Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I chalk it up to people just not giving a **** anymore. It's been one side having a unhealthy obsession with Trump while accusing anyone of a different opinion as racist/sexist/etc loudly and the other side has Trump and the alt right/etc..

I'm hoping that by now most people have just burnt out and don't like what's going on on either side and just don't give a **** bc if u do, u gotta Wade the ooze and filth of both sides and tbh doesn't seem worth it anymore ATM. Let's see if either side has better candidates AND if they will fall into the circus trap of last election (which I doubt bc more ratings).

Posted

We left UNESCO before, in the 1980s, as I recall.
 
In addition to the PLO thing (and referring to Israel as an "occupying force" while not condemning Syria when their civil war broke out), I think there is also the fact that one of the candidates for the new director-general of UNESCO has allegedly made anti-semetic statements and is still in contention.

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted
  On 10/12/2017 at 7:01 PM, ShadySands said:

We're magnanimous like that

giphy.gif

 

Slightly more on topic

 

Donald Trump doesn't seem to understand the stock market. Or the national debt.

 

Is it sad how entertained I am by this presidency? 4 more years!

Just wait until he runs against Zuckerberg/Kanye West.
  • Like 2

"Akiva Goldsman and Alex Kurtzman run the 21st century version of MK ULTRA." - majestic

"you're a damned filthy lying robot and you deserve to die and burn in hell." - Bartimaeus

"Without individual thinking you can't notice the plot holes." - InsaneCommander

"Just feed off the suffering of gamers." - Malcador

"You are calling my taste crap." -Hurlshort

"thankfully it seems like the creators like Hungary less this time around." - Sarex

"Don't forget the wakame, dumbass" -Keyrock

"Are you trolling or just being inadvertently nonsensical?' -Pidesco

"we have already been forced to admit you are at least human" - uuuhhii

"I refuse to buy from non-woke businesses" - HoonDing

"feral camels are now considered a pest" - Gorth

"Melkathi is known to be an overly critical grumpy person" - Melkathi

"Oddly enough Sanderson was a lot more direct despite being a Mormon" - Zoraptor

"I found it greatly disturbing to scroll through my cartoon's halfing selection of genitalias." - Wormerine

"I love cheese despite the pain and carnage." - ShadySands

Posted

The entertainment factor of Trumps presidency has basically vanished for me. Especially after the pettiness towards Puerto Rico.

Posted (edited)
  On 10/12/2017 at 7:35 PM, Gfted1 said:

Whats the benefit of having territories like PR and the Virgin Islands? Was it originally set up as a projection of national power? Seems like a one-way relationship. Do "territories" even pay US taxes?

Yes, of course they do.

 

Edit: they are perpetually costing more than they bring in. But so are states like Mississippi.

 

https://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-union

Edited by Hurlshot
Posted

"Whats the benefit of having territories like PR and the Virgin Islands? Was it originally set up as a projection of national power? Seems like a one-way relationship. Do "territories" even pay US taxes?"

 

Maybe on the Virgin Islands there are virgins to grab by the ****.

The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.

Posted (edited)
  On 10/12/2017 at 7:55 PM, Gfted1 said:

 

  On 10/12/2017 at 7:44 PM, Hurlshot said:

Yes, of course they do.

 

Edit: they are perpetually costing more than they bring in. But so are states like Mississippi.

 

 

Unless it has changed since 2013, they do not pay Federal Income Tax.

 

Heres an interesting website that talk about the US territories.

 

 

 

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/15db05co.xls

 

In 2015, they contributed $3,524,557,000 to the treasury, so there is that.  Surprised the IRS hasn't put up the 2016 numbers. 

Edited by Malcador

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Posted

My understanding, regarding taxes, is that a citizen in Puerto Rico would pay Puerto Rico's taxes on  worldwide income, then US taxes on worldwide income excluding income derived in Puerto Rico.  Then there is a tax credit in Puerto Rico for the Puerto Rico income tax based on the US tax, up to a specific limit.  Obviously if your sole source of income is within Puerto Rico, you wouldn't pay any US tax.  They also end up paying Social Security, Medicare, import, export and commodity taxes.

  • Like 1

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted
  On 10/12/2017 at 6:31 PM, Amentep said:

In addition to the PLO thing (and referring to Israel as an "occupying force" while not condemning Syria when their civil war broke out),

 

That's two unconnected issues though- not that I'm surprised given the nature of US foreign policy. Most of the people who would be ecstatic about Hebron being labeled as Palestinian would be equally ecstatic about criticism of Syria; and most of those who hated the Hebron decision would be as well yet the US failed to win the vote they tried over Syria even despite that. Which given the nature of the rebels and their attitude to history and culture was completely appropriate. Wahhabi's hate culture, science and education, it's inherent to their philosophy of man's peak being in the 7th century.

Posted

Well they are unconnected other than being listed as things that the Administration apparently has a beef with UNESCO over (so perhaps that "while" should have been another "and").

I cannot - yet I must. How do you calculate that? At what point on the graph do "must" and "cannot" meet? Yet I must - but I cannot! ~ Ro-Man

Posted
  On 10/12/2017 at 7:55 PM, Gfted1 said:

 

  On 10/12/2017 at 7:44 PM, Hurlshot said:

Yes, of course they do.

 

Edit: they are perpetually costing more than they bring in. But so are states like Mississippi.

 

 

Unless it has changed since 2013, they do not pay Federal Income Tax.

 

Heres an interesting website that talk about the US territories.

 

 

Unincorporated territories of the United States don't pay federal taxes, because congress in past wanted to have ability to impose discriminatory tax regimes with the effect of a protective tariff upon territorial regions which were not domestic states. 

 

Unincorporated territories were and are still quite lot effectively same as colonial territories were and are for European countries. They are places that are under government control, but aren't protected by constitutions and regulations of main land. In past citizens of said territories didn't even have citizenship of country that controlled them, and even now there are usually limitations and exceptions in their citizenship.  

 

All this means that benefit of said territories for main land isn't that they pay taxes, but that their citizens are seen expendable so they can used as cheap labor to get resources that main land needs, or circumvent regulations allowing tax havens, unsafe medical research and so on. Or they are seen as strategic location for either defensive or offensive purposes.

 

These days it seems that old colonial territories cause often more headache than actual benefits because development of global market and rules have have decreased benefits that countries get from having colonial territories.

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 10/12/2017 at 8:58 PM, Amentep said:

Well they are unconnected other than being listed as things that the Administration apparently has a beef with UNESCO over (so perhaps that "while" should have been another "and").

 

I don't think the issues themselves are important. Israel will ignore anything from the UN anyway, so long as they can rely on a US veto at the SC, and UNESCO reports are even less important than General Assembly resolutions. For Trump it's a chance to play to two of his bases, anti UN and pro Israel. This week certainly seems to be the week for Trump to try and get some brownie points from his supporters, assuming he doesn't certify Iran to go along with leaving UNESCO and trying an Executive Order approach to do something, anything to obamacare.

Posted
  On 10/11/2017 at 10:03 PM, TrueNeutral said:

What's "woke"?

Post-truth era lingo for "someone aware of current social justice issues".

 

Yeah, it's a thing.

- When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.

Posted

I don't know if this is the right place for this, maybe the random news thread would be better but I like to live dangerously

 
 
I guess my biggest question is who goes backpacking in Afghanistan while there's a (never ending) war there? I don't mean to imply they got what they deserved but I have questions about their motivations and judgment. 
  • Like 1

Free games updated 3/4/21

Posted
  On 10/13/2017 at 5:28 AM, ShadySands said:

 

I don't know if this is the right place for this, maybe the random news thread would be better but I like to live dangerously

 
 
I guess my biggest question is who goes backpacking in Afghanistan while there's a (never ending) war there? I don't mean to imply they got what they deserved but I have questions about their motivations and judgment. 

 

I have to agree with you on this. There are 206 sovereign nations on this planet. Around 190 of which can be relatively safely visited and most would be happy to have you. Why in the world do people want to go to Afghanistan, North Korea, Syria, etc for a vacation? There is an old saying: "If you don't want to be snake bit, don't pet snakes."

"While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before"

Thomas Sowell

Posted
  On 10/13/2017 at 12:19 PM, Guard Dog said:

 

  On 10/13/2017 at 5:28 AM, ShadySands said:

 

I don't know if this is the right place for this, maybe the random news thread would be better but I like to live dangerously

 
 
I guess my biggest question is who goes backpacking in Afghanistan while there's a (never ending) war there? I don't mean to imply they got what they deserved but I have questions about their motivations and judgment. 

 

I have to agree with you on this. There are 206 sovereign nations on this planet. Around 190 of which can be relatively safely visited and most would be happy to have you. Why in the world do people want to go to Afghanistan, North Korea, Syria, etc for a vacation? There is an old saying: "If you don't want to be snake bit, don't pet snakes."

 

 

I have friend who backpacked whole middle east. But its completely stupid to go there with expecting lady...

I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. I'm the kinda guy that likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue ribs with the side-order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol! I wanna eat bacon, and butter, and buckets of cheese, okay?! I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section! I wanna run naked through the street, with green Jell-O all over my body, reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly may feel the need to, okay, pal? I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiene"

Posted

Apparently Trump is starting to lose even Rush Limbaugh's support: http://www.realclearlife.com/politics/rush-limbaugh-says-trump-making-nervous-acting-like-dictator/

 

Personally I think there is a hell of a lot of hypocrisy going on. The ones who had no beef when Barack Obama was threatening to exclude and shut down Fox News  are screaming about Trump threatening NBC. And vice versa. People need to realize it's dangerous, even evil when both happen. Even if NBC were running stories that were outright fabrications Trump needs to STFU. If he has been wronged and that resulted in harm there are laws that deal with that. If a news network literally makes up stories they can be discredited. Does anyone take Infowars or Rolling Stone seriously? Of course not. But their protection from reprisals by the government is not contingent on them telling the truth. Aside from inciting violence or other criminal activity or committing fraud the speech protections of the "media" (broad use of the term) are pretty close to absolute.

 

We really need to get back to electing Presidents, not would-be dictators.  

"While it is true you learn with age, the down side is what you often learn is what a damn fool you were before"

Thomas Sowell

Posted
  • Like 1

I'm the enemy, 'cause I like to think, I like to read. I'm into freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. I'm the kinda guy that likes to sit in a greasy spoon and wonder, "Gee, should I have the T-bone steak or the jumbo rack of barbecue ribs with the side-order of gravy fries?" I want high cholesterol! I wanna eat bacon, and butter, and buckets of cheese, okay?! I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section! I wanna run naked through the street, with green Jell-O all over my body, reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly may feel the need to, okay, pal? I've SEEN the future. Do you know what it is? It's a 47-year-old virgin sitting around in his beige pajamas, drinking a banana-broccoli shake, singing "I'm an Oscar Meyer Wiene"

Posted
  On 10/13/2017 at 12:44 PM, Guard Dog said:

Apparently Trump is starting to lose even Rush Limbaugh's support: http://www.realclearlife.com/politics/rush-limbaugh-says-trump-making-nervous-acting-like-dictator/

 

Personally I think there is a hell of a lot of hypocrisy going on. The ones who had no beef when Barack Obama was threatening to exclude and shut down Fox News are screaming about Trump threatening NBC. And vice versa. People need to realize it's dangerous, even evil when both happen. Even if NBC were running stories that were outright fabrications Trump needs to STFU. If he has been wronged and that resulted in harm there are laws that deal with that. If a news network literally makes up stories they can be discredited. Does anyone take Infowars or Rolling Stone seriously? Of course not. But their protection from reprisals by the government is not contingent on them telling the truth. Aside from inciting violence or other criminal activity or committing fraud the speech protections of the "media" (broad use of the term) are pretty close to absolute.

 

We really need to get back to electing Presidents, not would-be dictators.

The problem is that people take what the news says as absolute "truth" and what they say and show as "proof".

 

Everyone quits that process and I will agree with you. Until then, sadly I'm on the side with Trump then, because if something is gonna be used as "proof" and "truth" then it needs to be mutha****ing true then and we need to push that.

Also simply because out news isn't an exercise of free speech anymore, that died when all the news organizations got bought by a few people and instead are just propaganda machines now.

We are outraged and up in arms about countries like Russia that control their media, why aren't we as well up in arms since our media is controlled as well? Didn't paying attention to the news and how they deceived and ****ed us during the last election?

Posted

 

  Quote

He has urged locals to stop buying kebab and to harass Muslims by walking dogs and pigs near the two mosques in the country of 10.6 million.

 

Not one of his better ideas.

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...