Jump to content
ledroc

Should encounters have aggro mechanics?

Aggro mechanics, yay or nay?  

138 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you like to see aggro mechanics implemented in the game?

    • Yes
      42
    • No
      87
    • What are aggro mechanics?
      9


Recommended Posts

Just wondering what people thought about having some type of aggro (aggression) table in the game.

 

For those that might not be familiar this is where your party generates "threat" by their actions. Most of the time this is damage to a specific character or monster. The more damage you do the more threat you generate and more likely that monster is to attack that character.

 

This is also where the term "tanking" comes from. This allows your character to artificially generate threat in order to keep the monster's attention and to soak up damage. Most likely to protect your more fragile rogues and mages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

World of EternityCraft?


JoshSawyer: Listening to feedback from the fans has helped us realize that people can be pretty polarized on what they want, even among a group of people ostensibly united by a love of the same games. For us, that means prioritizing options is important. If people don’t like a certain aspect of how skill checks are presented or how combat works, we should give them the ability to turn that off, resources permitting.

.
.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and if you are wondering what the advantage to this system is, just play BG1 and take out the ogre with a level 1 party. All you need to do is hide behind a tree and shoot arrows at him and he never leaves the first character that attacked him.

 

 

Essentially called "kiting" and usually an easy exploit to encounters where ranged characters aren't targeted

 

Makes for a fairly boring game if your #1 damage comes from arrows and those characters are never in danger of dying. Not very realistic if a monster is getting shot at 100 times and just keeps ignoring it because the thief tastes good

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I vote yes, if you are referring to a method to give the AI enemies logical and tactical responses to player actions. Pure aggro mechanics...not so much.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really. I would like to see attitudes and behaviors. Something with more variety. Maybe Barbarians hate mages and all beeline for mages. Maybe another type of enemy likes to prioritize party members in heavy armor. And maybe some base it off how much damage is being done to them. This kind of information could be revealed in a beastiary.

  • Like 8

"Show me a man who "plays fair" and I'll show you a very talented cheater."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't read the thread, just stopping by to say

NO

I would add something more but I don't feel like getting banned before seeing the backer forum badge at least once.

  • Like 2

Say no to popamole!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There shouldn't be a tank threat mechanic. Enemies should go after the most dangerous party member (this could vary depending on the circumstances), unless that party member is unreachable due to terrain or other party members blocking the enemy's path.

 

I wouldn't mind having a minor taunt similar to D&D3.5, but it should only succeed at rare times (perhaps at the beginning of the fight? It kind of works that way in RL).

Edited by Bill Gates' Son
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah, I guess my intent was more to say "should enemies be more realistic and not ignore constant ranged or spell damage while blindly following around the first dude that smacked him with a staff"

 

So more like what a previous poster stated

 

"if you are referring to a method to give the AI enemies logical and tactical responses to player actions."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. this is probably the most adamantly I've felt about any of these poll topics so far.

 

Enemies shouldn't be stupid, but there should not be arbitrary threat levels added to my fighters to keep enemies from attacking anyone else.

Edited by ogrezilla

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess for most of you that say "no" you prefer exploiting ranged mechanics and having endless kiting encounters?

I think we are picturing MMO style aggro mechanics. I want smart AI who can figure out who to attack. I don't want my fighter to keep enemies off my mage because of some threat level. He should have to get in the way or otherwise prevent the enemy from getting to the mage.

Edited by ogrezilla
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh maybe the poll should be changed to "should monsters react to damage done to them and should there be a way to escape or dump that threat other than simply doing more damage again"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh maybe the poll should be changed to "should monsters react to damage done to them and should there be a way to escape or dump that threat other than simply doing more damage again"

ya I think this needs to be more specific. I deleted my vote because I guess it depends. I want enemy AI to not suck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think maybe an example would help

 

you have the following party members

1. thief

2. mage

3. fighter

4. cleric

 

Your thief hides and backstabs an enemy, the enemy turns and attacks the thief

the mage and fighter join in and land some big attacks

the enemy continues to attack the thief

thief runs away, enemy follows

party switched to ranged weapons and spells and continue to attack the enemy

thief continues running around a table playing a game of tag with the enemy

enemy dies while completely ignoring the mage and the fighter

 

Edit: if you are wondering this is exactly how the BG games work

Edited by ledroc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My hope is that the AI is more robust than that and that if characters can pull the attention of an opponent, its not a simple "I've been lured now I must attack without regard to anything else ever again".

 

Also the word "aggro" is annoying, and I don't know why.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just bad AI. It has nothing to do with aggro. Play BG2 with the SCS mod and you'll find that every enemy makes an instant beeline for your spellcasters just like you would. Let's see...devestating incapacitating spells that can completely turn the tide of combat and very few hit points and no armor? What's not to like about such a target? Maybe dumb foes can do nearest first, but everyone else should be smart.

  • Like 1

JoshSawyer: Listening to feedback from the fans has helped us realize that people can be pretty polarized on what they want, even among a group of people ostensibly united by a love of the same games. For us, that means prioritizing options is important. If people don’t like a certain aspect of how skill checks are presented or how combat works, we should give them the ability to turn that off, resources permitting.

.
.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ya the poll could really be "do you want the AI to be smart"

but that was really a no brainer

 

Do you want monsters to ignore damage done to them is more appropriate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just bad AI. It has nothing to do with aggro. Play BG2 with the SCS mod and you'll find that every enemy makes an instant beeline for your spellcasters just like you would.

 

Yes, that is partly my point, you needed a mod to make those games better when that intelligence should have been built in

 

Its also not just heading for the casters its being able to pull that attention away from the casters. Otherwise there is really no point to beefing up armor on a melee character

You bring them along to soak up damage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just bad AI. It has nothing to do with aggro. Play BG2 with the SCS mod and you'll find that every enemy makes an instant beeline for your spellcasters just like you would.

You bring them along to soak up damage

 

Is that what they teach you in WOW school ? Fascinating.

Edited by andreisiadi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...