Chilloutman

What even that 'VC' stands for?

This is a very good post, its reasonable and convincing on resonates with me on some levels, I need time to consider what you say but once again a very good post But let me ask you two questions Do you want the EU to disintegrate and if so what would be the future ...as you mention do you suggest a new EU? What criteria and laws would bind it together... If you want the EU to survive what would your immediate or long term changes to the EU be that you feel the EU has to implement to sustain itself..you say things like " member states need to cooperate and support each other" but thats a little unclear as its not specific enough I would like to see EU work. I would like to see such cooperation as creating clear rules how EU as whole handles refugees and they need to be fair and balanced. We should ensure that no country left alone or or drowned by the problem. There needs to be clear and agreed rules how refugees are divided between countries, how those that don't get asylum are removed from EU. And it must be absolutely sure that registering and controlling refugees could cause problems for country as it can do now. Also EU as whole need to be in charge of refugee issues, like returning them to their home countries, providing shelters etc.. For example so that EU strikes deals with countries like Iraq and Somalia how their citizen can be returned instead of every member country making such deals in bilateral negotiations. Also I would recommend that EU creates refugee fund that pays refugee shelters, returning the rejected applicants, etc. Also EU need institution which job is to ensure that refugees are divided evenly all around EU. Also I would like to see EU institution and court that handles all the asylum applications in EU, because if their applications are accepted they are free to move everywhere in EU so it would be nice if there was uniform rules and institution which decides such things. Of course this are ideas that would mean that EU integrates more and such ideas aren't that popular these days. And things not related to refugee crisis. I would like to see EU finally to abolish mobile phone roaming charges. So that free movement is actually feasible in EU. (This just need cooperation) Also I would like see better economical support systems where member states that have problems because of asynchronous economical issues could get help and ensure that economical bend during crisis is as small as possible and economical crisis is as short as possible. So I would like to better investment and recovery fund systems that can react to problems that single member state face. Especially ECB needs methods how it can give economical support for states which economical growth/decline differs from other Euro countries. Also there needs to be better cooperation how taxes are paid over borders how assistances/pensions etc. are paid to other member states and how they are taxed and how those taxes are divided. Also EU needs clear tax haven rules to make sure that companies can't go around some member state's taxes by creating "office" in another. There are lots of this kind things that in my opinion needs to be better handled on EU level. Guys I have been thinking about making a post that you may or may not like Basically its the reasons the EU won't disintegrate but the refugees also wont go away...so if you want a valid reason why the EU won't disintegrate I can tell you but you may not like what I say because I have to be direct and I dont want you guys to think I'm being rude ? There is no need to worry about rudeness in these conversations. So feel free to express your thoughts. useless post just to prolong Bruce quote so it may be one post per page

you simply cant choose country for refugees while there is free movement within EU. How are you going to make sure that these people stay where they are? Do you also know why they want to go to Germany? Do you understand that EU is not one state with equal economical balance? You have states which have 2-3time higher pays than their neighbors. Until this is resolved you cant even think about USE. Only thing which holds it together are 'nationalists' ironically. People which have ties to their motherland. If it would not everyone would be in Germany or Sweden and rest of EU would be abandoned

well i make up my mind and started as occultist mixed with shaman - conjurer. so far its ok, i am interested how summons will handle higher diff, so far it seems i am doing most of work with my axe

so, downloading grim down, any tips? Thinking about druid character..

I never expected to see it this year. I pretty much assume that every game is going to slip by at least 3 or 4 months, usually more, from it's initially announced release window. Thats because release date is in majority of cases set by publisher, which ofc want it as soon as possible

not sure what do you mean by that Maybe that sword blades were not meant to smash heavy armor. sure, thats why they invented full plate mail. That's why I am asking what he meant by that comment

not sure what do you mean by that

Hello everyone, another video update from developers:

Quite scary guys. I get it that you like socialists but agree on 95% with Bernie? Scary as hell

who is this guy? :/

I think its supplement for a company really. When I was kid even when I played single player game there were usually some friends around and it was quite 'group play'. As we get older everyone have less and less time to do this gaming sessions so you supply it with someone else who is playing 'with you'. I often only watch lets plays of games I am currently playing or vice versa, I have bought few games that lets player is currently playing (mordheim, darkest dungeon)

well, kind of 'funny' is that part that people which call for action now are seen as 'radical'. Well wait few years and watch how real radicals will deal with it afterwards...

I did get it too when it was on 50% sale. I must say that character models are really abysmal. Otherwise its kind of fun when I do one or two missions from time to time

I must say this is first time probably I agree with Oby

Are you really that naive or I am that cynical? It might look like they want to look 'good' by these 'free giveaways' when reality is that they dont give you anything you cant have for free using google for 5 minutes. They just force you to get into their 'origin' machine

My point as well, they respond to consumer behaviour, if you don't expect anything but greed, don't expect change. Treatment of employees for one, but this is a longer discussion of course.. I'll simply concede that I was indeed exaggerating for the point. Well, its not that simple, there are a lot of companies who want to keep good PR image if you like. They could get more money but they would ruin their own reputation. With EA on other hand, there is not much more to ruin...

after last time I will wait for inevitable datadisk

Ef origin, there is even my beloved tiberian sun for free and I still refuse to install that into my PC

Then again this is also the biggest reason why I don't like the whole "Camarilla vs Sabbat" setting of Masquerade which this is where the main flaw lies. every game have some limitations, you cant expect all those aspects in game and still have same depth as they have in eg. Masquerade

Darkest Dungeon, missing last boss on lvl 3 and then all my party is on or above level 4, lost occultist on one of my last run so I was pretty sad :/

believe in what you want and call it as you want, again, it doesnt change fact that you are using your moral compas where something is good and something is evil and i am done talking to you until you stop quoting wall of text or your post will be only thing on each page

sure they are, cant even believe that we have to explain something that basic to Bruce No they part of your definition of morality, I don't kill people because I'm " good " ...I don't kill people because I think its inherently wrong and against basic human rights even you yourself can see that you are not doing it because its evil. Morality and good or evil may be subjective, but it doesn't change that fact No once again I disagree with your premise,I don't think of my actions as " good " or " evil " Thats fine if you see things like that but its not a fact for me because both these words can be seen in a different way which fundamentally changes there definition. Do you think ISIS thinks they evil? no they dont, thats why i typed its subjective, do i have to get you definition of subjective? Okay let me try this from a different way, what is a fact in your post ?You said " it doesn't change the fact " fact is that for you killing people is evil, or are you saying that you are not doing it because its to much hassle so you just wait till they die? xD oh my, or even worse, are you not doing it only because its against the law?????

sure they are, cant even believe that we have to explain something that basic to Bruce No they part of your definition of morality, I don't kill people because I'm " good " ...I don't kill people because I think its inherently wrong and against basic human rights even you yourself can see that you are not doing it because its evil. Morality and good or evil may be subjective, but it doesn't change that fact No once again I disagree with your premise,I don't think of my actions as " good " or " evil " Thats fine if you see things like that but its not a fact for me because both these words can be seen in a different way which fundamentally changes there definition. Do you think ISIS thinks they evil? no they dont, thats why i typed its subjective, do i have to get you definition of subjective?

sure they are, cant even believe that we have to explain something that basic to Bruce No they part of your definition of morality, I don't kill people because I'm " good " ...I don't kill people because I think its inherently wrong and against basic human rights even you yourself can see that you are not doing it because its evil. Morality and good or evil may be subjective, but it doesn't change that fact Morality (from the Latin moralitas "manner, character, proper behavior") is the differentiation of intentions, decisions, and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper: In other words, it is the disjunction between right and wrong. Good: 1. morally excellent; virtuous; righteous; pious: a good man. 2.satisfactory in quality, quantity, or degree: a good teacher; good health. 3. of high quality; excellent. 4. right; proper; fit: It is good that you are here. His credentials are good. 5. well-behaved: a good child. 6. kind, beneficent, or friendly: to do a good deed. 7. honorable or worthy; in good standing: a good name. Evil: 1. morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked: evil deeds; an evil life. 2.harmful; injurious: evil laws. 3. characterized or accompanied by misfortune or suffering; unfortunate; disastrous: to be fallen on evil days. 4. due to actual or imputed bad conduct or character: an evil reputation. 5. marked by anger, irritability, irascibility, etc.: He is known for his evil disposition. didnt i just typed that?