Lexx

Nah, I started to look like some kind of old hippy from the late 70s. For a while that might have been my style, but not anymore. :>

Funny, got pretty much the same hair cut. My sides are getting very "fluffy" fast, which looks crappy and annoys the hell out of me... so I let 'em getting cut that short at least every 3 weeks. Had super long hair just a few years back, but I started to get bald (yay...), so everything had to go. All in all, I think my head looks a lot better with short hair, but the balding still doesn't help it really. :>

That's why it is a spin-off. This doesn't turn me off that much, because I know and see it as just that: A spin-off. But I find the controls somewhat wonky. Also most of the time I feel like I am just mashing buttons, hoping to hit something. Also somehow the game wants me to go stealthy, but as far as I've experienced, this is pretty much not possible most of the time, or it just doesn't make much sense.

Metal Gear Rising. It is... interesting. I'll probably continue playing, but it doesn't get me that much, to be honest. Guess the only reason why I continue playing is because it's set in the Metal Gear universe.

Nope, FNV doesn't really take much from the old Van Buren. I don't think it's a good idea to make a non-Fallout Van Buren "Remake". I find it kind of pointless.

Funny, bought MGR as well recently. Not too sure what to think of it, though. Also the performance is a little.. wonky. Runs good ingame, but every menu is lagging like hell.

https://www.change.org/p/ea-games-remove-anita-sarkeesian-from-mirror-s-edge-2-game-development/share So apparently Sarkeesian is somehow involved in Mirror's Edge2? Haven't heard anything about it till right now. /edit: Just googled it a bit more, and it seems to be just some random BS? No idea.

This is like the best thing I've read in a while:

Oh god, if I had known you can make this much money with that crap, then I'd totally tried to buy one. Damn, I just didn't expected people to be crazy like this...

I can't remember Dandelion being a playable character in TW2. But we did jump into the roles of some other minor characters every once in a while- and it felt super annoying, imo. I didn't liked these parts at all. I was like "damn, can I get back to the real game now?" The Witcher 3 thing sounded as if the other character will be playable for longer... Though, of course, chances are ok-ish that it will be the same as in TW2.

Well, adopting it now would be super silly. AoD is very advanced and it just wouldn't give any real benefits to them. It's a pretty good rpg / adventure game, by the way.

So I've heard that you won't be playing as Geralt all of the time. My guess is that Ciri will be playable too. Kinda sux, as I only want to play as Geralt. Guess they need to create a bridge for future Witcher games.

Dunno. They were able to use many assets from Age of Decadence, which saved them money and time in any case. Also they share developers, which also means less time (and money) spend on people who first have to learn everything.

I actually kind of hope that when you finish the main storyline with Gat, that you'll be able to continue the rest of the game with your original character. As cool as Gat is, I still like the stupid face of my hero more. After all........ ........... ........ ... He is the hero Steelport the universe deserves.

Well, you get even more powers now... Demonic powers. :> I don't mind it. Driving cars isn't exactly what made the games fun to me.

So does that mean I should not yet start playing?

New Gat Out of Hell trailer:

If that's some multiplayer / whatever game, then you surely know what kind of characters the people will create. http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/001/030/dickbutt.jpg

It's pretty much this. You see a friend playing a game and check it out. Then you might or might not buy it. Though, you can get the same from watching youtube videos, imo.

Haha that's actually pretty good. I think I can live with that.

I actually like this version:

Played some Ryse on the console that is my pc. It took me a few hours before I figured out that the quick time event colors are actually the button colors of the xbox controller. lolz. Now many things make a lot more sense to me. When I first fiddled with the game I used mouse + keyboard and I couldn't stop but going "what the heck do you want from me?" at the tutorial text popups. The graphics are really stunning. Even on low graphic settings it looks way better than most other games. Now if just the combat would be more fun... IMO the game fails a lot due to tedious and unfun combat. Also the story is stupid and I've got no idea from where the developers took their roman history knowledge (probably all the Hollywood movies). There is so much wrong in this game... It's almost as if they slapped everything into the game that random folks would connect with romans. An emperor with the name Nero, the main character must be a Marius, everyone is running around in Lorica Segmentata armor (of course pimped with modern age style details), ... Meh. This game could be good with some changes here and there. The way it is now, it's just mediocre at best. Graphics simply don't make a game.

I'll doubt it would be console only. A console first, pc version later release would still suck, though. Mass Effect 4 is pretty much the only BioWare game I'd still would play.

You are a: Socialist Multilateralist Humanist Liberal Collectivism score: 67% Authoritarianism score: 0% Internationalism score: 67% Tribalism score: -50% Liberalism score: 33% Is that good or bad? I have no idea.