Don't spam the thread, Jorian. If it's not interesting to you, don't read it and definitely DON'T spam it.
Let us analyze some of the words used to describe God as per Wikipedia, which do not apply to Brahman:
Omniscient - Brahman does not have a mind, it does not think. Hence, it is not omniscient.
Omnipotent - Brahman does not act or perform any actions. It has no powers and no authority. Hence, it is not omnipotent.
Omniprescence - The universe is superimposed on Brahman
Perfect Goodness - Brahman has no emotions, hence, cannot be good, evil, or even neutral.
A Personal Being - Brahman is not even a "being", neither does it have a personality
Cause/Creator - Brahman is neither the cause, nor creator, of the universe.
Source of Moral Obligation - Brahman is not a source of moral obligation.
Now lets see how Brahman differs from God:
Akarta (non agent) - Brahman does not act, nor does it react. It does not influence, create or cause anything.
So what is the point of Brahman, then? It doesn't add anything to the universe. All you are doing is adding a non-entity.
The above quoted characteristics are all cited for godhead.