LadyCrimson

That depends on many circumstances. If the light takes 15 seconds, probably so, since I'd be braking/stopping anyway. If I'm waiting for 2-3 minutes I'll assume it's stuck and go. If one doesn't have the patience to wait for even 20 seconds or something, or see a deserted road as as an excuse to auto-ignore all traffic signs, well, no, I'm not like that.

@alanschu - Yeah, I do understand that type of justification in today's age and as I've said numerous times, I'd agree the laws could use some updating/changing with the changing times. But they aren't different yet, and I'm still old fashioned enough that....oh never mind, I don't want to get into that argument again. @mkreku - so contact the related company and get a new key (or a new copy w/a new key if applicable). Don't have/lost/deleted/threw way the receipt? Wah.

Buying a product typically does not = "if you lose it, you accidentally drop it in your BBQ, or a flood washes it away, you get to replace it for free forever and ever!"

I have to say that I think my "real" level of CHA would probably be closer to 7, not 12. I can be very charming or persuasive in the short-term I suppose, but being Mrs-Charisma isn't exactly my normal nature. The latter would be more like Mrs-GruntedResponse-As-I-Stare-Into-Space. Part of that, however, is cause of the nature of all these entertainment tests ... Choice A is nothing like you at all, Choice B is closer but still not really on the mark, Choice C is closer (but in the opposite direction) but still not that close, and Choice D is also nothing like you at all (A and D can be humor-responses). So you pick one of the two middle choices even if they're not really accurate representations. Hence, skewed stats. At least, that's my theory and I'm stickin' to it. .... even long, "serious," non-entertainment personality tests have this problem at times.

Truth. It's why I never care about/actively pursue getting into betas. I'm not very good at bug reporting, and I'm also not very fast, so even if I do notice something, by the time I notice it's likely been reported 1000 times already. ... I'm still amazed by how many people will just type "My zoom button doesn't work, need to fix please" and that's it. No details, no hardware info, no logfiles, nothing. If I do have beta access, it's largely an accident. Then I'm mostly just in the "oh, cool, I get to see it early" camp, if I care to bother to download it. I'm finding the Planet Explorer's alpha's a bit more interesting however, since it's in a much earlier phase than I've dealt with before, and they're somewhat open to actual gameplay suggestions vs. only tech stuff. I still have little to say, but it's more interesting to see what others are saying and know what they're referring to.

Ah I see. And I assume this "optimizing" of the first two won't give any real idea of whether they're capable of making a Homeworld 3. I wonder if the Aliens game hadn't been such a well known stinker, if this news would have been a little less ominous to anyone? I'd still agree that I'd have personal reservations about their ability to branch out genre-wise, just curious if any think the recent flop has any effect in that regard.

Is Gearbox making a new Homeworld game, or are they going to outsource it? ...never played it, but based on the info/screens of Homeworld, I'd predict Gearbox's foray into RTS probably won't be a rousing success, if only because it doesn't seem like their forte/strength. Still...they could surprise fans, and I can't blame them for wanting to maybe branch out/grow.

Is CON supposed to be about how often you get sick? I thought it had more to do with stamina and/or how well you face/deal with pain in general. And in that regard, I'd be fairly high up I think (tho I don't get sick ala cold/flu too often either). But nowhere near an 18...so 12 seems fine to me. I do tend to forget that a 10-11 is considered a bit above average in D&D, tho. In pc gaming, I'd always try to have main stats be 12-14 or something and just considered that "normal."

The cat was smarter than the owner and retreated to the shade of a bush, once the owner had stopped petting him. Plus, the cat never took off his fur pants.

I'm feeling all "blah" and a bit grumpy so I went outside to sit in the sun with a cat, lost track of time, and ended up with mildly sunburned thighs. I used to tan easily/burn hardly ever...but such are the perils of computer tech and becoming a rather indoor-fixated human being.

True Neutral Elf Ranger (5th Level) Strength- 11 Dexterity- 13 Constitution- 12 Intelligence- 13 Wisdom- 14 Charisma- 12 ....haha, I'm a weak little thing. ... I might think of myself as leaning more towards Neutral Good too. But...that test often made me feel like I was contradicting myself from question to question in order to give as "true" answers as possible via the way they worded things. Also....too many questions.

So, any of you on IPS rated at 5-7ms, do you notice a bit of motion blur in games? Like when I'm running, I feel like in some games the terrain/some objects, especially to the sides/"peripheral" vision (eg, not everything) will blur a bit more notably on the IPS (supposedly 5ms) than on my old monitor, which was (supposedly) 2ms. Not blurry blurry, just a bit less sharp, and then if you stop, it super-fast settles into sharp again. It's not a big deal, but once I notice, it becomes a bit irritating. I don't recall ever noticing that effect before, so I'm wondering if it's the monitor ms response time or something else...like do I just notice it because the screen is physically bigger. I know monitor claims to ms response time can sometimes be a bit bogus, too...anyway to find that out?

"Hm, maybe 1080 on 27" isn't that awesome for gaming. Something seems off vs. desktop visuals." ....it wasn't until I looked at some screenshots I'd taken while I was playing that I realized I'd forgotten to reset many of my game configs to 1080 after playing in 1600x900 out in the living room. Changed that, much better. LadyCrimson <-------- the definition of "brainfart." On the bright side, the IPS makes for the best "non-native" resolution visual result I've ever had. I noticed it, obviously, but it was fairly subtle.

I didn't actually watch those movies as a kid but I did read a lot of books ... funny how parents can be so strict about TV/film but forget about books. ...alternated between the desktop, the couch, outdoor patio, and mild strength-exercising in the garage. Now unsure what to do with myself, when I feel like I can neither sit/lie or move/exercise for extended periods of time. heh

I'm like that too...lots of shows I've only tried because Netflix exists. And I tend to like shows (and movies) that my husband doesn't, so my watching stuff on the PC keeps us from arguing. Or if he's using the TV to play games, or if it's late at night and I want to use headphones...easier on the PC. ...The Voice has been the only singing show that hubby finds tolerable enough to sit through vs. leaving the room.

I suspect at least some of them will still buy the game when it's released in a final form, assuming the final form still interests them at all. Some just aren't willing to "fund" it, even if they are sorta interested. ...I haven't backed many KS projects at all, for instance, despite the fact many have been interesting/tempting. While I support KS's model for game/other funding, it just takes a lot to let loose my credit card for online purchase of anything. I didn't even have an Amazon account until Project Eternity finally got me to make one.

That used to happen to me too. I'd walk home from a friend's house at night when I was a kid and there was this one row of street lights in particular. I didn't see it as magical, however. More like Freddy Kruger creepy...to the point I'd move and walk down the middle of the road instead.

That would be cool. Sometimes I think part of our affection and anthropomorphizing of animal buddies is that seeming human desire to not be alone in the universe.

Sad but true. The quality of the Divinity series is really high but it was always more the underdog compared to the much better known D&D classics. I think the move to turn-based is turning some away, too. Not me personally, but just saying. I've seen a lot of comments to that effect in other forums, even from people who've played the previous games.

It's kinda nice having a thread for TV vs. just using the movie thread... ...saw the 1st episode of Hannibal series. Hubs didn't like the emphasis on visual effect over chr/plot, but since it's used to try to show how the Graham character mentally "sees things," it didn't bother me. My problem with the show is that the guy playing Hannibal does not in any way match my mental image of Hannibal, which I find really distracting. And I don't mean because he doesn't look like Anthony Hopkins. Because of this, I'm not sure I can watch the show. It wasn't badly done however. Except ... Laurence Fishburne added nothing to the show. I used to love him, but he wasn't that good on CSI and now this.

I know nothing about guns, but isn't it possible US guns could have a reason for it looking to be on backwards, even if it isn't? Not to mention, it's the internet. These days I hardly trust any photo. Which is an annoying side-effect of photoshop-in-every-hand, actually.

Being Liked doesn't seem to affect my ability to edit. However, even tho I don't have "mod powers" that forum, I do still have the ability to not have the "edited by" line show up, so it still may not apply to me. If anyone else notices this effect, outside of the usual time-limit on editing posts, let us know.

Made a post in the Obsidian General forum. If someone would care to "like" it?

This is a short post to test a board feature. ***This is additional text I edited in later. ... so I'd say for me at least, the Like function doesn't affect my ability to edit.