What was that about, Volourn?!? Please leave your insanity at the door !

 

One thing though, I don't understand why everyone and their mother decided to go for a minimalist UI. I saw it in ME2, DA2 and now the Witcher 2's been bitten by the same bug?

 

Minimalist UI is good, less things invading the screen that way, hard to pull off though. But it's not like TW had a really complicated UI, and now with the removing of the group stance and the general change in gameplay that makes less use of hotkeys (best example : the spells and the bombs), they could gain some room.

 

And Nepenthe is probably right : CD Projekt Red was definitely thinking of the consoles when they did that interface, in order to make it more portable should the opportunity arises.

Edited April 1, 201114 yr by Sannom

At least we get a real sex scene in this game, ya know, between a man and a women.

 

Bioware could learn from the Polacks.

At least we get a real sex scene in this game, ya know, between a man and a women.

 

 

At least we get a real sex scene in this game, ya know, between a man and a women.

 

Bioware could learn from the Polacks.

 

 

i can have real sex anytime i want. only in bioware games can i witness girl-elf on girl-elf action.

I can't wait until they port it over to the 360.

At least we get a real sex scene in this game, ya know, between a man and a women.

 

Bioware could learn from the Polacks.

 

 

i can have real sex anytime i want. only in bioware games can i witness girl-elf on girl-elf action.

Where?

 

Also nun on nun > elf on elf. The witcher wins.

Where?

 

Also nun on nun > elf on elf. The witcher wins.

 

He obviously knows a good brothel. That was the best reason to go neutral in the game. Well that and it made the most sense, given the alternatives, to me

Edited April 3, 201114 yr by Malcador

Vampire triplet > nun on nun.

You do realize that vampires in the witcher are downright fugly, right? Particularly the other two involved in said foursome.

You do realize that vampires in the witcher are downright fugly, right? Particularly the other two involved in said foursome.

 

They're still better looking than Edward.

Only White Rayla was fugly.

Vampire triplet > nun on nun.

Vampire on cowgirl on biker on nun.

Final cover of TW2:

 

 

I like it.

Excellent. He doesn't look like a 20 something year old, he doesn't look like a **** and he's ugly. Spot on Geralt from the books.

 

I like it too.

He looks quite old.

 

Also scars across eyes are getting old.

 

But I will buy the game nonetheless.

Not a brooding amine hero in sight, I love it.

You sure he's not brooding? Looks pretty sulky to me!

Edited April 4, 201114 yr by Nepenthe

Eh I'd have preferred something simple like the first game, but it's good. And just cover art after all.

I don't like that new face. He looks twenty years older than he was in the first game, and I don't recognize any of his traits. He's Vesemir with a shorter beard!

That's Geralt smiling. Can't you tell.

Well he only does it once. And you only see half of it, kinda fitting he does it after he gets paid.

He litteraly looks insane to me.

 

I like it.

Sure that pic isn't shopped? What's with that Gamespot tagline?

I love it. He looks exactly like he did in books.

Seriously the face is perfect!

Sure that pic isn't shopped? What's with that Gamespot tagline?

 

Oh yeah, absolutely sure. This is not the first time they show the new design actually, we could see it in a big Q&A session CDP made a few days back. They explained why they 'changed' it in the first place, how surprised they were by the fans' reaction, and how they decided to rework it as the production continued.