Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The slow motion space chase was silly, but Star Wars has always been pretty silly. 

 

DueyZyQ.gif

 

 

I actually really like the Kylo and Ren dynamic. There were basically three movies happening in TLJ, and the Luke-Ren-Kylo relationship was easily the most interesting and had the best acting. But really, it's space fantasy. I've said it before, take it way less seriously people. :p

I dunno, there's silly and then there's just stuff you can't buy in universe. Such as why does a capital ship need to provide cover for starfighters. Especially after two of them near decapitated the Rebel fleet.

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Posted (edited)

I dunno, there's silly and then there's just stuff you can't buy in universe. Such as why does a capital ship need to provide cover for starfighters. Especially after two of them near decapitated the Rebel fleet.

 

In a movie series where starfighters (well and a modified light freighter) destroyed two Death Stars, the Starkiller Base and the Executor no less. Oh and Poe took out a dreadnaught's entire defensive weaponry with a single X-Wing. All without capital ship support. The whole chase scene falls apart considering that within well established series canon the First Order would have just launched every TIE available and easily intercepted a single cruiser with a frigate and a corvette for support. Especially since the movie actually shows Ren's Silencer and its escort having heavy missiles.

 

The ragtag rebels had B-Wings capable of destroying Star Destroyers 25 years before this movie happened.

Edited by majestic
  • Like 1

No mind to think. No will to break. No voice to cry suffering.

Posted

Haha and now I remember the stupid space WW2 bombers. Did they ever heard of something called physics? I don't think so.

 

Come on, you can hand wave A LOT in movies, but all this crap is just too much.

  • Like 1

"only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."

Posted

Haha and now I remember the stupid space WW2 bombers. Did they ever heard of something called physics? I don't think so.

 

In a movie series that has ships flying by with screeching sound experiencing the doppler effect as they go by...do you have to ask?

 

That said, I'm pretty sure the director and producers have said the bombs were designed to propel themselves via a magnetic lock onto their target...

 

EDIT: NINJA'D! :ninja:

  • Like 1

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted

 

Haha and now I remember the stupid space WW2 bombers. Did they ever heard of something called physics? I don't think so.

 

In a movie series that has ships flying by with screeching sound experiencing the doppler effect as they go by...do you have to ask?

 

That said, I'm pretty sure the director and producers have said the bombs were designed to propel themselves via a magnetic lock onto their target...

 

EDIT: NINJA'D! :ninja:

 

The sound in space is emulated for the benefit of the pilot. It's as good an explanation as magnetic lock bombs. Except bombers in Star Wars in the past could launch self-propelled bombs. No need for launch bays. ;)

No mind to think. No will to break. No voice to cry suffering.

Posted

 

 

Haha and now I remember the stupid space WW2 bombers. Did they ever heard of something called physics? I don't think so.

 

In a movie series that has ships flying by with screeching sound experiencing the doppler effect as they go by...do you have to ask?

 

That said, I'm pretty sure the director and producers have said the bombs were designed to propel themselves via a magnetic lock onto their target...

 

EDIT: NINJA'D! :ninja:

 

The sound in space is emulated for the benefit of the pilot. It's as good an explanation as magnetic lock bombs. Except bombers in Star Wars in the past could launch self-propelled bombs. No need for launch bays. ;)

 

 

Why does the audience hear the sound when they're outside of the ships though; wouldn't it only make sense to hear the emulated sounds when we're viewing ship interiors? :p

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted

There's that scene in ESB that has TIE Bombers dropping ordnance on asteroids in much the same fashion. Unless the asteroids are made of strongly ferromagnetic minerals, the magnetic thing don't fly.

 

But really, why bother with fighters, bombing runs, and general heroics? Just slap a hyperdrive on a hot dog stall and point it at the "problem". Pow, we win, let's go for some death sticks.

 

I mean, sure. Star Wars is basically synonymous with "rule of cool". But it's lame af to write a deus ex machina that renders the whole plot of the previous movies moot... twice.

  • Like 2

- When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.

Posted

That would have been a great way for Ackbar to go out rather than some Admiral that's very new (I think she's in some comic book?)

  • Like 1

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Posted

Its a deadpool 2 trailer so warning on language:

 

  • Like 4

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted

Did anyone post that here?

 

 

That shot in the water reminded me that The Meg trailer came out:

 

  • Like 1

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted

Looks like same stuff as always. I'll be surprised if that new Jurassic Thing will be mediocre at best.

"only when you no-life you can exist forever, because what does not live cannot die."

Posted

I smell a Fant4stic.

 

I don't know, Tom Hardy is a pretty dang good actor. It might not be great, but he will probably keep it in the watchable territory.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...