Oner

30 minutes or less trailer

Yeah, we should focus on what sucks in a game and hate all of 'em! Down with the game industry!

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/gc-10-dungeon-siege/706107

Yep, you can even blow up mines, as long as you're not seen, you get the Ghost bonus.

Mkreku gets it from Webhallen, I get it from 576 KByte.

It's not a bug.

It does.

Interesting. Ah, I remember. The help topics say as enemies become tougher, you'll need more armor to get the same % reduction as before. So enemies after a while get armor penetration or something and out of 100 armor only 60 actually works.

More like cutting wind and hitting 8 guys with one swing. Seems deadly enough to me.

Armor's damage reduction is percentile, so the value you see is probably the % mitigated.

Same for me, just replace Webhallen with 576. You'd think stocking the stuff they want to sell would be a priority or something...

This.

Wind Shear.

Attack the Block trailer Believe it Bruv. I'm sooo watching this with original dub.

It's sold for the same price and marketed in pretty much the same way any other AAA title is, I see no reason to not hold it to the same standards? And? There's plenty of buggy and more-of-the-same AAA titles out there. Still don't see the problem.

Wow, aren't you nice.Your complaint was no ambition and apparent bugs. No innovation (I'm guessing you mostly mean this under ambition) doesn't make a game bad and bugs, those were in NV too. So it's more like I'm baffled what your problem is. I'll just chalk it up to you being an AAA elitist. See, I can be rude too.

Did you play F:NV? Was it good/fun? It was great in my opinion, although it had its flaw (quest design was very mixed in my opinion, though the highs were really high, and, of course, extremely buggy). It was also largely Bethesda's code, although Obsidian tweaked the engine here and there. So if you liked the buggy, outdated (graphics I mean) NV, why wouldn't you like the solid DS3?

Did you play F:NV? Was it good/fun?

No, our (well, my) logic is "don't dis it for not being Diablo 2, when it's not, and doesn't want to be it." Does it take inspiration? Yes. Does it borrow elements? Hell yes. Is it the same? No. Do you want an exact copy? Hell no.* If I use your logic I might as well call Diablo a ****ty Baldur's Gate rip-off. FYI different =/=not as good *And if you want an updated D2, go play Torchlight.

It doesn't want to be anything, so therefore its good no matter what it is? Cool, I'll be sure to mention that when I hand in my thesis. Are you suffering from dyslexia maybe?

I'm not arguing which game is deeper (don't care either way TBH). All I'm saying is, most people play Diablo cause they have fun and have a reason to (or rather, a reason to not stop). I doubt everyone ran a checklist how Diablo should have been before they started playing and said "Everything checks out!" Exactly. DS3 is deep in it's own way. BTW, D2 has flaws of it's own. Item progression was horrible (sub-quality stuff(crude, etc)-> magic stuff-> normal quality stuff-> more powerful stuff-> regular demon and sharkskin items start appearing when you already have 1-3 unique and 20 set items). Plus item variety? Great. Often I didn't have to decide which item was better, but which item was less crap. I'm replaying Torchlight right now and it's suffering from the same. On one hand there's a helmet that gives 3-3 poison and electricity resistance, 2 armor and a bit of pet damage. On the other hand there's a helmet that gives thrice as much armor. In DS3 a few points in one stat's favour makes a more pronounced difference. In D2/TL? Another item that does -30 damage, but gives +2 fire resist. Y.A.Y. Not to say DS3 doesn't have it's share of vendor trash, but here stuff just isn't as good as what you have. If I was in a foul mood, I'd dare call D2 the trash-selling simulator. Of course I'm going by the demo, my opinion may change after the full game. You're boring, witless, hypocritical and not funny. I remember at least 1 DS1 review where the potions were called the not die button, dunno why some pretend they're so important. L2p if you don't wanna die, as a friend would say. And lastly: So DS3 is this and that lite. So? That's what it wants to be. It's not as good as Diablo2? It doesn't want to be. It's not DMC? Doesn't want to be. It's a mixure, for people who want a game like this. Gods protect us from games being different.

People play Diablo 2 because -your character is never done -it's addicting Sure, when you tell them this or that game is better, they'll start coming up with reasons, but if you just go and randomly ask someone why he plays it, "it's addictive" will be the answer you get. Also, lol at "more people play Diablo 2". No **** Sherlock. As has been said a few million times, DS3 is a co-op game. Of course it won't last as long as Diablo 2 - which is, you know, geared toward MP. Everyone who's paying attention knows that.

Seconded. Although Jehova's Witnesses are a close second. No birthdays, WTF?!?

COME ON CLOCK, TICK FASTER!

I meant control/combat/potion-yay-orb-nay related raging, sorry if it wasn't clear.