Bos_hybrid

It is interesting, but short, and a little bit weird. Would happily buy/kickstart a sequel though.

Is so very very annoying. Once you get more comfortable with the controls you shouldn't have this problem. I've been playing most of the day, and haven't had this issue a single time. Maybe it's just me, seven hours and I'm still doing it.

God damn it, you stole my Asian medic. They even wear the same clothes. I demand justice.

Been playing it for a few hours so far and I'm really enjoying, surprised to be honest. -Thought the keyword system would annoy me more, thought it might seem like the dialogue wheel, but I'm fine with it. Although full lines are still more preferable. -Really like how the skills have been incorporated into the game. Most excessive use of skill checks I've seen in a long time. -Combat is decent, it seems a bit easy but then I started on what would probably be the normal equivalent. -Obviously the most glaring flaw are the graphics, pretty poor by today's standards. Could see it being an issue for some. -Did find the AG centre dragged a little, and those annoying spore bombs. And this: Is so very very annoying.

So do you have to register to the site? Or does it recognize a WL2 account?

Dragon Commander had it. It's just that the RTS stuff is pretty poor. I also felt the Dragon Knight saga had it too. D:OS, not so much.

Don't jinx us. Most of them are yet to be released.

I feel sorry for someone that full of hate. Good to know that the SJWs are showing their true colors though. Maybe you guys should create a thread dedicated to men where some of you can openly dismiss and make a mockery of gender equality under the guise that it is " satire" and "just a joke" so you are free from moderation. That not a bad idea, oh wait...you already have a thread like that What does that have to do with what you quoted?

http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20140906VL200.html

As you mentioned I cant possibly respond to every single comment, but also most of the comments don't require separate answers because the points are basically the same " I am offended by the characterisation of the word gamer. I don't like what they are saying about me" If 5 people say the same thing but use different words to express there outrage I don't need give 5 different answers, I just need to say " no guys gaming journalists aren't saying that about all gamers" and then post a link to support my view like I did with the RPS article But yes I am limited due to time by how much I can respond, its not a deliberate attempt to ignore anyone This is True Neutrals post at the end of last thread. This was your reply. I've been assured by people supporting the journalists that this is not the case, which is the problem. These journalists carry weight and have reach - the moment those articles went up, the connection has been made and some of their readers went on the attack. No half-hearted retraction such as the one from Rock Paper Shotgun is going to matter. What do you think the word " gamer" means in this topic? Every single person who plays games? White males who play games or something else? Ignoring vast parts of post you disagree with, and picking out a certain bit, is trollish behaviour. You say nothing about the bulling and narcissism that both SJW, game journalist and indie devs repeatedly exhibit on twitter/blogs, and focus on 'they didn't mean all gamers' just white male misogynistic one. Despite the fact journalists and quack indie devs, think they need to come up with a new name for themselves to distinguish themselves from the awful evil male gamer. Not once was as amendment made by the journalist/indies/SJW, which said 'by gamers we mean the asshats that comment on twitter/articles' why? Because by then the journalist realized that a huge number of gamers were questioning their validity in not just posting reviewing/previewing games, but there sanctimonious armchair moralizing(click bait). You ignore the women and minorities that are behind #gamergate #NotYourShield. Instead you constantly bring up, 'oh they didn't mean all gamers, just the misogynistic ones'. Sorry Bruce, but that excuse failed long ago.

Typical response when you don't agree with someone... "lets play the old troll card" instead of engaging in debate Bruce you don't properly engage in debates. You ignore vast parts of post or altogether skip them. Maybe it's because you're a lone SJW (and only have so many tentacles), but when you ignore/skip posts that counter your views, but respond with "this is a very well reasoned post and people should read this" to every post that share your viewpoint, you look like a troll(or are trolling). It's not because Malc and others don't agree with you that they call you a troll. It's because you exhibit troll behavior. Intentionally or not.

I should of became a photographer.

Only bet on Australia in Cricket or Rugby.

Keep information. Sounds a lot like Crossroad keep, which was the best part of NWN2.

Have yet to see ONE journalist say anything against this. Sure plenty of bloggers and Youtube personalities have, but not one from a single major gaming site. Therefore one must assume they all hold the view. Or been told to have this view.

Shows the mental deficiencies that some SJW have. But no one should paint all SJW with the same brush right? Pity it doesn't work that way for 'gamers'. Instead some asshat threatens rape and all of a sudden we are all degenerate women hating chauvinists. And what do you mean with SJW (paint people with same brush so that they are easier to attack?)? You mean like the term 'gamer'. Probably, I haven't read any of the so called gamergate articles so I can't be sure how term is used and who it is targeted at. But if I would guess I would say that it probably is similar, although I am bit skeptic that it is used same way to invalidate anything that people with different view of things are tried to silence as SJW is here and many other forums in internet Current Journalists: If you criticize us, your a gamer(gamer now being a rape threatening chauvinist) and therefore any criticism you level against are questionable ethics and professionalism is invalid. To prove it we'll link to some asshats threatening rape against Anita, and insulting ZQ. And say nothing about the pretty damning claims made by other outlets. Now we are going to create a new name for gamers that can distinguish ourselves from the petty evil 'gamer'.

Shows the mental deficiencies that some SJW have. But no one should paint all SJW with the same brush right? Pity it doesn't work that way for 'gamers'. Instead some asshat threatens rape and all of a sudden we are all degenerate women hating chauvinists. And what do you mean with SJW (paint people with same brush so that they are easier to attack?)? You mean like the term 'gamer'.

Shows the mental deficiencies that some SJW have. But no one should paint all SJW with the same brush right? Pity it doesn't work that way for 'gamers'. Instead some asshat threatens rape and all of a sudden we are all degenerate women hating chauvinists.

I don't like being labeled with certain definitions and labels. But I'm quite happy to support the kill gamer campaign and do so to others. Keep being an SJW. (One rule for me and those with my viewpoint, another for others with a different viewpoint.)

aka The imaginary boogie boogie man.

Not a fan. Only 8 abilities in the toolbar? And no ability to add more bars, poor.

To be honest, I haven't seen a post saying 'women don't play games'. Most posts have been about how mobile and facebook games may skew the statistics towards adult females being the majority demographic. Lot's of women play video games, I just don't think they are the majority when talking about console and gaming PC's..... Yet.

I'll would have to agree here. While it's obvious that there is a lot more female gamers these days, I would suspect the majority of console and gaming PC owners would be male. Especially gaming PC's.

There goes the forums.