pmp10

Depends if you can stomach first person melee combat. If you can it's ok in coop but certainly not as interesting as a FPS like Borderlands. I think I'm done with Witcher 2 and the game left me completely conflicted. On one hand the production values and attention to detail are certainly great but the whole feels not as good as the individual parts. Combat system looks like it should belong in a much larger sandbox game, character advancement is almost optional, storyline keeps dragging the irrelevant Wild hunt subplot and introduce/reference events/characters from outside the scope of the games. Add to that the fact that writers still haven't learned their target audience and keep translating things that absolutely make no-sense in English which makes the story-driven nature of the game somewhat of a mess. On the other hand the choice player makes in chapter 2 turns out to be quite significant to the storyline development. Unfortunately since all decisions from the previous games were thrown away I have no faith that they will matter at all in the next installment.

Take a look at civfanatics tutorials. Cuban Isolationists succession game in particular provided a good intro to the vanilla civ4.

At the current subscriber level you'll need to wait more then a couple of months. In fact, chances are it will not go F2P until at least one expansion ships.

Depends on your playstyle: Civ5 for warmongering, Civ4 for builders game. Neither will be particularly gentle to a newcomer but they are still far easier than previous installments.

Laran has a long history of publishing their own IPs and a build-up fanbase. Obsidian on the other hand lived of sequels and published only one original IP. Besides there are matters of running costs to consider. What can work for Laran/PB/CDP in Europe may not be viable for Obsidian in California.

I rather have a game based on Slavic myth from them, I am so much sick of all the beating of the dead horse in the generic western RPGs elves dwarves and gnomes... The fantasy RPG genre need some variations... Slavic mythology would be too alien for a average player. They can get away with putting some parts of it like in the Witcher but an entire game based on it would never sell well.

That's what the publishers would like to think. The reality is that many parts of the EULAs are simply illegal and go through only because nobody will challenge them in court.

So how is the combat? The demo made it look fun but somewhat of a mess meant more for an mmo. I really don't want to fall-back on the tank-nuker-healbot holy trinity in a single player game. On topic:I'm slowly making my way through Witcher 2. It's certainly has great production values but it has quite a few issues that seriously irritate me. In particular - the combat system that looks like a ballet and the overdone political-cynicism. So far they really drag the game down from 'very-good' to the 'above-average'.

We already know that you no longer build additional bases so that's not entirely true.

Interesting interview with the creator of Journey. Anyone else feel he has more point than he should?

There's no story. Few hours worth of cut-scenes indicate otherwise. Whether it's any good is another matter.

As long as the Microsoft company line is that blu-ray is obsolete and will be replaced in the near future fully by digital downloads, I don't see it happening. I assume their R&D staff are from the Nordic countries, or some other equally civilised place with no bandwidth limits. That attitude may change soon. They will need some kind of drive for their new xbox.

Just about finished Skyrim. While I see that it fixed some problems present in Oblivion I still liked it's predecessor more. Especially the guild quest-lines ended up really disappointing. Overall the game is certainly not bad but after a wait that long Bethesda could have done better.

Don't believe anything regarding piracy found on youtube. Videos such as this will likely be scams trying to get you to register somewhere or fill a survey. If pirating such a title like D3 will become possible the fix will hit torrent sites first.

That's actually a pretty good number. Warhammer online had first month retainment of around 50% and it was considered a failure. DAOC was considered a success with over 60% and we're talking first month only. If they can maintain a population of ~1 million they are bound to turn good profit.

I certainly hope that won't happen. We butcher enough history as is - alternative history is usually just an attempt to impose specific interpretations on times and events that just can't be bend enough to peoples liking.

Finishing up Tribes Ascend. I really want to like the game but the sheer amount of technical issues I keep troubleshooting makes me feel like I should be getting payed for this. Since population keeps falling I imagine I'll just finish class unlocks before the game dies. With the disappointment of Risen 2 moved up to Skyrim. So far it's predictable ES game although I just don't get the point of perk system. From what I see it's even more broken that the stats that got removed with some perks changing the whole dynamic of combat.

Sure it will - the greater good of people in that former-Soviet bloc country. This however should not concern Microsoft and frankly if we were to be satisfied with such low likelihoods we can as well abolish private property altogether. After all - you never know if the things you own can possibly result in greater good when put in other people hands.

The problem with this argument is that you want to judge whether any value was lost. Or to put it another way: If someone doesn't use their car is it okay to steal it? Surly it was going to rust no value loss will occur. Actually there are laws that allow that sort of thing. Here in the US. Adverse possession in the case of citizens taking something that isn't theirs and eminent domain for the government. Except this regards land and is instituted by law. I don't see why the same should apply to intellectual property. We make exceptions to our laws in extraordinary situations but greater good will not be served by allowing people to torrent the latest video game.

The problem with this argument is that you want to judge whether any value was lost. Or to put it another way: If someone doesn't use their car is it okay to steal it? Surly it was going to rust no value loss will occur.

My historical interests are mostly focus on impact and misrepresentation in modern culture. No practical favorite period but I tend to follow trends of appearances in pop-culture. Definitely this. Realpolitik made almost 2500 year ago show you how little our nature has really changed.

The whole 'internet is being oppressed' angle is slowly moving towards absurdity. Internet has simply outgrown the whole wild-west stage and it will get regulated. If pirates were capable of some forward thinking they would push for light regulation themselves. This way they may delay things but when they'll finally happen they will hit hard.

True but it had dodging. I hoped PB had learned the lesson of what happens when Gothic 3 did away with it.

You can only block. No dodging. Oh dear. And I suppose you still cannot block animals forcing a constant attack spam? Thanks for the answer btw.

Is combat still dodge-driven or has it gone back to gothic3-style spam? Can't find anything on it as ppl are really confused on how it worked in risen/gothic2. I really don't get how they could play those games and not use side-dodging and back-jumping.