julianw

Is that a review for Draken? Kind of fits. But seriously though, you should review Draken after Mus?. Remember to mention those stories about him cuddling with his girlfriend...

Is it any different from kitchen tapwater which is perfectly safe to drink unless you live in a heavily industrialized city like LA? (Btw, don't cats and dogs drink toilet water all the time?)

But who says that toilet water isn't suitable to drink?

So basically you hate college kids.

Looks good. Can I rub his head?

Great review and thanks, m8! About the flirting bit, if you are referring to that time gabs stepped all over my broken heart, I didn't know she was a lesbian back then, so...

You guys should do each other. And we can all watch.

Only when you look skin-deep.

Sprite ftw!

Too nice? That's a lame excuse. We need more reports from Eldar.

Oh... boy... :"> (I am never covering my own tracks again.) But remember what Christ said: "forgive others their trespasses and your heavenly Father will also forgive you."

The subject of this review is: metadigital. Intelligence: off the chart. Wits: above average. Charisma: average. Will: above average. Manipulation: below average. Artful dodging: poor. Flaming: dismal. Kung-fu: overbearing. Flirting: dull. Humor: fair. Nannying: so-so. Spamming: nonexistent. Thread creation: good. Rebutting: fair. Trolling: weak. Metadigital is a member who could offer constructive and valuable feedback on almost every single topic of discussion when he feels like it and has rightfully earned the respect of many members here. The reviewer is very glad at the recent decision to elevate him to moderator status and best of luck to him for the tasks ahead.

Woot! That sounded like a threat! Btw, I thought I was fairly honest with the ratings, no? The average forum member here is very likable, so even though below average, you are still very likable.

The subject of this review is: Mothman (a.k.a. the Flying Menace). Intelligence: above average. Wits: average. Charisma: below average. Will: excellent. Manipulation: below average. Artful dodging: dreadful. Flaming: terrible. Flirting: dismal. Humor: fair. Kung-fu: fair. Nannying: ridiculous. Spamming: weak. Trolling: inapplicable. Thread creation: good. Rebutting: acceptable. Mothman is your typical boy-next-door who enjoys a bit of goofing around, a bit of serious discussion and a bit of nakid women (though the reviewer is ashamed of corrupting today's youth by providing him means to do so). Mothman is also a die-hard Christian though definitely a reasonable one since he has yet to resolve to the infamous 'you are all going to hell and I will pray for your souls' line every time a discussion has gone sour. All in all, the reviewer is very pleased to call Mothman his friend.

Probably Age of Empires.

You are way too old-fashioned to be moderating a gaming forum.

My car was stuck in a freakin' traffic jam! And it's 10 o'clock at night. If I could see him coming, I would have at least had a glimpse at his license plate.

I smell another flame war coming...

So that they could cut through a traffic jam. Some idiot once knocked off my sideview mirror doing that.

You know there is a button called 'arrange icons', right?

I am beginning to think that this guy is delibrately trying to mock the Christians everywhere by being totally unreasonable; unless he is delusional enough to believe that he is actually doing God a better service by wasting his time here talking to those who wouldn't listen to him than go and do some community service like Mr. Calax has chosen to do. (Gray Jedi Knight - In case you are wondering, Calax went down to New Orleans to help the Katrina victims.)

Feeling a little left out after missing all the flaming action from that Christian thread, I think I will attempt to start a new discussion about how Christians and atheists could learn to respect each other's beliefs as well as how the two parties could conduct a civil discussion about their differences. Like everyone else, I certainly don't appreciate it when someone arrogantly points out that I am ignorant and starts bombarding me with a haughty lecture. Any Christian who would try to spread 'the love of Jesus' (as it's their duty to do so) should be smart enough to see this plain fact. The only way for you Christians to reach an audience with beliefs opposite of yours is first to admit that you yourselves are imperfect and make mistakes and that you yourselves are also seeking knowledge and truth beyond what you have already discovered. If you deny such a simple fact that separates man from God, then you better go and read your Bible a few more times. Even then, it is only best to share your knowledge to those who show interest and are willing to learn. I guess that's all I have to say at the moment. Anyone is certainly welcome to add their thoughts on the matter here.

This bot needs to retire. Aren't WB merged with UPN already?

Never watched the show, Blank, but I heard that the producers wiretapped the people on the show and placed hidden cameras around the house, so maybe Bush is tired of cable TV himself... As for your paper, if it's in the form of a presentation, start by saying that 'People shouldn't be afraid of their government. The government should be afraid of its people.' (in a British accent) Then show the whole class the film V for Vendetta. They are going to love it. But seriously though, you would be better off with the libary if you are looking for ideas for a paper.

Though you are clearly the slave of the flying menace. Btw, Mao didn't kill millions during the Communist Revolution. (His Red Army was fighting the Japanese occupational forces first and then the very corrupt nationalists party. I don't think the causalties his army inflicted accounted to millions since he barely had one million soldiers at the start of the Chinese Civil War.) Nor did he kill millions intentionally during his 30-year-reign. His government persecuted hundreds of thousands of people who opposed their policies. Many were done by the 'Gang of Four' without his knowledge or consent. And a lot of the killings were also the work of the 'Red Guards' against the law. (Angry teenagers with blind faith in the fundamental ideas of communism, waving red banners and shouting 'Mao forever', they would break into the homes of 'conservatives' - mainly the educators or industrialists and prowestern, and beat them to death. You get the picture.) If we blame Mao for those killings, blame him for not controlling the situation during the 'Cultural Revolution' and upholding the laws of the country effectively enough. Millions, however, did die because of famine due to several untimely droughts and of course his f***ed-up economic policy. Though Americans who cry impeachment when few thousand dies need to understand that in China, life is worth little more than sh*t. The emperors don't care his people are starving to death as long as he's banging his concubines night in and night out. This has been going on for nearly five thousand years. Mao and his generation are only the first to come out of medieval China and comparing to past emperors, Mao certainly doesn't get an 'F' simply based on the fact that he was one key reason that China drove out the Japanese army and he had kept China intact through two major wars.