At least I have a link, rather than your vague IBM guy that you write quotes down from, but cannot find on the internet anywhere. Wouldn't you visit the same site?
In any case, he said "There's no final hardware specs on any of the systems [at the time of this interview]" right after your line.
Despite just saying that, he still had no problems stating that "Sony will have more processing power. There's no question about that" on the very next line.
The stuff about "I don't think any of us are really ready to say for sure" is about the Playstation 3 being as a total package more powerful than the 360, which will include a plethora of other things that you usually like to mention. Processing power alone, he states unabashedly Playstation 3.
Let me replay the scene for you here. The debacle wasn't that professionals like 64-bit.
You stated here:
I responded here
To which you responded here (which wasn't an answer to my question):
To which I responded here:
You:
BTW this is your reference to an IBM tech, but was not the debacle that I was referring to.
My response
Your reply. (and this was the pooch screw) was "Preservation of 14 decimal digits over 7." to which I point out how that is not the case here.
I then poked fun at you by using "numbers" in quotes to which you tried to defend yourself by saying that "the numbers word was directly relating to benchmarks ". Looking back, you said "one reason Cell isn't that popular in the "professional" fields" because " they usually require 64-bit precision at the very least". Were you trying to say that they needed benchmarks that were 64 bits precise here?
Couple that in with you thinking that Coppermine Celerons and Pentium 3s are different microprocessors (and continuing to state that the "hybrid" is more Celeron than P3, despite it having performance numbers closer to a P3).
I'm curious what your background is on AI. Particularly ones that let you state specific things such as "FPU performance in AI is a moot subject, as the bulk, and in most cases ALL of the AI is done using logic."
I'm also curious....how would you define logic in AI?