Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Fine.  Enjoy your cheese, cuz that's all it is.

And is your Edér such a painbringer that it still wouldn't be sensible for me to ignore him and go for your backline if we fought? My druid's doing ten times my tank's damage and is twenty times squishier. Weapon Focus and a few points in might/dex isn't going to make any player think "Oh jeez, I have to eat a disengagement attack to get to the druid? NO WAY, staying here."

 

 

I didn't say that he was an offensive monster.  Only that he held his own and was a contributor to the team's overall offense, not a friggin' cheesey aggro magnet. 

 

Also note, if the enemies want to try to get around him, they're more than welcome to try.  The fact is that I don't usually play in such a way that there's a single tank in front of 5 ranged combatants (whether physical or magical).  I usually have 2 tanks up front, and will use a third (or even a fourth) to create a wall to block the enemy from getting into my party's rear and attack my most valuable and squishiest spell casters.  I will not only put those additional characters in the wall, but I'll micromanage them to intercept and block enemies from trying to go around them.  "You shall not pass!"  I don't trust in aggro magnet cheese.  I do what a real warrior would do .... get my characters physically between the enemy and those I'm trying to protect.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

Dwarf (Both): One of the worst races for this build, kinda strange since the dwarf is usually the quintessential fantasy tank.

 

 

Dwarf ain't that bad

 

 

Here's an example

 

 

PotD Dwarf Defender :

 

 

Mountain Dwarf        Mig  5                1-Knock-down                                                                    7-Unbending

                                 Con 19              2-Weapon and Shield Style (Hatchet/Large shield )          8-Unstoppable

                                 Dex  3                3-Defender                                                                        9-Critical Defense

                                 Per  18               4-Wary Defender                                                              10-Mental Fortress

                                 Int    14               5-Vigorus Defense                                                           11-Unbroken

                                 Res  19               6-Body Control                                                                12-Hold the Line or Bear's Fortitude 

                                   

Posted (edited)

 

What you are saying makes no sense...

In EVERY IE game, the tank is the damage soaker. How is that cheesing?

He's suggesting that it is completely unreasonable for a sentient creature to mindlessly attack a target it cannot possibly hit.

Basically the definition of insanity.

Similar to how you can run back and forth from enemies, until only one or two of them engage you.

 

 

Exactly.  My Eder was very hard to hit, though not entirely impossible, with his DEFL at slightly over 120 near the end of the game with a good set of armor, shield, and other defense-enhancing items, but not counting any temporary spell or ability buffs.

 

Also my point was that one can make a very difficult to hit tank without completely sacrificing a respectable level of offense.  Of course, given the level of hyperbole here on this board, some peoples' definition of "respectable" may require one to generate near godly amounts of damage.  Mine does not.

Edited by Crucis
Posted

 

 

 

This build sacrifices too much. You're over-tanking. Having a meat-sack who can't do anything other than get hit isn't really helpful.

I disagree with all my heart. One of those in front and five glass cannons in the back. I "sacrifice" even more on my fighters.

 

 

And I disagree with you completely.  Creating a tank whose only purpose is to suck the enemy into attacking him uselessly to "protect" the glass cannons behind him is total cheese in my book.  All you're doing is turning the AI against itself.  Any "realistic" enemies would quickly realize that trying to attack the unhittable tank was pointless and just turn to go after the other party members.

 

Frankly, it's not that hard to create a tough to hit tank who can also deal respectable damage as well. For crying out loud, Eder fully armored up with a 1H weapon and a shield and various other buffing items can be a very difficult to hit tank while still making most enemies who dare to engage him pay for doing so.  And he's a lot more "realistic" in my book than some excessively min-maxed, next to no offense, aggro magnet tank whose only purpose is to abuse the AI.

 

 

What you are saying makes no sense...

In EVERY IE game, the tank is the damage soaker. How is that cheesing?

 

 

No, that's not the job of a true tank.  A true tank is not a character that's nothing but a damage sponge.  A true tank goes to front line, tries to be as tough to hit as possible while at the same time dealing a respectable level of damage to those attacking him.    Characters who are nothing but damage sponges are just cheese-tanks.

 

Posted

 

 

 

 

This build sacrifices too much. You're over-tanking. Having a meat-sack who can't do anything other than get hit isn't really helpful.

I disagree with all my heart. One of those in front and five glass cannons in the back. I "sacrifice" even more on my fighters.

 

 

And I disagree with you completely.  Creating a tank whose only purpose is to suck the enemy into attacking him uselessly to "protect" the glass cannons behind him is total cheese in my book.  All you're doing is turning the AI against itself.  Any "realistic" enemies would quickly realize that trying to attack the unhittable tank was pointless and just turn to go after the other party members.

 

Frankly, it's not that hard to create a tough to hit tank who can also deal respectable damage as well. For crying out loud, Eder fully armored up with a 1H weapon and a shield and various other buffing items can be a very difficult to hit tank while still making most enemies who dare to engage him pay for doing so.  And he's a lot more "realistic" in my book than some excessively min-maxed, next to no offense, aggro magnet tank whose only purpose is to abuse the AI.

 

 

What you are saying makes no sense...

In EVERY IE game, the tank is the damage soaker. How is that cheesing?

 

 

No, that's not the job of a true tank.  A true tank is not a character that's nothing but a damage sponge.  A true tank goes to front line, tries to be as tough to hit as possible while at the same time dealing a respectable level of damage to those attacking him.    Characters who are nothing but damage sponges are just cheese-tanks.

 

 

 

Well, that's a point of view.

In my book, a tank is primarily a "damage sponge" and utility character.

If you want to build yours with more DPS, that's fine, but don't try to turn your opinion into more than it is.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

If you are so concerned about PotD then why didn't reply to the idea of 1 tank and 5 glass cannons instead. 1 tank can't keep them save 99% of the time. That 1% being some kind of bottleneck with no teleporting shades or confusion spamming casters around.

It's not failsafe but 99%, lol. It's not anywhere near anywhere near anywhere near anywhere near being that problematic. Am I clear enough?

 

I send my tank in alone while I buff up, cast Returning Storm, etc. I also summon stuff - summons alone do enough of a job with the offtanking. Any monster who decides to run past my tank to my backline will be happy to stop if engaged by a summon. Too, I use my cipher to paralyze these brave souls. Then my druid and wizard just unload on the crowd swinging futilely at my tank. Sometimes even hitting him if need be.

 

As for teleporting shades. You can outrange it. Lategame shades obviously aren't a problem but early on I just back the cannons off when I see the purple icon over the shades. Hell, they can even get bored of chasing.

 

These are the damage stats of a PotD party that just reached level 12.

Fighter, dedicated tank hatchet4lyfe: 6k

Rogue: 40k

Priest, mostly buffing: 3k

Cipher, CC/utility in hard fights, Mind Blades in easy ones: 30k

Druid: 70k

Wizard: 34k

 

Like those 6k would become something meaningful on a tincan using sword and board and not sporting any damaging abilities. What's more, like they would be worth the tradeoff when his job is to just soak hits while the cannons unload.

 

Just checked my party record. Edér did 37372.6 damage. You are obviously doing something wrong.

Posted

Here is my fighter spec'd for damage. This was on hard, level 12 now, not finished yet with game. This is my first playthrough.

 

 

 

Damage Spec'd Fighter

 

Can tank well enough to stand in the fray and beat down the enemy with minimal babysitting required

 

Race = Boreal Dwarf - dwarves are cool and +15 accuracy to two of the more common enemies is not inconsequential

 

Culture = Deadfire archipelago - for the +1 to dex

 

Might = 20 - a high might helps damage, scroll use, and the fighterpassive endurance regen

 

Con = 9 - high enough

 

Dex = 18 - faster is better, more actions make for more damage

 

Per = 10 - no malus, but no bonus. wanted the concentration more than the interrupt

 

Int = 3 - fighter's don't have much for duration abilities so no big harm. Knockdown lasts for 3.3 sec instead of 5 sec

 

Res = 18 - balances the bad will save from the intellect dump, gives good dialogue, gives good concentration

 

Talents/Abilities (in order taken)

 

1.) Disciplined barrage - a +10 accuracy helps to get hits or more crits, doesn't last long. Replace with two knockdowns if you prefer. I like it as it is a one click at the start of every battle, many times I forget to use all or some of my knockdowns

 

2.) Weapon focus - +6 accuracy is nice, especially at low levels, I went with Adventurer

 

3.) Defender - modal ability adds deflection and two more engagements at the cost of 0.8 attack speed. You can turn it off when not needed.

 

4.) Wary Defender - makes defender better with +15 deflection, +10 reflex, will and fortitude saves

 

5.)Weapon specialization - adds +15% damage to all the weapons in your weapon group. Makes you flexible in that your ranged, one hand and two handed all get better.

 

6.) Weapon Style - I went with two handed for the +15% damage, dual wield would also suffice here

 

7.)Armored Grace - reduces armor speed reduction by 16%, makes plate as fast as scale. This makes your actions faster, faster means more damage output.

 

8.) Weapon Mastery - another +10% damage to your weapon group for a total of +25% that only fighters can get

 

9.) Critical Defense - reduces 20% of incoming crits to hits and 10% of hits to grazes. Since your deflection is not maxed, you will get hit and this will lessen the blow. Not sure if it works for spells as well

 

10.) Your choice - I went with Superior Deflection - +5 deflection not super but the choices were not that great. Take whatever suits you here.

 

11.) Unbroken - a self res to 50% endurance that also gives you +5 DR, +10 deflection and +10 saves - if you need it this is a great ability

 

12.) Your choice - I went with Rapid Recovery - +1 End regen modified by your might, adds to your Constant Recovery ability, again not super but the choices were not that great. Take whatever suits you here.

 

The team and their damages are:

 

PC two hander Estoc/Warbow - 92K damage with 8 KO

 

Eder Sabre & Shield/ Pistol - 35K damage with 10 KO

 

Aloth - 36K  with 13 KO

 

Durance - 19K with 11 KO

 

Grieving Mother (replaced Kana at level 9) - 15K with 5 KO

 

Sagani - around 25 K, maybe 8-10 KO her stats got reset.

 

 

With this spec a fighter is not a meat shield agro bot but a true tank like the Sherman tank in Fury. An ass kicker in full plate packing steel.

  • Like 1
Posted

And how much did the others do? Have they all been in the party for as long? How far progressed is the save? What difficulty?

This is on my 1st PotD, near the end. A few minor quests here and there + jumping down the rabbit hole is all that's left. The others are also early to get companions meaning I have no OP cipher to deal most of the damage. I won't fire up the game just to check the others, but I know my lowest damage dealer is Durance with 16k something and my highest is either Aloth or my PC.

Posted (edited)

Nice guide but very inaccurate at some points especially in later part of the guide , some real stupid sentences atleast add some explanation to them :  that XXX is Useless for a Warrior Tank dont speak in general . Edit : seems op has very narrow understanding whats good and whats bad and just calls most of things useless . Warrior Tanks are useless no utility after they engage few enemies . beat this 

Edited by Exoduss
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

This build sacrifices too much. You're over-tanking. Having a meat-sack who can't do anything other than get hit isn't really helpful.

I disagree with all my heart. One of those in front and five glass cannons in the back. I "sacrifice" even more on my fighters.

 

 

And I disagree with you completely.  Creating a tank whose only purpose is to suck the enemy into attacking him uselessly to "protect" the glass cannons behind him is total cheese in my book.  All you're doing is turning the AI against itself.  Any "realistic" enemies would quickly realize that trying to attack the unhittable tank was pointless and just turn to go after the other party members.

 

Frankly, it's not that hard to create a tough to hit tank who can also deal respectable damage as well. For crying out loud, Eder fully armored up with a 1H weapon and a shield and various other buffing items can be a very difficult to hit tank while still making most enemies who dare to engage him pay for doing so.  And he's a lot more "realistic" in my book than some excessively min-maxed, next to no offense, aggro magnet tank whose only purpose is to abuse the AI.

 

 

What you are saying makes no sense...

In EVERY IE game, the tank is the damage soaker. How is that cheesing?

 

 

No, that's not the job of a true tank.  A true tank is not a character that's nothing but a damage sponge.  A true tank goes to front line, tries to be as tough to hit as possible while at the same time dealing a respectable level of damage to those attacking him.    Characters who are nothing but damage sponges are just cheese-tanks.

 

 

 

Well, that's a point of view.

In my book, a tank is primarily a "damage sponge" and utility character.

If you want to build yours with more DPS, that's fine, but don't try to turn your opinion into more than it is.

 

 

 

Glasny, a pure damage sponge, no-offense fighter is nothing but a rules-lawyering, uber min-maxing cheese build.  (But if that's what you want to play, so be it.)

 

As for me building characters with more DPS, I don't.  I just don't think in those terms.  I'm thinking in terms of creating a fighter or an archer or whatever the character is meant to be within the context of the RPG environment.

Edited by Crucis
Posted

 

And how much did the others do? Have they all been in the party for as long? How far progressed is the save? What difficulty?

This is on my 1st PotD, near the end. A few minor quests here and there + jumping down the rabbit hole is all that's left. The others are also early to get companions meaning I have no OP cipher to deal most of the damage. I won't fire up the game just to check the others, but I know my lowest damage dealer is Durance with 16k something and my highest is either Aloth or my PC.

 

Okay, well I'm mostly looking for the relative damage values, like how much damage did Edér do compared to Hiravias if you have him. And I'm gonna tell you you're obviously doing something wrong if Hiravias isn't 10x Edér ;)

 

Anyway the party I referenced there has just started act 3, not touched the Endless Paths or gone after Aelys but done probably 90% of everything else there is to do in acts 1 and 2. On a party that finished PotD the tank with a pretty similar build did 16k (druid 200k).

 

If I cared to really play every single battle to perfection, the numbers would be even more polarized. Now it's just if it's a trash fight, I paralyze one guy with the cipher (or amp-wave at this point) and everyone autoattacks. I could bother to throw low level spells and I could bother to pop +20 defense on the tank because absolute minmax. I'm also too lazy to fire a gun at the start of a fight with the tank, which indeed would account for some damage that wouldn't cost me anything.

 

Anyhow, for serious fights, my glass cannon setup plays to obliterate. Throw three buffs with the priest, summons out to pick up stray mobs, rogue and cipher going on the important targets while the druid and wizard just cause mayhem. At this point they usually kill stuff so fast, even say the highest level bounties, that I find myself wishing enemies had three times the health just so I could unload more spells upon them. Not out to brag, just saying, the five glass cannons (or four, priest is just glass) do annihilate monsters and the tank doesn't really get much time to swing his weapon. Therefore, his sustained damage isn't important.

 

But I guess the fewer cannons you have, the more relevant the tank's damage becomes. I much enjoy this style though, so my tank is always overkill on defense. If he's going to stand in the middle of everything, my casters can't be blamed if he takes a little friendly fire. :D

Posted

Here is my fighter spec'd for damage. This was on hard, level 12 now, not finished yet with game. This is my first playthrough.

 

 

 

Damage Spec'd Fighter

 

Can tank well enough to stand in the fray and beat down the enemy with minimal babysitting required

 

Race = Boreal Dwarf - dwarves are cool and +15 accuracy to two of the more common enemies is not inconsequential

 

(snip)

 

With this spec a fighter is not a meat shield agro bot but a true tank like the Sherman tank in Fury. An ass kicker in full plate packing steel.

 

KDubya, looks like a nice balance between offense and defense that was clearly capable of kicking butt and taking names.  The dumped INT was a bit cheesy for my taste, but I've seen far worse when it comes to cheesy min-maxed stat builds.  Kudos for a nicely built Fighter!

 

Speaking those Boreal dwarves' bonuses, one of the problems I have in the game is knowing what's what when it comes to those categories.  Kiths are easy enough.  They're essentially just people.  But it gets dodgy knowing what's a beast and what's a wilder and what's a primordial, for example.  Still, I suppose that having 2 of the five (?) categories is a pretty decent benefit.

 

Posted

Sorry, can't help you with that. Hiravias is pretty much 0 x Edér because I don't use him. Did his quest, which was 1 encounter. Other than that he was escorting or going on adventures.

Posted

 

Here is my fighter spec'd for damage. This was on hard, level 12 now, not finished yet with game. This is my first playthrough.

 

 

 

Damage Spec'd Fighter

 

Can tank well enough to stand in the fray and beat down the enemy with minimal babysitting required

 

Race = Boreal Dwarf - dwarves are cool and +15 accuracy to two of the more common enemies is not inconsequential

 

(snip)

 

With this spec a fighter is not a meat shield agro bot but a true tank like the Sherman tank in Fury. An ass kicker in full plate packing steel.

 

KDubya, looks like a nice balance between offense and defense that was clearly capable of kicking butt and taking names.  The dumped INT was a bit cheesy for my taste, but I've seen far worse when it comes to cheesy min-maxed stat builds.  Kudos for a nicely built Fighter!

 

Speaking those Boreal dwarves' bonuses, one of the problems I have in the game is knowing what's what when it comes to those categories.  Kiths are easy enough.  They're essentially just people.  But it gets dodgy knowing what's a beast and what's a wilder and what's a primordial, for example.  Still, I suppose that having 2 of the five (?) categories is a pretty decent benefit.

 

 

 

 

From the wiki

 

In the traditional lands of the boreal dwarves, primordial creatures (oozes, sentient fungi and plants) and wilder (ogres, skuldrs, trolls, vithracks, and xaurips) have long preyed on isolated hunters. Generations of conflict with these creatures has given the boreal dwarves inherent Accuracy bonuses against them.

 

 

I encounter the above a lot more than poison or disease damage which is for mountain dwarves.

 

A pale elf makes for a good choice as well, cuts down on the friendly fire from your wizard.

 

Regarding the intellect dump - you can cut from resolve and place into intellect. Your will save stays the same, you lose concentration, deflection and gain some duration on abilities. If you have house rules on how low a stat can be the base concept still works just won't be as efficient. My personal house rule is to not use the godmode race. If I need to use one to make it work I'd rather drop the difficulty.

 

PotD will be the next challenge, will see if my play style works there or not.

Posted

I'd sjst like to point out that min maxing is pretty overrated unless you are on PoTD with a party that is smaller than the full 6. I would also put DEX at the top of my list of "Stats you should never ever dump" Unless you literally want a meatshield that does nothing min dex is terrible. Its like watching people fight in slow motion.

 

As far as race goes i agree with a previous poster who questioned why you talk about them so much. aside from the wild orlan, and the moon godlike i would argue that the racial abilities won't affect your ability to tank much at all, and I would also comment that 1 point in an attribute also has a negligible effect so not really that important.

 

Apart from that I also disagree with a large number of your statements. Extra HP per tick adds up, especially when most mobs hit you for very little in the first place, getting more passive HP heal means you are even less likely to ever need to use active heals.

 

Save boosting talents are often great, i mean I got bulls fortitude on my solo run exactly because some debuffs are so terrible that you really dont want to get hit by them (petrify and paralyse being the obvious ones you really dont want to get hit by).

 

Also the way you dismiss movement is a bit alarming given that the best way to tank is often to avoid damage, IE you often dont want to stand in teh middle of a fire tornado or whatever AOE spell is cast on you, so moving out the way is really the obvious thing to do with pretty much any AOE and is almost always worth taking a few disengagement attacks

 

I have a few other minor issues but your build isnt bad or anything, I just think you speak far too often in absolutes with words like worthless, best and worst. I also dont see the point in increasing Int in your build, you barely have any duration based spells, and you could have not tanked your dex value, which even if you are determined to do as little damage as possible (and this build seems to revolve around the idea that having a tank that can do any damage is a bad thing) boosts your reflex value which is the second most targeted defense right after deflection.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

In your valuing of Races I think you're somewhat overvaluing racial maximum stat bonuses compared to racial abilities. The 1 more resolve and 1 more perception a hearth orlan has compared to a Pale Elf amounts to 2 deflection 3 concentration and 3 interrupt which seems to me for a full defensive tank less valuable than 10 DR fire and cold.

 

Also Constitution doesn't seem particularly useful to a full tank compared to might on a fighter, outside of certain niche cases versus enemies who attack slowly with high accuracy at low levels. Might also increases a fighter's survivability for particularly long fights while giving a slight increase to the damage output, and possibly a decent increase to damage output if you are running a min'd int medium-high dex fighter.

Edited by SilchasRuin
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

This build sacrifices too much. You're over-tanking. Having a meat-sack who can't do anything other than get hit isn't really helpful.

I disagree with all my heart. One of those in front and five glass cannons in the back. I "sacrifice" even more on my fighters.

 

You better listen to Akimbo because he speaks truth.

 

 

 

Seems to me that Akimbo isn't playing on PotD, where the damage your fighter tank puts out is completely negligible. On everything up to hard, yeah.. no need to minmax. No need to even create your own fighter because Eder can tank just fine.

 

 

If you build a character like a tank in the OP, then your fighter will put out negligible damage on any difficulty level.

 

It's still overkill, even on PoTD to build a tank like that.

Might            10 
Constitution     10  
Dexterity        3  
Perception       15 -5
Intelligence     3  -12
Resolve          15 -5

22 points saved cost = -10 deflection -Duration on skills that don't matter so much.

Using a Wild Orlan we get -

Redistributed:

Might            18 (+1 from location included) 
Constitution     10  
Dexterity        17 
Perception       15 
Intelligence     3 
Resolve          15

If you want the deflection, but don't want to entirely gimp might:

Redistributed #2:

Might            17
Constitution     8  
Dexterity        10
Perception       20
Intelligence     3
Resolve          20 (+1 from location included)

That said, is it wrong to build an entirely tank focused character, with 5 glass cannons?

 

No, of course not. I just think that it's overkill to do so and personally prefer a stat allocation like one above.

 

p.s. It's also funny that you assume I'm not playing on PotD :)

Edited by Akimbo
Posted

 

 

Here is my fighter spec'd for damage. This was on hard, level 12 now, not finished yet with game. This is my first playthrough.

 

 

 

Damage Spec'd Fighter

 

Can tank well enough to stand in the fray and beat down the enemy with minimal babysitting required

 

Race = Boreal Dwarf - dwarves are cool and +15 accuracy to two of the more common enemies is not inconsequential

 

(snip)

 

With this spec a fighter is not a meat shield agro bot but a true tank like the Sherman tank in Fury. An ass kicker in full plate packing steel.

 

KDubya, looks like a nice balance between offense and defense that was clearly capable of kicking butt and taking names.  The dumped INT was a bit cheesy for my taste, but I've seen far worse when it comes to cheesy min-maxed stat builds.  Kudos for a nicely built Fighter!

 

Speaking those Boreal dwarves' bonuses, one of the problems I have in the game is knowing what's what when it comes to those categories.  Kiths are easy enough.  They're essentially just people.  But it gets dodgy knowing what's a beast and what's a wilder and what's a primordial, for example.  Still, I suppose that having 2 of the five (?) categories is a pretty decent benefit.

 

 

 

 

From the wiki

 

In the traditional lands of the boreal dwarves, primordial creatures (oozes, sentient fungi and plants) and wilder (ogres, skuldrs, trolls, vithracks, and xaurips) have long preyed on isolated hunters. Generations of conflict with these creatures has given the boreal dwarves inherent Accuracy bonuses against them.

 

 

I encounter the above a lot more than poison or disease damage which is for mountain dwarves.

 

A pale elf makes for a good choice as well, cuts down on the friendly fire from your wizard.

 

Regarding the intellect dump - you can cut from resolve and place into intellect. Your will save stays the same, you lose concentration, deflection and gain some duration on abilities. If you have house rules on how low a stat can be the base concept still works just won't be as efficient. My personal house rule is to not use the godmode race. If I need to use one to make it work I'd rather drop the difficulty.

 

PotD will be the next challenge, will see if my play style works there or not.

 

 

I agree.  it does appear that you'd get more value out of Boreal Dwarves over traditional mountain dwarves.  Kind of a shame.  Not that the Boreals have a decent racial bonus, but that the mountain dwarves' one seems so weak.

 

As for Pale Elves, it seems like if you're not looking to play any sort of ranged combatant with an elf, Pale Elves are the way to go.  It's hard to turn down that regular Elf racial ability and not use a ranged weapon.  But with a Pale Elf, it's a non-factor.  The racial benefit may not be spectacular, but at least you don't feel like you're giving up something useful.

 

As for stat dumps, I'm not fond of going below 8 or 9.  Particularly when it comes to INT.  The idea of a min INT character that has the intelligence of a fruit fly doesn't sit well with me.  Or a min Resolve character.  Seems to me that the first time an enemy said "BOO!" to the min resolve character, he'd be running for the hills!

 

Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

This build sacrifices too much. You're over-tanking. Having a meat-sack who can't do anything other than get hit isn't really helpful.

I disagree with all my heart. One of those in front and five glass cannons in the back. I "sacrifice" even more on my fighters.

 

You better listen to Akimbo because he speaks truth.

 

 

 

Seems to me that Akimbo isn't playing on PotD, where the damage your fighter tank puts out is completely negligible. On everything up to hard, yeah.. no need to minmax. No need to even create your own fighter because Eder can tank just fine.

 

 

If you build a character like a tank in the OP, then your fighter will put out negligible damage on any difficulty level.

 

It's still overkill, even on PoTD to build a tank like that.

Might            10 
Constitution     10  
Dexterity        3  
Perception       15 -5
Intelligence     3  -12
Resolve          15 -5

22 points saved cost = -10 deflection -Duration on skills that don't matter so much.

Using a Wild Orlan we get -

Redistributed:

Might            18 (+1 from location included) 
Constitution     10  
Dexterity        17 
Perception       15 
Intelligence     3 
Resolve          15

If you want the deflection, but don't want to entirely gimp might:

Redistributed #2:

Might            17
Constitution     8  
Dexterity        10
Perception       20
Intelligence     3
Resolve          20 (+1 from location included)

That said, is it wrong to build an entirely tank focused character, with 5 glass cannons?

 

No, of course not. I just think that it's overkill to do so and personally prefer a stat allocation like one above.

 

p.s. It's also funny that you assume I'm not playing on PotD :)

 

I assumed you had stated you werent playing PoTD or that comment is actually bordering on insulting, Its like oh HE is DEFINITELY not playing such a HARD difficulty level.

 

I half agree with you elsewise, in that i think you dont want your tank to do nothing else (ie ignore everything else) but at te same time if you can get your deflection up to 140 or so its worth it because almost nothing can even graze you anymore

Edited by Ceranai
Posted (edited)

Tbh I think a party of one super tank and five glass cannons is asking for trouble, especially on iron man mode. Since all it takes is your tank to fail to stop one foe and you could end up with shattered glass >.<

Edited by DracoSpirit86
Posted (edited)

Well there seems to be a heated debate about how a tank should be, instead of addressing the posts one by one I'll just state some things.

First and foremost this is not an RP guide, so arguments like "tanking this way is not realist" or "This is a cheesy build" are not valid.

Many here believe that a tank should be able to do more than just tanking, i don't since this is all about the dedicated tank. And while It is possible that hybrid is more effective than a dedicated tank, it requires more micromanaging to work. Still, i appreciate the feedback and I'll use the advice while writing the hybrid guide.

 

I have updated the main post, thanks to everyone who participated in the thread. I'll add KDubya build once i get to write about the hybrid fighter.

Edited by Vadász
Posted (edited)

Well, the first order of business is deciding if it is cheese.

So you pump your deflection so high the AI cannot hit you, but still continues to try...
Is that equivalent to attacking an enemy who is just standing there bugged and not attacking you back?
Is the result any different?

Edited by Incendax
Posted

Well, the first order of business is deciding if it is cheese.

 

So you pump your deflection so high the AI cannot hit you, but still continues to try...

Is that equivalent to attacking an enemy who is just standing there bugged and not attacking you back?

Is the result any different?

I have some sympathy for the minmax distaste, but not for this. Are you saying the enemy is supposed to know he can't hit you? Are the mobs reading the accuracy rolls?

 

I mean you could also argue your rogue shouldn't get too much offensive power. Not talking "at the expense of defense" even, just too much per se. Because then they could oneshot vulnerable enemies like wizards. And they would be stupid to engage you because they will lose off that instakill. This is a thread about optimization and I think three times now it's been posted that you shouldn't get so much deflection that you're unhittable because that's not fair to the AI.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...