There was a radio show on yesturday where an intelligent sounding woman tried to defend the physical resurection of Jesus Christ as being 'the only resnoble explaination to the evidence we have'. As far as I can see, when the only explaination for somthing is someone physically coming back to life after three days, there's a problem.
It's not just that she belived this actually happened, but she tried to defend this as being about more than just faith, given the 'evidence'.
These are not the kind of people who should be teaching children science.