That's the real issue here walkerdude, NOBODY is arguing that murdering someone for no reason isn't evil. What the ARE arguing is that there is always a reason and that that being a good reason or not is what's up for debate.
To some people there is NEVER a good reason, but you think that sometimes the reason is justified.
This isn't a discussion on morals, it's a discussion on the notion that, given the above, it's very hard to put the notion of murder into the catagory of either good or evil 100% of the time.
You seem to understand this, but i'm just trying to clarify what other people are talking about.
They are NOT arguing that murder is good, they're questioning your idea that it's always bad, except where it's good, because YOU'RE the one deciding when it's good or bad.
That is to say, the contridiction in your argument.
If you're saying that murder is always evil when it's done for no good reason, then nobody is disagreeing with you. What they are disagreing with is the notion that it's a universal truth of what counts as 'no good reason'.