Hurlshort

Other than naming all his kids George, I think George Foreman is clean.

I took the whole family to see Avengers 2. I was worried about my 5 year old getting through it, but he absolutely loves the Avengers and I figured it was worth it. He did ask if we could go home about halfway through, but then the action started up and he was happy again. My 8-year old did great. It was fun and was more action-y than violent, which I expected after seeing the first one. I'd call it a pretty safe family movie. James Spader made the film for me. I've been watching a lot of The Blacklist, so it was hard not to picture Reddington a bit, but Ultron is one of the better villains I've seen. Big upgrade from Loki. Although now I really need to see Captain America 2 and Thor 2. I'm way behind.

Nazi's and SJW's also like to label people, and then repeat the same tired mantra's over and over again.

Why u lie volo? Honestly if anyone thinks I am a fan of Hilary or Bruce, they arent paying much attention. But Volo does love his you are with us or a nazi speeches.

They had one, but it did not get funded. It was at the tail end of the Sierra revival push.

Bruce can really kill the momentum of a conversation. Thanks Nonek and KP, it sounds like we are coming from a similar place.

Laying it on a bit thick, don't you think? Any douchebag can be responsible for this. Considering people get swatted for winning online games nowadays, I'd hardly compare this to the civil rights movement. The tactics are the same, you sabotage when you don't want then to speak. And it occurred after the Civil Rights movement(or at least at the tail end). So when Anita Sarkeesian received threats, did you leap to her defense and say she deserves to speak? I'm not being facetious, you may have and I simply don't remember, as it has been a long time. I believe both sides have the right to speak. But I also think both sides are crazy.

I condemn the bomb hoax. Kind of seems like a statement of the obvious, but there you go.

Laying it on a bit thick, don't you think? Any douchebag can be responsible for this. Considering people get swatted for winning online games nowadays, I'd hardly compare this to the civil rights movement.

The speech is from a rather long one at a domestic violence conference in 1998. The use of the word primary is sloppy, and I doubt you will catch her saying something like that in her current campaign.

And they aren't, as the Supreme Court decided in Tennessee vs. Garner back in 1985. However it gets a bit more complex than that when someone is in a wrestling match with a cop.

Typically, being banned from a forum should have no connection to your ability to play the game.

Hey, what kind of porn you watch is your business.

They deserve some ridicule, for sure. But they dropped the ad campaign when it was pointed out how ridiculous it sounds. Now you have people raging about them dropping it. People gonna rage, I guess.

It was less about the #upforwhatever and more about the changing no to something else. Given that 'no means no' has been the tagline of date rape prevention since forever, it isn't hard to see that as a bad choice of words.

That pretty much comes with the territory in teaching though. You are a public figure, albeit on a very local level. You are expected to maintain a certain image.

I was really hoping for an Islanders/Rangers series.

Nonek, that kind of reminds me of this game: I don't know why.

I tried to watch that video for a few seconds, but yeah. Budweiser's marketing team lately has been terrible though. First they had that super defensive commercial about craft beer, and now they come across as the light beer choice for date rapists.

Grow up. Seriously. Please. You are on a video game forum.

Yes, we all need to take things more seriously around here. The know-it-alls may get upset.

At first I thought Gfted1 crossed the line of good taste, but then I saw PrimeJunta's response, and realized it was a perfect post.

Volourn speaks for all of us.

Huh, I really haven't followed the development of the Shadowrun Online game.

Nothing on this? Jenner likely caused a wreck due to negligence, so is Jenner going to face any consequences? From the brief blurb I read, it is unclear who was at fault. Even if he is, vehicular manslaughter is usually reserved for gross negligence or driving under the influence.