Nick_i_am

Your realisation, and subsiquent anger, that bored testostorone filled men with guns 1000s of miles away from their girlfriends like looking at titties amuses me.

Haha, man, best troll post today.

Actually, i'm pretty sure you're just saying that science and christian faith (and probably most monotheisms) don't mesh well togeather.

No, it's a pretty universal thing, armies generally discorage consorting with local prostitutes due to health and safety risks, so you'll generally find all kinds of interesting porn in just about any barracks of a western army around the world.

I'll assume you meant spaceship and add my vote to the Skipray Blastboat, if only for the awsome name.

The only action game in existance where you play as a real-life porn star.

Loudmouthed morons who think they're 'the shizzle'.

http://www.xbox360fanboy.com/2008/03/18/ox...minent-ikaruga/

I'd care about going to hell because I didn't belive in it if I belived in it.

so gotta catch em all now refers to STDs?

Ah, yes, I had misunderstood, and I very much agree.

The issue with the given examples isn't in them being true or not, it's the attitudes surrounding them, as you've just proved. Calling the possible health effects of electromagnetic radiation a 'fraud' is an example of this since there is such conflicting data. The same goes with homeopathy. Unless, of course, I misunderstood what you meant.

Are you responding to me? If so, I don't understand what you're trying to say.

Wait, you're a real person? This is....new.

Wait, you're a chick? lol sexism. I'm being ironic, don't ban me

In theory anyway, it seems that a few areas of practical science have become a bit full of themselves recently (areas surrounding electromagnetic readiation and homeopathy spring to mind). But this is no suprise since there is big money involved.

Hence why religion has places where science can't go and vice versa. EDIT: also, 'Don't ask for proof if you don't beleive it.' is a hugely counter intuative statement and basically amounts to 'la la la, i'm not listening'. Being religious isn't a stance you have to defend right up until the point where you start preaching.

Of course, with knowledge and understanding of a divine being, the next obvious question is 'what made god'. This is where the 'science/religon' fusion people really start to fall down.

Dude, I burned you.

Yeah, god is a /b-tard. Remember all those biblical plagues? Someone linked him to Goatse.

Haha, they wish. <3 Finland You're basically looking at the same thing that happened when they invaded Afganistan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Winter_War

I'm not sure, it probably depends on your own personal definition. Dictionary definitions say things like 'a system of acquiring knowledge based on the scientific method, as well as to the organized body of knowledge gained through such research' and 'a department of systematized knowledge as an object of study'. It's a human concept, so i'd have to assume it's bound by human limitations in some way, but i'm as much in the dark as the rest of you.

Artists ask the questions that make scientists uncomfortable. We could trace back human evolution to the primordial soup, we could isolate the exact condictions that created life, we could track the formation of our planet, our solar system, our galaxy and trace the history of our entire known universe right back to the big bang and beyond. BUT, our understanding is still within the limits of our perspeption. This isn't me being some wishy washy artsy fartsy type, but the limits of science, as we define it now, are very literally the limits of human understanding, and no matter how much we could possibly understand, there's still the scope for somthing more completely outside our feild of vision. What it amounts to, I guess, is how you define 'all the answers', because you can go out and out and out, understand everything that can be possibly understood and still not be able to explain why there was anything to begin with. I'm not even saying it's a valid question, but it's still a question, and it will still nag, infnitely, at the minds of cirtain people and for as long as it does, science doesn't have all the answers.

Yeah, it's on my 'to do' list after I clear out the current backlog.

Because science only answers the how and not the why. And until human perseption and understanding are infinite, the 'why' will always be unanswerable.