GhostofAnakin

IMO, the difference between Malachor V and the Star Forge came down to interaction. While both were hack fests, atleast aboard the Star Forge you had that meeting with Bastila, you had Canderous giving his moving speech about how he'll stand by Revan no matter what. That kind of stuff. On Malachor V, there was no interaction with your party members.

Considering how powerful Sidious was supposed to be, his reign did last for only a short time, didn't it.

How much better would Malachor V be without the cut content?

I wonder if they could get those companies to pay to have their name advertised, it would help cover some of the costs of development.

Not necessarily. There's almost 4000 years of history between KOTOR and the events in the movies. That's more than enough time for them to rectify the situation and set up events for the movie in a novel or series of novels (or possibly even another series of RGP).

Imagine meeting Visas at a bar with her veil on, then taking Visas home for the night and having her take off that veil. The Crying Game all over again.

Bastila.

Atleast Peragus involved a lot of mysteries to solve. While NPC interaction was almost non-existant, atleast it felt like a RPG in that you were playing a role, trying to piece info together. Malachor was really one big hack fest to get to Kreia.

I was always curious why there was an option to attempt to convince Serroco to attack the Exchange, but never being able to actually have success with it.

I don't "despise" Malachor at all. But I did find it to be the most boring of all the planets because of it's linearity. But then again most final "areas" are.

I know that. I'm just saying it seems funny the backlash Malak got, yet his "type" of villain seems to appeal to more people, atleast visually.

I would like to see someone make it someday. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Then might I suggest this forum instead?

The ironic thing about this poll and its results is that the complaint about Malak was that he was too cartoon villain-ish, as opposed to "subtle" villains like Kreia. Yet the Malak-like characters (the over-the-top characters) like Vader and Maul, have more votes than the more "subtle" villains like Palpatine and Dooku.

Uh....yeah....only when I am acting out in the Sci Fi universe.... *nervous laugh* hehe..... :ph34r:

I feel so nerd-ish when philosophy from a Sci-Fi movie dictate how I act in my life.

Exactly. No need to add even more insane bonuses just because someone happens to use a blue lightsaber rather than a green one.

I seem to subconsciously play a different style depending on my alignment. I find myself being more passive and defensive if I am LS, but more aggresive and offensive if I'm DS.

Where'd you see this?

My guy's basically just a nut who has no clue what the heck is going on around him. Can't sleep, clown will eat me Can't sleep, clown will eat me

Are you serious? Halo is supposedly the end-all of all FPS games. Too bad it isn't. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Of course I'm serious... isn't the main character called Master Chef or something? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> haha master chef. I'm sorry that just cracked me up.

I'm still going with Darth Maul. Maybe it was because the actor playing him was actually an accomplished swordsman and acrobat, but he wowed me with his onscreen actions. And his appearance was exactly what I thought of a Sith warrior to look like.

I didn't even know we had to write a background until I saw everyone else talking about theirs.

I don't recall if that was ever resolved in a later conversation. It's been a while since I completed the game, so I'm totally sure whether I ever got them to respond to that question eventually.

You mean when you ask them about what went on in that tomb when the parties split?

Yeah but I gotta write up a background for my character anyways to help me "get in to" the character fully.