Jump to content

Arkan

Members
  • Posts

    2271
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Arkan

  1. Third expansion?
  2. I don't see any real spoilers in this thread.
  3. They do...sort of...some time... I believe that quest was a victim of the cutting room floor.
  4. Sarfy how could you
  5. NFL in HD looks amazing on our 42" LCD
  6. I think he's calling you a republican.
  7. Hmm..I could use IWD and FO: Tactics.
  8. It increases stress in the long run, though. Ever been around someone who "hasn't had a cigarette in over an hour?" If you have, you know what I'm talking about.
  9. Just checked out the cloaks. Not bad...but not necessarily better than the CEP cloaks. But if each cloak has a unique appearence, then cool.
  10. Life is not precious. Over population is real, and crapy parents make crappy people. Screw useless morals
  11. Are the cloaks any better than what the community put out?
  12. Sounds vaguely familiar.
  13. Bollocks
  14. How? Tactic in such games is based on stats, not environments. They don't play any role at all. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Maybe that's the problem?
  15. I wouldn't worry Voly. Nobody is going to listen to Canucks' conversations.
  16. It's not that simple, though.
  17. See it whenever you get the chance. It's right up your alley...in a good way.
  18. Did you see (and like) V for Vandetta?
  19. 1 did it better, then?
  20. But you could choose gender!
  21. No, no no...this just won't do. My Very Educated Mother Just Served Us Nine....... NINE WHAT !?!?!
  22. Your smiley isn't showing up.
  23. . Little kids can't tell their asses from holes in the ground. BTW, nobody in that pic looks like Peter Parker/Tobey McGuire/Spiderman/whatever.
  24. With nukes? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Your a witty guy, Arkan. Tell me if that's what you think I meant. Why so quick to offence? Was it because I didn't use a friendly heart-felt smiley? It was a joke, considering the topic at hand. That is all. My position? Do I want Iran to have nukes? Not necessarily, but do I think they should be denied nuclear technology because of what they may do with them? Not at all. Guilty before any crime is committed? How do we know that their ultimate goal isn't to obtain nuclear energy for their poplulation, just as they say? I also believe they should be discouraged. If they can be talked out of it through diplomacy (and not bribery or strong-arm tactics), then grand. All is well. The world is safe . If talks fail, then they do indeed have every right to do what they want with the resources under their soil, as we do ours. But let them know how any act of aggression on the US or it's allies (which brings in Israel, but that's a whole 'nother can o' woims) will be met. The more we, the US, the "righteous protectors of the word" try to keep other countries down or to keep them from developing as we have, the more said countries will be likely to retaliate. Would Iran use nukes if they had them? Maybe, maybe not. The future is not certain. And risking more US lives on assumptions and falsehood is NOT acceptable...under ANY circumstances.
×
×
  • Create New...