Gorth

Chess without multiplayer... I'm still wondering when the "Chess - the RTS" game will be made. People just don't want to sit and wait for their oponent to take his turn Battlechess for Amiga was one of my old favourites. I could have sworn it said EA on the box though.

They call him... El Mariachi!

Tempting... very tempting. I've been hoping (and drawing a lot of pentagrams and spilling a lot of chicken blood at full moon) for a real Carmageddon game for a very long time. Ever since I realised my old Carmageddon (and Splat Pack) wouldn't run properly post 3Dfx Glide driver enabled cards

Thread moved to gaming section (I assume your kickstarter project is game related?)

According to moby games, Queen Roslyn / Leona http://www.mobygames.com/game/ps3/dungeon-siege-iii/credits

The cosmetic industry has been using fetuses for decades without anybody making too much of a fuzz, although it gets mentioned every now and then when there are no spectacular wars to report from.

He was probably at least partially a product of his time, France falling apart at the seams during the revolution and the initial struggle of the revolutionary army trying to hold it together. All the surrounding monarchies agreed on one thing, that idea had to be stomped out before it spread. As a general, entirely subjective opinion of mine, I think he wasn't so much a brilliant strategist/tactician as he was a brilliant motivator that could exact superhuman performances from the men serving under him. Seriously, he was a disaster when it came to cavalry operations and nobody had the knack of wasting naval resources faster or more efficient than Napoleon. Artillery and infantry was what he knew how to use.

Soylent Green Babyfood. I'll sell the idea to Nestl

Amen to that!... "Sunshine State" my butt My motorcycle has gathered dust in the garage for waaay too long this "summer".

Adob

Yet Bulow had to save Wellesley's butt when he from superior positions was about to have his lines fold and run back to Brussels. The Napoleonic wars had so many pitched battles, countries constantly changing sides that it can be hard to keep track of who at any given time was at war with who. Only certainty was the eternal enmity between England and France. Besides Borodino, how many "pitched battles" did the Russians and French fight?

Your tax money at work... I guess they can't even use black humour to describe their predicament. There is such a thing as not being unnecessarily offensive and then there is PC taken to ridiculous levels where you can't say anything without it getting analysed twice over.

Hence my previous question, how do you define "greatest army"?

But the 5 military groups listed were definitely world powers. They created empires. Not that they weren't impressive achievements for their time, but only the Roman empire lasted more than 20 years. True dat. (Mongols can make a case for a bit longer, but not by much.) Touching one of my favourite subjects listed previously, the descendants of Timur. The Mughal Empire actually lasted until the 19th century, so I guess I was wrong about that one, making it one more lasting for lots of centuries

But the 5 military groups listed were definitely world powers. They created empires. Not that they weren't impressive achievements for their time, but only the Roman empire lasted more than 20 years.

I suspect they are "westerners". Personally I would attribute the rise to major power to Ivan the Terrible in late 1500's, even if in the end of his reign he got his nose bloodied by the Swedish and Lithuanian armies. Moving the goal line isn't fair... we were talking military powers, not world powers

I hope you are not teaching history It's military history goes back to the 13th century. Most of those on that list didn't last for 900 years.

I'm normally not a fan of the flashmob "phenomena" as most of them aren't funny or particular entertaining, but the few that are, are very much so. One of the more fun ones I remember seeing on youtube was these Aussie guys (I posted another video with them previously in the music thread) who after a concert at an English festival gathered hundreds of followers, tought them the verses and then marched around terrorising a small town singing Slavonic warsongs.

By what criteria would you measure "greatness" of an army anyway? Unless agreed upon, it will always be an opinion piece. Try mentioning the 3 "greatest" offensives offensives in WWII. If you measure them by popularity and number of pop culture references, you get a different list from when you order them by sheer scope, resources involved and ground covered. The latter being Barbarossa, The Great Manchuria offensive (Russians don't seem to make catchy names for their campaigns) and Zitadelle. Yet in western culture, things like the Africa campaigns and D-Day figures prominently instead.

Are there any Stuarts left? You never know, if the Scots vote for independence they may need a new monarch.

I had a similar experience a couple of years ago. I have a credit card for one of my overseas bank accounts that I never use (normally), which I used as you normally would do when you check in at a hotel reception (this one in Sydney). We just need to make an imprint of your card Sir... sure. 2 weeks later I got a phone call from my bank overseas, checking if I by any chance were in the US and Canada right now? Nope. Strange, somebody just spent $6000 on rental car, travel and vacation I filled out some kind of fraudulent use form sent by Visa and I got every cent back again. Gave them the name of the Hotel in Sydney too. Since it was the one and only time that Visa card saw action in 18 months, it was sort of easy to narrow down who had abused the information. It's still a rather bad way to start a Monday though.

I've installed it and added an MSN account. I might as well try adding my Google account to it. It's a bit trickier to convince family and friends to switch from the old and familiar to Google Talk though, although the new MSN Social network thing seems to have alienated most of them too.

Well, the forest in chapter 1 comes close. Also.. I might be a weird guy, but I really enjoyed the atmosphere in the swamps in the original Witcher, it had quite a few interesting critters. In general, I kinda miss the dark satire and thematic poignancy of the original title, although the actual writing in the second game is much better and discarded a lot of the (I'd have to guess unintentional) most unfortunate subtext in favor of better dialogue, more nuanced characters and a more intricate and political plot. I can't really put my finger on it, but "something" is missing from the first game. I'll be damned if I can identify it and just say "that's what I would have liked to see". Never mind my swamp fetish, I've always had a thing for swamps and sewers, probably dating back to when Ultima IV was released. I know, it didn't have a lot of sewers, but it had underground tunnels and waterways besides the wetlands.

Does that mean the game really doesn't have any swamps worth mentioning?