Magnum Opus Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Rather long winded post but you voted PoR 2 which is great. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's what I do. The longwindedness, I mean... not voting for PoR2.
LadyCrimson Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 It's what I do. I love you. :ph34r: I still can't get past the longer/slower reply habit of old message board days. Today's forums are like Speed Racer in comparison. “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
Magnum Opus Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 It's what I do. I love you. :ph34r: <{POST_SNAPBACK}> It's the avatar. How can anyone not love that face? I know what you mean, though. Things just seems faster on today's Intarweeb. Twitchier, I'd almost say (I blame MTV, high bandwidth, and drive-through windows). Not that that's what influences my posting style; I just tend to blather on and on and on and on in those rare events when I've got anything to say at all.
LadyCrimson Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 (edited) @ Hades - I posted a lot on the very old threaded BG1 boards back in..uh..the late 90's I guess. I didn't like it when they changed, and changed again, and... Not that I've looked in a while. But one of those cases where once all the people I hung out with split up it just wasn't the same and never willbe/never went back. @Magnum Opus - heh, the avatar...must be. Puss n Boots was great. Edited January 5, 2006 by LadyCrimson “Things are as they are. Looking out into the universe at night, we make no comparisons between right and wrong stars, nor between well and badly arranged constellations.” – Alan Watts
Kelverin Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Pool of Radiance 2 has all these outstanding features, therefore it wins. severely bugged or incomplete game no actual opportuinity to roleplay uninteresting, generic story poor writing imbalanced gameplay unimaginative setting boring combat lack of, or uninteresting or annoying NPC's repetetive story and/or gameplay Not only that but lost my OS trying to uninstall it J1 Visa Southern California Cleaning
Deraldin Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 The NWN OC aside, the SoU and HotU are decent. It is also one the most stable games I have ever played. Withthe extra bits you git in Diamond and with one of the largest gaming communities around and the potential of MP, um yeah its worth getting. Just make sure you get the DVD version, if you have a DVD ROM drive. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agreed. The Diamond pack is worth it if not for the official modules then for all the user created content. Some of that stuff is pure gold. Especially considering that the Diamond pack is less than half the cost of what NWN alone was when it first came out. I remember hearing Vol complaining about it's $70 or $80 price tag here in Canada. "
Diamond Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 My vote goes to NWN OC (not NWN and expansions in general).
qaz156 Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Lionheart for sure. The graphics sucked. The music sucked. The gameplay sucked. The monsters sucked. Okay, you get the picture. That company who developed that game (it wasn't black isle, I think they just oversaw it), actually that ONE GUY who developed it sucks, and headed that company that made brick out games. I got Lionheart for 5 bucks and I still trashed it. "To be, or not to be a real RPG, that is the question. Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows or outrageous action... or by taking up arms against a sea of crap and by opposing: end them."
Darque Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 The first part of Lionheart was actually pretty good. It was the endless combat sequence after barcellona that made the game take a nosedive.
qaz156 Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 I agree. The first part did remind me of some of the old black isle game. But when they did the whole repetitive combat with repetitve music forever, with impossible enemies from time to time, that made the game take something even faster than a nosedive. A nosedive with full jets on. "To be, or not to be a real RPG, that is the question. Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows or outrageous action... or by taking up arms against a sea of crap and by opposing: end them."
SteveThaiBinh Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 The first part of Lionheart was actually pretty good. It was the endless combat sequence after barcellona that made the game take a nosedive. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes. The backstory was also really interesting and had great potential. Is this another case of a game rushed to meet a publisher's deadline? "An electric puddle is not what I need right now." (Nina Kalenkov)
CoM_Solaufein Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Pool of Radiance sucked s***. Perfect example on how not to make a game. Ubi Soft should have been driven out of business for that let down. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is StrengthBaldur's Gate moddingTeamBGBaldur's Gate modder/community leaderBaldur's Gate - Enhanced Edition beta testerBaldur's Gate 2 - Enhanced Edition beta tester Icewind Dale - Enhanced Edition beta tester
Ellester Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 There are more posts in this thread than actual votes. Use the poll people. I stayed away from Pool of Radiance 2 and Dungeon Lords because of the bugs, how bad everyone said they were. Even though I haven Life is like a clam. Years of filtering crap then some bastard cracks you open and scrapes you into its damned mouth, end of story. - Steven Erikson
Diamond Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 There are more posts in this thread than actual votes. Use the poll people. Ummm... Because the same people post here over and over again?
Surreptishus Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 No, he is right, there are 25 votes in the poll and 29 different people including me have posted.
Kaftan Barlast Posted January 5, 2006 Author Posted January 5, 2006 I removed Fable(because it isnt really a CRPG) and replaced it with Lionheart. ..Maybe we should make this into a kind of sticky list instead of a poll? "Attention: stay away from these games"? DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Kaftan Barlast Posted January 5, 2006 Author Posted January 5, 2006 I have a really hard time deciding. I removed the ones I didt even bother playing Dungeon Siege - Boring and shallow but it wasnt buggy. The Elder Scrolls series - Boring, shallow and extremely overrated but was it buggy? Divine Divinity - Boring and bad but no bugs Neverwinter Nights- The Original Campaign - It wasnt briliant but I had fun playing it and there were only minor bugs Gothic 1 & 2 - Uninteresting, unbalanced and difficult to control but theres worse. The Diablo Series - These games reinstated brainless Hack&Slash gaming in CRPGs as the norm and stopped the positive evolution of focusing more on roleplaying elements. They destroyed so much and we would even have garbage like DS if it wasnt for Diablo. But still, the game accomplished what the devs meant it to. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
karka Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Mmm. If we call Diablo as a CRPG, then we should do the same thing with Fable. Yes, it's not a good game, but it has much more RP elements than Diablo.
Serious Callers Only Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Since you suggested the Gothic series, that are actually damm fine games, I'm Going to suggest fallout. There!
Judge Hades Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Haven't played Gothic 1 but Gothic 2 was god damn horrid. The controls sucked, combat sucked, you couldn't make your own character, and overall was severely lame.
Serious Callers Only Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Haven't played Gothic 1 but Gothic 2 was god damn horrid. The controls sucked, combat sucked, you couldn't make your own character, and overall was severely lame. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Right. Do you think that ultima 7 sucked too? Because that is the kind of game that Gothic 2 reminds me of. Maybe you lot are repeating that ridiculous bitching about "the skill is of the character not the player" DnD nonsense.
Judge Hades Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 Lets see it is role playing the character and not role playing ourselves.
Gabrielle Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 What's with this Diablo hatred? It's the best thing to happen to CRPGs since Baldur's Gate.
Haitoku Posted January 5, 2006 Posted January 5, 2006 It's nothing but hack & slash. It shouldn't even be called a CRPG.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now