kirottu

Women, Action, & the Media published a report about Twitter harassment. By TechRaptor.

Pfft. Only CGI scenes. No in-game gameplay footage. 0/10. Would not buy.

Reverse juoksukalja. I'll get me coat.

As someone who is not all that familiar with Twitter, it looks more like they are trying to interact with an announcement account that simply doesn't allow any interaction. Is there any more evidence about this than a few tweets by the dev? I'm not familiar with Twitter either or how DiGRA wishes to be contacted, but according to KiA thread some are blocked by the DiGRA account and some aren't. So my point stands. How to get banned at NeoGAF. He even agrees that harassment happens, but it still wasn't enough. Former CGW Writer and Current Level Designer at a AAA Studio Sean Elliot:"McIntosh reads like a migraine; a fundamentalist who's switched sides; a lipless old moralist who yesterday warned you that Dungeons & Dragons is a welcome sign to Satan,"

Oldest stone tools pre-date earliest humans.

DiGRA staying classy and blocking actual developers.

Off Topic, but thou shalt not hire wrong feminist advisor for your movies. There can be only one and her name is Saint Anita.

From NZGamer's Wither 3 review. Or perhaps he meant face instead of navel. We can't have women showing their faces around. That's sexists after all.

Jason Statham before he was famous. He pops up at 35 second mark all oiled up and ready to dance.

Firstly there were 12 "gamers are dead" articles. That's a dozen not "a few". Those were the second major thing what made GamerGate. The feedback from those articles was so negative even SJWs understood it is bad idea to attack your core demographic and they have tried to downplay those articles ever since, like, "there weren't that many of them", "they weren't that bad", and "you're simply misunderstanding what they meant". The attack on gamers still continues. It isn't a daily occurence, but it is weekly. They have simply changed from directly attacking gamers to attacking games instead. Here's a good example. Frankly, after all this time and people repeatedly telling what GamerGate is about if it still doesn't make sense to you, I think it is a good sign that GamerGate is on a right track.

Second season of Knights of Sidonia has started and it's good. If it continues on this level it might become one of my favourites.

I went through all the Harry Potter books while back. I think I was bit too far from the target audience with first two books, but after those I really enjoyed the rest of the series.

That reminds me I should finish my Lets play New Vegas thread. Oh, and I'm expecting Fallout 4 to be announced. It's about time.

Community is really going out with a whimper.

Lucifer solving crimes with a hot detective who is immune to his charms. It really is quite cringe worthy.

"Press Return to Continue." Now that's old school.

Great documentary. It had one of the best placed f-words ever. Oh, other parts were good too I guess.

For a half a year now only people who bring up Zoe Quinn are the anti-GG people. No one else gives a damn about her.

I don't get it. Can you feel how they are grasping at straws? It feels good, man.

Because men are treated as individuals where woman must represent the whole womankind without any negative aspects. This actually comes up pretty often in the thread that must not be named. The biggest hurdle currently for women to be presented in equal manner with men seems to be SJW themselves.

Somebody made a nice clean site for all the journalist ethical blunders.

Tie Fighter is one of my all time favourite games, but "World of Tanks meets Counter-Strike in space" sounds kinda meh. I would totally wet my pants for story driven single player missions.

I wonder if these tumblr/twitter feminists realize that their actions give filmmakers (and similarly, game developers) an incentive to not try to include strong female characters in their stories. Think about it from the perspective of the creators: Choice A: Do not include strong female major characters. Consequence: Some minor grumbling and sighing on social media, mostly by people who were looking for an excuse to (re-)tweet about the Bechdel test anyway. But they move on quickly - there's no harassment or significant bad publicity. Choice B: Do include strong female major characters. Consequence: 65% chance (completely unpredictable) of a huge bat-sh*t crazy sh*tstorm exploding based on some minor detail of the character being allegedly "offensive" under some (usually ridiculous) interpretation. It's clear which one is the safer choice. Ah, the "Galbrush Paradox":

Future of gaming. Still better hiking simulator than Oblivion?