ShadowPaladin V1.0

He/She has to die, you cant come back from a journey like than and just settle down and live happy ever after.

You get funny dialogue if you ask.

The concept of privacy is lost on some people. They are called private messages for a reason.

Revan was done for you in a way the only thing that interested me about it was how that revelation effected the character I had been playing upto that point of the game. The exile is as empty or as full as you make them while they have some background for the most part its unobtrusive and you have a 10 year gap to fill in the blanks.

Such as ?

I like to think of them as Bethesda's problem now.

In KOTOR I believe that sabers had finesse built in and would default the highest. In KOTOR II finesse is a feat for both melee and lightsaber. Dex adds to your AC and makes you harder to hit. As long as you buy weapon finesse it will also add to your to hit as well.

You realise this will get moved to general gaming ? Tough call, between us we have one of each (sometimes two or three). I'd place the Xbox last just on quantity of games I like. PS2 probably just ahead of the GC, but the GC has had some really great ones recently and paired up with GBA adapter it might just edge out the PS2. I've bought maybe 2 PC games over the last year. Dawn of War and the NwN pack for

And that why CRPGs will never be as much fun as PnP

No, that one just made me laugh. Short of giving him telekinetic combat that wasnt so bad. I meant the awful "love" scenes.

Alcoholic frieghter pilot.

If it was , then there isnt really any sort of gain to be made from it. If it was done without consent someone would find themselves on the unemployment line methinks. That was exactly my reaction to the force ghost at the end of ROJ.

EP II made me cringe ... I'm not really looking forward to III , I'm going to watch it of course since I watched all the others, but I dont have any expectations of it either. Not that I had many after EPI and that awful EP II scene.

Maybe not for the same reasons exactly but the conclusion matches mine pretty much word for word. By far the biggest mistake Obsidian made in my opinion was not cleaning up those extra files. Without those, all of this would have been nothing but speculations and died off. KOTOR had a bunch of stuff cut too, but it wasnt left behind for people to find so easily.

Quite likely yes. Or at least have the sense to take a look at the new game before dismissing it. It's not like Xbox or PC owners can really be choosey when it comes to RPGS.

You have such a unique way of agreeing with me.

Otherwise you get the ever so useful force enlightenment..

http://www.eurogamer.net/article.php?article_id=57928 http://www.eurogamer.net/view_screenshot.p...E4_chsaw__1.jpg

That depends entirely on how you look at it. If you see Obsidian as a million seller company , then what happens here isnt worth diddly. Even if everyone signed up here didnt by KOTOR III, it would make little impact. Fanbase is only important if you rely on them for you sales, which KOTOR II didnt since it was a mass market title.Fanbases of the forgiving kind are also useful for shifting blame to others. Troika fans following TOEE springs to mind. Equally fanbases can be a dam nuisence when your trying to do something new to an established franchise. Publishers and liscenses are worth a heck of a lot more than fans in the real world. Those are the people you want to placate, not some screaming message board yahoo's.

As long as KOTOR III isnt december 2005 :D There is usually a spike in sales of the original game when a sequel is released people seeing what they missed first time around probably.

I think it happens if he's "killed" prior to that scene. It's not something I've come across but I read about it on here a couple of times.

If you want to back that up why dont you find a PC game that hasnt required patching

Sure thats a gain for you. Where is that a gain for Obsidian ? Who is the one being selfish here ? Really ? Well excuse me if I think your wrong. Go read any PC games bug board from HLII to Bloodlines. Even in the dim and distant past of FOII it was still more buggy than TSL. The fact that you think because you paid 800 for you PC warrants you preferential treatment is what makes YOU the selfish one. It is equality, both games shipped with the same story content. They are equal. If you change the story content they are no longer equal. Short of drawing a diagram you cant make it any more clear than that. It's both not stupid or untrue. It simply shows the selfishness of your position. If you dont like that, well too bad because your position is one motivated purely by selfishness. Mine on the other hand wouldnt change regardless of which version of the game I owned.

I thought it was moot to point out cross platform. Guess not.. The only relevent question is does it need patching to be playable. If it dosnt then its not a requirement. Of course it's obvious to me. But that dosnt mean I think they should do one rather than get on with something new. And no one has really shown any real benifits in doing one either, except that they want one. Since you brought up TOL. Ok they did TOL , TOL was amazing. But IWDII still bombed so unless it was a case of having people "spare" with no projects to work on, then doing such things are of questionable value in the big picture.