Pidesco

Does Clinton have more or less blood than Reagan on her hands?

I'd bet she's not any more criminal than any major political player in the US, say, the past 50 years. At best, perhaps the politicians that were ostensibly figureheads might get to pass go without stopping at the jail. Big emphasis on *might*.

It seems to me that Trump's big advantage on the primary debates was his opponents unwillingness to attack him on the crazier crap he spouted, due to fear of alienating the Republican base. I don't see how he can do well against someone who has no such problems, even if Clinton doesn't strike as a particularly good public speaker.

That must be a result of the "intervention".

10 more years of Obama, and whatever SCOTUS pick he wants? Haha, that would be amazing.

Only if you follow a christian like ethics system.

Trump seems to be going down in flames a lot sooner than I expected. The GOP seems to be ready to throw him under the bus, in order to save Republican Congress seats.

Wait, are you calling Trump a "force of nature?" By the way, the last quote on your sig explains perfectly why Trump's campaign didn't collapse six months ago.

Crossposting from the UK thread: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/brexit-hate-crime-racism-immigration-eu-referendum-result-what-it-means-eurospectic-areas-a7165056.html Why you shouldn't vote for the openly racist party.

What you get when you vote with the racists: Brexit: Surge in anti-immigrant hate crime in areas that voted to leave EU

Toyota supports practically every irregular warfare outfit in the world.

Vote libertarian: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0Psp0A-zJgU

Trump is not, in any way, the snake from the Garden of Eden.

Apparently Trump just asked Putin for help with Clinton's emails, during a press conference. We're not in Kansas anymore?

It has already been confirmed by Sanders people that that story is not true. Those same people say however that Turner was mistreated, and that she will explain tomorrow.

No one knows how to look at something critically. Either you can look at things critically because you have literally no stake in the subject matter, or you have a stake in the subject matter and then you are not critical, even if you are unaware of your bias. You have no conscious control over it, either way. Although, after saying that, I would argue that the ideal conditions under which one would be unbiased are hypothetical conditions that never happen when you are making a judgment.

“When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies? Perhaps to be too practical is madness. To surrender dreams this may be madness. Too much sanity may be madness, and maddest of all: to see life as it is, and not as it should be!” "I once got so drunk I woke up in a bathtub next to a girl I had Microeconomics with. She looked so beautiful with her smeared makeup and the smell of vodka and pineapple was pleasant. I have never felt such love for anyone since." -KP I don't like quotes because the ones I usually post are obscene. Yes, in the sense that it's even more blatant about how corrupt they are. At least try to not look like a piece of **** and all that. Well, yeah, I guess that's surprising. One would think they'd be more competent about hiding this stuff.

Is anyone actually surprised about the content of the leaks? Does anyone actually think that the Republican or the Democratic parties used to function differently at one point? The difference between Nixon and any other President isn't that he was corrupt, it's just that he was the one who was caught.

Everyone that has ever played a game with a RNG has experienced this. It's usually all in your head.

My problem with Trump isn't him in and of himself, but rather the people that support him. He rose to political prominence on a platform of fascism and racism, and a scary percentage of the American population says that that is what they want for their country. Look also at the Brexit vote, which instantly brought the racists out of the woodwork in the UK. I hope you understand that Trump doesn't make "off color" comments. He makes straight up horrible statements as part of his political platform. Calling Mexicans rapists and murderers is absolutely abhorrent and not an "off color comment"

My question is, given that Trump has repeated sexist, racist, and fascist statements to his name, and he is a cartoon example of an evil 1 percenter, who the hell doesn't hate him, and why?

And she replied that men belong on the dining room table?

You seem to forget that this is Ted Cruz that you're talking about. Few people display such dishonest character traits such as he does. Which is why I included the word "appear".

It certainly is a calculated move. After Trump crashes and burns, the GOP will double down and say that Trump just wasn't conservative enough. Cruz will take the opportunity to point to this moment and say "look how conservative and morally principled I am!" However it still was kind of the moral thing to do and I that strikes me as completely against character for a guy like Cruz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuGd-N1aBkc Trump made Ted Cruz appear to take a moral stand. Is this an accurate measure of how vile Trump is?