Blank

What about the TOMBS reports? They weren't a member proper on the forum, but I'm sure they were a member in the hearts of many posters.

Dear thepixiesrock, I don't know how to tell you this, but you're a loser. I think I realised it when you put cuffs on me in women's clothing, and forced me to watch you castrate my Kid Rock collection. I'm sure you are Level 24 Monk enough to understand that I've done a sex change on account of this. I'm returning your Mark Hammill poster to you, but I'll keep my virginity as a memory. You should also know that I always felt dirty seeing your Richard Simmons imitations. Good luck at Space Camp this year, Blank

As I recall, you wanted to fed-ex smuggle into Mission's. As I heard, he wanted to missions smuggle fed-ex. Dang, that didn't work.

CtrlAltDel's take.

1. Or one could say it leads to less disputes. The trick is in balance: do not be stifled by a stance of over-caution/fear, nor be besmirched by a stance of insensitivity/tactlessness, where the former stance eliminates conflict, yet renders one flavorless, and where the latter incites dislike or even disgust in a people's prevailing opinion. 2. That assumes "religion" in general esteems humility. 3. But what if your mother is always getting hit by a car?

I recently discovered I rather enjoy some cheesy anime, like Fruits Basket and Host Club. Also, I watched all of Blood+ and I recommend the series.

You know, because that stuff is gambling and dirty. Stock markets are clean and make sense, like buying pet diarrhetic sheep.

Paste or wax polish? And the conditioner is a dollar extra.

When considering a question of morality, one should look at both points of view from the worst possible situation. In a pro-life standpoint, one might consider a future where impregnating and aborting is commonplace, and pregnancy holds no reverence. From a pro-choice view, one looks at an impoverished, raped woman with no support from anyone. Surely there lies unsettling ultimatums on both sides of the extreme points of view here: the magic of child-bearing replaced with a cold calculation of whether having a child or not is convenient; or the involuntary, painstaking labor to care for a child which a wrongful action wrought. Who am I to tell a woman she can or cannot do something? I have no right to make her do or refrain from doing something, for it is her body and she owns the impregnated egg, right? Then who is a woman to decide the fate of a conglomeration of cells which in several months form a human who has inalienable rights? A matter of months, and the morality of the issue is clear that aborting would be murder. Can such a sensitive subject be legally decreed one way or the other? But it already has been decreed, for years in fact. Can a consensus be formed, a democratic decision on morality? Now if morality is defined by a consensus of humanity, can that morality be trusted? Those which created the morality innately must trust it, but history tells of horribly flawed consensuses. If the party of pro-life bears the true morality, the situation is one of life and death in every instance. If the party of pro-choice bears the true morality, however, the situation deals with a type of convenient choice, or choice which puts the fertilized egg bearer in an easier position labor-wise, excepting complicated births and raperegnancies.

I think people can have a best friend and a passionate relationship in their marriage. One must work at it, but it is surely possible to sustain such a thing. Over time it would, of course, take different forms, but friendship isn't destroyed by passion. To excite passion I believe one must think on an intimate level toward his or her significant other. A true best friendship fosters the environment for the emotional side of the relationship: passion. Or maybe this is idealistic garbage. But I believe it, and I believe the results of the efforts are worth working at for the rest of my life with my future wife.

I have no way to defend myself or those I love. I suppose I would pray until the zombies burst into my home, then I'd slit my throat before I changed.

Primitive, but maybe that's just what the zombies aren't expecting.

I haven't been here in a while, so I don't really notice it. But for the record I voted yes, and I think it's great.

rawr.