-
Posts
2220 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Chilloutman
-
1) not now but in lets say 20 years if cours will remain same 2) yes, they thought so (as every empire) ''Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.''
-
You can expect the same outcome for as long as there are individuals who believe enough in Islam. And unlike the Soviet Union and its Baader-Meinhof types, jihadis of their era, you will not see Islam wither away in a few decades. At least for as long as the great majority of the masses that comprise the faith are inevitably poor (therefore difficult to seduce with a middle class hedonistic lifestyle), and in a constant state of population expansion (which ensures they stay relatively poor). And if the native population of Europe continues the trend of shrinking birth rates and importation of low wage workers from Islamic countries that they cannot successfully assimilate (as has been proven repeatedly) then the problem will last until a tipping point of some sort is reached. The problem is not the odd terrorist attack or in Islam itself, its the lack of a stable European identity that goes beyond "let's keep our wealthy status quo ad inifinitum". If Europeans knew who they were, positioning vis-a-vis Islam or any other entity would be much easier. The position of the great majority of muslims versus Europeans is fundamentally one of enmity based in religion. You can think what you like of that attitude, but its clear and logical. The position of Europe versus Islam is to ignore this aspect of muslim identity, create a separate category for the most combative ones ("extremists") thereby sweeping the problem under the rug and essentially pretending that nothing is happening. The European "solution" of expecting them all to become little secular Frenchmen and Germans, singing La Marseillaise and reading Goethe was a bit... presumptuous... to begin with. I really wish you wouldn't make such negative posts....I don't believe a word of it but I'm worried you may exacerbate the tension that many of European members are feeling The Syrian refugees coming to Europe DOES NOT represent some sort of clash of civilizations. But I will say this, I may even agree with you that perhaps Muslim countries do resent the West for some or other reason but the reality is you will not see some sort of Islamic conversion of Europe because the Muslim world is simply just not stronger or admired enough to influence this Sorry to sound direct but thats why Europeans have nothing to fear...your ideology and culture cannot be conquered by someone weaker than you Tell this to Romans...
-
Sure Paris attackers are next generation of imigrants, so we can expect same outcome of another generation of refuges? Good question but no, remember France does face two real social problems that are relatively unique to the rest of Europe They have a huge problem with the integration of Muslims from there colonies They are actively involved in numerous campaigns in places like Africa against extremism I really admire the French for there effort and assistance they are giving there former African colonies...but sadly this makes them a real target for the extremists So my point being France has different social challenges to other European countries yeah sure, islamic ghettos are problem only in France, suuuureee....
-
Sure Paris attackers are next generation of imigrants, so we can expect same outcome of another generation of refuges?
-
Well, Fallout was unique by its setting - futuristic 60ties. Wasteland post-apo world is too generic
-
Ottoman only consist of Middle East and small part of Europe. Mongol only consist of large part of Asia. But western colonization is the whole world. British Empire is the whole world. Many westerners disregard that and portary Asian conquest as bad, overly exaggerated, it is because of western centricism. Europe is actually small but Europe being exaggerated as "the world". Any Asian conquest will be exaggerated as bad as it can be, but western conquest is "to civilize the world".... In that time it was most know world to these empires, you know, Britain got few hundreds of years of technological advancements against them
-
All those white peoples are from Europe, flooding earth through colonizations...today some even become their own country such as USA, Canada, Australia and South Africa. Comparing white people with other races, white peoples are more....just combine all white population of white people countries then compare with colored peoples, see who's flooding the earth...it's white people. And for god dont start with that slavery nonsense. I would even claim that whites used least slaves of all other races, just look at pyramids... White people who have white skin and blue eyes alone exceeding any races on earth, not to mention the white people genocide many other peoples in history, some colored peoples even extinct because of white people. The world is overpopulated by white.... This is pure gold So there is 1B chineese and 1B Indian people, how on earth can there be more than 3B whites? And please stop with that BS that only whites created empires. Ottomans wanted world domination, Mongols controlled one of largest empires. And I am sure there were more empires in Asia as well. And last time i checked it was asians and blacks who are 'flooding' right now. Just compare birth rates in these groups
-
Lol and when it happens that you have to like Gay Pride to be part of EU? xD
-
Well, despite that assertion being a bit comic, ISIS being contained and all (then again that's a decent weasel word). Not sure that ending torture really hurt the cause, not did limiting surveillance. Price of a free country is being open to this kind of attack and all. No, it's the price of stupidity. And Obola not only ended "torture" (which Bush already stopped for the most part, it was only used initially in a few cases), he stopped virtually all interrogation. On another subject, our borders are porous. If they weren't, deported criminals wouldn't be able to return 5,6,7 times. The reason we hadn't had a cross-border terrorist attack is the drug cartels won't allow it, they don't want the border to be closed. It's very amusing how some here try to deny that radical Islam is responsible for the attacks. No one is denying that radical moslems are responsible. People are just saying that not all of the moslems are radicals. I do not know if your media already mentioned it, but the attacks were executed in places, where many foreign nationalities live alongside French people without having any issues. I would say, this was one of the reasons behind the attack, hoping that the people living there start to hate each other... I believe that, it doesnt change fact that they were fundamental muslims. And europe open doors policy started by Merkel will cause backlash on those innocent musilms (althrough most 'refuges' in EU are still criminals by fact that they break at least one law to get into it)
-
Chechnya what? Just as i said, it's a region, not a religion. Causes of that war were socio-economical, it had nothing to do with Islam per se. Just because some use it as a shield doesn't mean anything. You do realise that Chechnya is only one small Islamic region out of many in Russia? Yeah and after you were finished with Chechnya every muslim now thinks twice before attacking Russia
-
It has less to do with specific religion and more with the region from where it all comes from. I live in Russia and we have millions of muslims, and most of them don't cause any problems whatsoever. really? *cought* Chechna *cought*
-
hmm expected Paris to be first - poor people
-
I expected humans to be done in CGI as well, seems weird how small and fragile they are compared to orcs
-
Startin to have same problem, can remember birthday of half of my family and remember every crap from half of games I played (and thats why its so hard for me to replay BG
-
Thanks because F3 onward was more FPS than RPG
-
Oh God, hope they drop that pipboy for PC. These console inventories are hell
-
You should not watch that crap then
-
Nice, so new games from Vampires and Werewolfs, color me interested
-
Spellsword, Battlemage, Arcane Warrior, Paladin and Templar
Chilloutman replied to Qistina's topic in Computer and Console
yeah mostly this depends on lore behinde it, play style can be very similiar -
Hi guys, Looking for replaying Skyrim now that I bought complete edition for cheap. I am looking into mod similiar to OOO for Oblivion - manually placed items, removed level scaling etc. Also if you can point out any 'must have' mods it would be nice as well. Just please state if they are compatible with any already mentioned ones. I dont want ton of mods but clean Skyrim is pretty boring. Any imersion improving ones are welcomed. I will dig through nexus but its so much stuff there so picking only good ones is really hard. I will welcome any suggestions (hey, even busty females are welcome xD) Thanks guys
-
nota big surprise
-
I hate k-pop and dont have a clue what this clip was about but any skimpy clothes on anime girls are + in my book
-
Well, but telling people: 'calm down, if few hundred years they will evolve their religious behaviour' will not help much now does it?
-
well, the time period is wrong. this is pre-clan invasion, so no omni-mechs. however, archers and warhammers would likely be out for aforementioned legal reasons... as well as numerous other mechs. HA! Good Fun! They are taking models from MWO, warhammer and archer is not in as well so yeah.... To me it's all about the Mechcommander and Mechwarrior series. Battletech was some kind of DOS game with no clan mechs, who cares about that. I think its about time period they picked, MWO already have some Clan mechs (Vulture aka Mad Dog)
-
check if you dont have it already installed in some mech (I am not sure as I never used these but some items are for only one mech)
