Orogun01

"403 forbidden" sounds kinky.

Don't worry, BW has joined bethesda in the old adage "Mods will fix it."

Yes but where's the study that says that they don't cause sexism?

That is quite despicable with what Bruce wrote. The least Bruce could do is apologise. You know Bruce, you can admit you are wrong. I think the best solution is for Bruce to admit he is wrong and apologise to Volourn. And donate to his Patreon.

@Cultist: I never understood how people could waste time playing a game out of spite, it seems from your post that you played the game just to be critical of it. DA:I is nowhere near perfect and has some glaring issues but the fact that you dislike everything; even what they did well, is telling of your bias.

That's just Captain America, The Hulk is on radiation.

It may be that because corporations stock would drop if they become involved in a scandal they decided to take a preventive measure and try to disrupt conversation. Kind of incredible and sad that 5 months into this thing they are still finding new cases of corruption, not bad for a thing that everyone thought was going to be over in a few weeks. Its kind of like the Civil War of gaming.

As for the points concerning feminism, it is tangentially related as the SJWs are self described feminists of the sort that commit atrocious actions under its banner. GG is a coming together of people some of which may not be gamers but have a bone to pick with the opposition. Republicans and right wings are sympathetic since they have seemingly been dealing with these extremists for a while with the media ignoring them or ridiculing them. The left is united more in their fight against the right than in its desire to police itself it seems.

I didn't mind it so much but I'm still bother by the poor writing and the fact that nobody thought that having the first 15 minutes or so, be a narration info dump for a system that's pretty self explanatory was a good idea. A waste of screen time in order to quell what I think was the filmmakers' fears that people would be confused.

Yeah, he got owned by Chris Kluwe pretty hard. Then again, this is a dude who believes that male seed cures women's depression, so it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that he's proven himself to be the intellectual lesser of an ex-NFL player. Edit: seriously though, why the hell can't I use medical terms without being censored? That actually isn't as far-fetched as it sounds, estrogen has been linked to depression in women and the testosterone within the male seed could help balance their hormone levels. http://www.webmd.com/women/guide/estrogen-and-womens-emotions

I might be having a hangover, but are you suggesting that we should add an amendment in the constitution for the right to drive a car? Driving Cars is not a right, also the sell of cars needs to be regulated. They are selling sports cars that go from 0 to 60 in fractions of a second, but when Paul Walker died in one you don't see the media on a frenzy asking that they ban cars or that they regulate them. At best you get a comment saying that they shouldn't sell cars like these, and you definitively don't get a Congressional Hearing trying to ban them.

Happy New year and good luck with your hangovers.

Try respecializing, follow some power build.

Well, this thread needs more Russian "domes" if you catch my drift.

Is that the Kremlin on the background?

Well, considering that in the US you don't enjoy a "special relationship" with the cops (translation: they aren't obligated to do **** for you) I'd say that it is a must have. Plus the response time of cops isn't immediate.

That woman has way too much clavicle.

I'm starting a political party called **** the Children, or stance is **** the children they ruin everything. Whenever some comes up with some think of the children type of news scare we just go **** 'em

"I don't support censorship unless its really warranted, like a group of people on a forum just verbally abusing someone because they are a minority I want to ask you something before I respond, do you feel that there is a covert and orchestrated campaign from some circles to attack and discriminate against white males in modern society Before you answer what would be reason for this, for example Neo-Nazis aren't suppose to like blacks and jews because they are inferior to white males but "control " certain sectors of society So if we as white males are the victims of bigotry from certain groups like rad fems what would be the reason? I just think certain people dislike males..not just white males ?" I don't feel that there is a covert campaign, Is that there is an overt campaign against them. But just like every baddie in History no one goes advertising that they are baddies, otherwise Hitler's "Final Solution" would have been called "The Super Evil plan to kill all Jews". SJWs and fringe feminist go against what they perceive to be a hostile value system by creating one that is hostile to whom they perceive to be the major aggressors (White Cis Males). Your neo-nazi example is pointless since affirmative action forces employers to fill diversity quotas, and it is moot because two wrongs don't make a right. The anti-white sentiment seems to be closely associated with white guilt and has come out from academia where liberal professors openly promote anti white ideas. and for contrast whitegenocideproject.com/us-splc-harrass-teacher-hes-under-investigation-for-his-beliefs/ Tenure aside it is pretty ****ed up that teachers can get away with racism just because is against whites. Yes, there are some racial, sexist tensions within the SJWs that run the gamut from just hating white males to all males or to all whites regardless of gender. Even seen conversations where PoC deny a white woman's possibility of sexual trauma because of her race. Bruce, how often do you talk to these people and where? Cause I get the feeling that we have two completely opposite views of what an SJW is.

It says something about my view of Bio romances that I actually thought that was in the game somewhere. He was also James Vega, it seems that he's a stand in for burly muscular BW characters.

The problem is with the totalitarian nature of SJWs which see everyone outside of their belief system as the enemy, if you're not a feminist then you're a misogynist, if you doubt or question the story of a victim because the story doesn't make sense to you then you're victim blaming, so on and so forth. They are as bad as the troll, racists and misogynist they claim hound them, except that they believe that is all for the greater cause of equality. Also, no one cares about gays in games they've been there for years now. Games had a transsexual woman since the SNES era and that has been fine with everyone because games are not real. The only ones that got offended where the damn SJWs; some of which don't even play the games, they are being led by the nose by liars and con artists and they buy into the whole thing because of their problematic ideology. Really, what the **** do people care if we have prostitutes one GTA or if DA has gay dudes? But no one asked Target to remove DA because it might lead children to commit acts of sodomy. Really, when your people are so pro censorship how can you in good conscience say that it's about equality? Or are you pro censorship as well? Like exampled before with Sweden, it generally isn't the Internet SJW that make problems but the ones that have real influence. Which result in some pretty darned things like Thor being a woman and black Annie. Whereas if someone decided to remake Black Dynamite starring a white dude they would be decried as racist. Its the double standard which reveals that leftist equality disguises sentiments of anti-masculinity and anti-white and you cannot defend yourself because resistance means that you're a misogynist racist.

What gave it away? Was it when "Kiss Me" played when you were romancing him?

There is just speculation at this point but the news aren't really trustworthy sources nowadays, the US news has come under criticism by former members who saw it as propaganda centers. It may be that they have continuing relationship and they don't want to rock the boat. That seem to be true of a lot of major US outlets that seem content to tell the narrative, if it wasn't for GG I probably would not have an idea of how eschewed things are.

Come to South Africa, where I live we never ever get snow Is it because of the Apartheid snow is segregated so it only snows on white people?

This is a good time for me to debunk your standard conspiracy theory logic , I dont often do this but I am finding this article interesting Also I know you are an intelligent person so it always surprises me the most when intelligent people believe these types of stories and then believe the rest of us are missing "obvious truths ". For me its not obvious as I'll explain below And thats the interesting part of disproving most conspiracy theories, they are illogical at there core So the premise of the article is that the hack was done by an ex-employer and Sony and the USA goverment are covering up this crime and shifting blame...okay lets break that down a bit There are numerous examples of hackers penetrating various large corporations security measures fairly regularly. Yes this is embarrassing but it happens so why would Sony not feel the need to be honest about the real hacker? Why would the USA government be complicent in a lie like this, SONY was hacked not the USA so you can't really think that the FBI would get involved publically unless there was a real risk of corporate espionage. In this case they are concerned because the crime was committed by another country and not the likes of LULZ. The FBI wouldn't make such an accusation against another country unless there was evidence...and they have ways through programs like Prism to confirm this. So the real question is why do you think the FBI would lie and protect SONY? One should ask themselves who is funding these stories? Face it, traditional news are actually less trustworthy than online media since you can't follow it to the source and because people scrutinize online more due to anonymity of sources. Nowadays news carry one merely on the perception of what they used to be, but they don't bother to fact check and neither do the people. It seems everyone believes that someone would call them out on it. But will you ever hear of it if its not on the news? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/10/leading-german-journalist-admits-cia-bribed-leaders-western-press.html