I would agree. Most successful teams are able to marry sabremetrics with traditional scouting. Use the data to back what the eyes are seeing and have scouts check up with what the stats say.
There was a huge war with the traditionalists throwing their nose up at people like Bill James for years, until Sandy Alderson came to power in Oakland in the 80's. He bought in early, and collected each of Bill James' annual baseball abstracts and quietly put these newfangled theories into practice. Later on, he introduced these books to Billy Beane who completely doubled down and went all in when he took over for Alderson in 97.
By this time, the sabremetric community was in glee that one of their own was OPENLY making smart baseball decisions using the objective based analysis --and all other teams are none-the-wiser.
Of course, after the release of Moneyball in 2003 - floodgates have opened and most teams employ personnel well versed in sabremetrics. Oakland gradually began to lose their competitive advantage and had to come up with new ways in finding undervalued players at rock bottom prices.