DocDoomII

I want to be a pirate! Parrot companion pet! Yarrr! Me hearties!

I suggest you to send a private message or mail to some of the developer in case they miss this post. Or you could even stalk Feargus on the comments section of the Kickstarter page. He is online quite often and reply to many questions every day.

Tell me about it. I only did 4 years of english and I never got good grades. I started learning it with Final Fantasy VII. And, I have to say, Barret was a b*tch to understand.

Are you sure about that? I work for MediaMarket (company that owns both Mediaworld and Saturn) and I didn't know such a thing. Though I tend to buy from foreign online shops.

Just because there are a ****load of us that do not know the english language.

He's alway a step further.

I don't care. I don't need. Unless they somehow intertwine it with some major plotline.

That's Teh Internetz for you.

I don't remember the exact quote or where it was said (may be one of the interview linked in the kickstarter page) but regarding romance I read that "there will be various kind of mature relationships (note: i don't think he means only romances) to pursue in the game and you will be able to choose to which degree to pursue them" again, that's not the exact quote, so don't take it as it is. If someone feels like it, look for it.

I really hope the game will have a look and feel less cartoonish that Wasteland 2. I still like wateland 2 graphics, mind you, but I'd like something more.

Can I print and frame this post?

They said somewhere that they prefer not to create a companion for each class. They prefer to concentrate to a smaller number to create very interesting and in depth companions.

Jivex5k, I already said that in page 1 or maybe 2. They don't care about that. They feel that since the game, normally, allows them to save prior a battle and redo the battle countless times if you fail, than the game is flawed. Or reading between the lines "I know there's a Trial of Iron mode, but my willpower sucks and I'll end up using saves anyway. So they should just develop a game that prevent saving whenever I want."

Still. They could develop a game playable only once (via DRM or something). Is my point silly? Still it uses the same logic you are using for savegame. It's simply a little bit more extreme, but the same nonetheless.

I'm italian and I have not a clue of what "Ancenze" should mean IT: Credo che si riferisca al fatto che la pronuncia sarebbe qualcosa tipo Firenze (la mia città *_*) EN: I think he refers to the fact that the pronunciation would be like Firenze\Florence (my city *_*) AH! It will be fun to listen to the voice actors pronouncing names in an italian accent No offence, but usually is rather amusing

Silly question. The custom portrait are still the same size, or the interface being reworked for higher resolutions allow for bigger portraits?

EDIT: also hugs How do you respond to it but agree? There is also the question of "I used these companions on my first play but on my second play a completely different set", hence changing the circumstances and tactical management completely making the upcoming battle entirely different. Of course I'd know the battle would be around the corner still. Maybe I'm a lower level, maybe I'm a higher level. Maybe I took a different route, maybe I'm playing more evil and previously I played more good how does that change the battle? Maybe I am part of the Bandit's faction taking out the Nobility this time but on my previous playthrough I was defending the Nobility from the Bandit's etc. etc. there's so many unknown factors between first playthrough and second playthrough with games like these. You won't make the same choices twice (unless, you know, you want to play the same path/way twice of course). There's also difficulty taken into account, perhaps you played on Casual the first time, and now you want more of a challenge on your second playthrough. Perhaps it is the other way around, you played Hardcore the first time and the second time you want more of a breeze and you play on Casual.... see? There's so many "If's", "But's" and "Maybe's". I understand how it could be "cheating" playing the game a second time, but I fail to see the relevance.... edit: or is it the other way around? I understand the relevance but fail to see how it's cheating? xD I'm very tired... Setting aside the fact that I could chose to side with the opposite faction (if possible at all), all the things you have mentioned, usually, are slight variation of mechanics, variations that you would have to take into account anyway. Let's say that in the opposing group of enemy there's a mage. He should have a wide array of spells. That means that he could start the fight by debuffing you, or paralizing you, or maybe he could fireball you, or maybe... ecc. My point is, that having met an encounter before, by means of second walkthorough, save/reload spamming, or what else, doesn't mean that you'll know exactly how it goes. Sure, if you repeat it 20 times, you could develop a killer strategy to wind flawlessy in any circumstance, but so what? Until the videogames will have true AI for the npc, this whole discussion is rather pointless.

I'm italian and I have not a clue of what "Ancenze" should mean

I see that my comment about a second playthrough being a cheat like saves has been ignored.

IndiraLightfoot, you should try using the tag

Am I the only one that finds Chanter ominously similar to Chantry(only the class name, ofc)? Chanters in Dragon Age are follower of the Chantry that talks only using sentences from the Chant of Light. So much fun to make fun of them.

Nope, chanter is a form of bard, but doesn't seem rogue-ish. The explanation of the chanting ability seem similar to chanting a mantra.

Chanter could be the classic bard. That's rogue-ish. Maybe.

That could be achieved by killing reiteration too (in addition to research).