene with them aruing. If you have way more influence with Visas than Handmaiden, you get a different cutscene and Handmaiden stops talking to you. Women.

I know. 'Tis a crime.

Even if you disregard consent, it still would be considred immoral. Why? Because of the age difference and the skewing of social standards. Even if you exclude the example of adultxchild relations, you cannot argue that men were ever meant to have sex with other men; the same goes for women. It is not natural. That is why I disagree with same sex relations. It is a particular lifestyle I am not comfortable with, but that does not mean I am bigotted or hateful towards them. I am sure you might disagree with the way some people live, but you don't persecute them or discriminate against them.

Well, I misinterpreted your question. Granted, the child is not always unwilling, (although the vast majority is) I've read about a 12 year old girl who routinely had sex with older men willingly (before she was tragically killed) The point I'm making is if something supposedly unnatural is okay, where do you draw the line? How do you know what's okay and what's not? You can't always say love justifies everything, because Michael Jackson apparently loved those young boys yet it would still be considered unacceptable, regardless if they were willing or not.

Since I'm sure you had me in mind, I'll answer this for you. Well, when you believe a 2000 year-old book is divinely inspired, then yes you do tend to obey what it says. Besides, if it's okay for a man to love a man (and I mean passion love, not brotherly love), then would you say it's okay for a man (or woman) of mature age to love a young boy or girl? Michael Jackson would certainly agree. Are you seriously comparing Homosexuality to Pedophilia? Are you aware of the difference between two adults having consensual sex, and one adult having sex with someone who does not have the ability to consent? If it's okay for a man to love (and in this case I mean love in the having sex sense) a woman, then would you say it's okay for a man (or woman) to love another man or woman against their will? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Many gay people end up going straight. Some people might think they're gay or straight, only to turn out not being that way. Granted, it's not that way for all of them. Of course it's not okay for someone to love someone against their will, but in this case, it's choosing the path that is more gratifying. @ Lucius: If you believe in God and that God is eternal and that the Bible is his/her/its word, then of course you would obey the entity that created the Earth. I am not a conservative Christian, I'm more moderate, but I still hold to many of the lessons taught by the Bible.

What I just want to know is why the giant pink bunny hates K2 and doesn't even want to see K3 yet keeps contributing to this thread? The way things are going right now, the fans would just be better off making K3 themselves. It'd probably leave a lot more people satisfied.