Volourn

"Canadians are wanking themselves over this on news sites here, rather funny that. Wonder what type of gun she had." They shouldn't be since we just had a mass murder committed in our country. "As for using guns to overthrow the government, good luck with that. The greatest weapon against the government in a revolution is going to be the media and the ability to spread information. You aren't going to compete against the military, you want the military to turn against the government with you." It's been done before. It is unlikely but not out of the realm possibility. It's not simply about outshooting the army. It's about forcing the army to ultimiately make a choice between mass murdering civlians or obeying the gov't's threat of murdering them for treason.

"And now GamerGate is doxxing Chrus Kluwe." Kluwe doxxed himself. He's a former NFLer who was in the public eye well before Gamergate. Big deal about doxxiing. I have doxxed myself in the past. Not a biggie. Unwanted doxxing is lame and only wussies go out of their way to do it yet you continually defend doxxing of GGers. Why is that? besdies, isn't anti GGers the tools who want the internet not to me anonymous and have everyone be forced to post with their real names? On top of that, yeah there are scumbags on GGer's side. They're pieces of crap. They are a lot more idiots and scumbags on anti GG's side. These are the people who attack women specifically because they are women,. These are the people who dox others repeatedly. they rape, they murder, they kill, they assassinate, they enslave, they manspalin, they they threaten. Yet, these are nazis you repeatedly defend. WHY? Why do you defend nazis? You anti GGers also ignore repeatedly the anti GG evil brigade. You didn't even actually reply to the person who answerred to you. Same as Bruce who hasn't yet stated why he feels he has the right to mansplain to my neice and how he has the right to ban her from playing a game she enjoys. That's evil and cowardly and sexist. A man telling a woman what she can and cannot do. HOW IS THAT ACCEPTABLE!?!

Uh.. Only the Inquisitor can close rifts....

"do you feel that there is a covert and orchestrated campaign from some circles to attack and discriminate against white males in modern society" \Yes. If you think otherwise you are insane and aren't even paying attention to your very own rhetoric. \"What's wrong with black Annie?"\ Niothing wrong with a black Annie. In fact, the new movie looks like it can be fun. The problem here is the reason why a black Annie was chosen? Was it chosen because the actress/actors would work or was it to push some sort of agenda? Then again, it's a remake, so most people will hate on it just because. Not me though. Looks solid. "Why not create a new female character similar to Thor instead of changing the original?" Yup. True for lots of stuff. Like the idea there should be a black version of Bond. Why can't there just be a movie series started about a black spy? Heck, aren't there movies with exactly that? Why Bond? It's pure pure PC anti white agenda. I even like the idea of the black actor to play him. He's pretty good but why not just have him start his own spy franchise.... \ \I know why. SJWs are evil bigoted, hateful garbage. I still have yet to receive an explanation why Bruce feels its okay for him to mansplain to my neice why she isn't allowed to play a game she enjoys. It's been like a month now. L0L

"his record is crazy good. " No, it isn't. 8-8 is not 'crazy good'. It's merely middle of the road. Also, he makes poor decisions starting with taking the wrong QB.

``This is a brand new pathetic in text sizes. For pete's sake, offer SD text sizes as well. I can't bloody read the menus. It's worse than Stick of Truth. Why are all developers so bloody stupid now when it comes to this? There was nothing wrong with text sizes 5+ years ago. Just because you can make them smaller doesn't mean that you should. Or if you do want to, offer bigger text sizes as well.`` Get glasses. The text is easily readable. ``You've got to be kidding, DA2 was a terrible game, DA:I is better by a mile. I don't even know how you can prefer DA2 over DA:I. `DA2 is better. Tat`s why. DA3 is way overrated.

Wasn't there that movie with the middle age man who dragged a little girl into mass murdering a bunch of civllians because they were mildly 'annoying' releasde just a eyar or two a ago? the outrage was minimal, it was released with barely a blip, and the world didn't fall a part. Cesnorship is about cowardice, power, and control. It's about mansplaining to young women on what games to play or not play, what movies to watch or not watch, etc., etc. This is why SJWs are evil to the core. They believe in slavery and mass murder. That's DISGUSTING. And, they hate young women. That's for darn sure.

Funny that people whine that police brutality is based on racism (it isn't it's based on police having way too much power and forgetting what their job is supposed to entail) yet neither of the cops savagely murdered were actually white.. I'd laugh but it's too morbidly sadly disgusting.

"Inquisition is no better or worse than DA:O" It is worse. Even KOTOR is arguably better. As for the 'critic/user reviews'. They are useless garbage. Too much people - on both sides - voting just for gigles. Too many high and low ratings likely were chosen ebfore the game was even released. And, no doubt too many 'voters' haven't even played the game or had their mind set pre playing. \\ Plus, some people oppose BIO for 'political' reasons. See Q in this thread. Q likely is one of the voters who gave it a 0 because they kicked Q out of the fourms. *shrug* That's why the opinion that matters is mine. PERIOD.

Geez. You people are fizted on me a little too much. Stop trolling me. I'm not that important. As for the game. It's playable but it's overrated. And, of course, the usual haters are hating because they are pathetic.

"Volo, I believe this is where you normally say all cops are scum. Please do so then I'll continue. " I've defended cops before. I even defended the stupid cop who killed Brown. now, the Garner case. There is no justifible reason for the piece of crap cop doing what he did. In this case, if the reporting is accurate which i believe it is, the obvious scumbag is the shooter.\ \Now, go play your insane trolling game with someone else. Thank you.

"...The more I see of this guy Volourn, the more looks like his rep is well deserved. Odd." \ Go troll someone else. You give me way more importance than I have. I am nobody. Let's keep it that way.

Washing and dyeing are NOT the same thing. One is needed to keep clean and help them remain safe from germs and other illnesses. One is for fun. I'll let you figure out which is which.

"Games have become whole lot better in terms of storytelling recently, uh-huh." It's true. And, using PST as your one go to is weak. PST is the exception that proves the rule.

Yeah, that's the main thing. The dog looks absolutely miserable. Even if the dye itself caused no issues.. shouldn't you want your animal be happy? That dog looks like it wants to die.

Jealousy? Insanity? Stupidity? Evilness?

"You seem to be missing point, we all should agree it was stupid thing to do" You seem to be missing the point. "But she dyed her dog out of a misplaced sense of affection. She wanted her dog to look like her, she wanted them to be even closer" I adopted a black girl. I wanted her to look like me so I put her through multiple surgeries to lighten her skin and give her a ****. I did this out of affection. I wanted my adopted child to look like me. I wanted to be even closer. YOU SEE HOW DUMB THAT IS? "It wasn't malicious so I question the level of abuse you can sincerely level at her ?" Malicious or not, it's nazism to the core. Trying to control, bully, intimidate, and humilate a living creature for your own amusement, power, and satisfactuion. EVIL.

So, she tried to murder someone because they cut her fof? EVIL. Plus, insane thinking she has special powers. To the looney bin with her.

Of course, it's bad taste. But, big deal.

The Hobbit > LOTR

Pure cowardice.

"I bet you guys in the west don't even have a word for woman warrior isn't it?" We do. It's called warrior. We ain't as sexist as you having to make up words where one already exists. A warrior is a warrior is a warrior. The ME also has a special word for women: lesser being. The truth hurts, right? Bottom line is women are better off in the western world than the ME world. Then again, so are men. Or children. Or animals. Trust me on that.

I win yet again.

"No need to try to marginalize the role that women played in history ( and yes military contribution is part of that ), I know this suits your idea of the gender role but my advice is try not to generalize. Its sexist and inaccurate " Huh? You are the sexist one. Youa re thje one who thinks women shouldn't be allowed to play sports. \Again, you are lying. Nowhere did I say women had no role in past history (military or otherwise) but it's historical fact they weren't largely in front of war. Of note, youa re now twisting the feminist/SJW mantra that if 'women had power' there'd be no wars. L0L So, which is it? Were women en masse involved in war at the same level as men or all women peace loving hippies? You cna't have it both ways you anti women sexist pig. Also, your link is laughable. If women had all this power how the ehck were men compeltely (well not quite apparantly) erase them from history? Again, you just randiomly spam stuff hioping it sticks. \ FACT: Women have played important roles in military history but not as much as men did. This is historical fact. \ P.S. Nothing in your link disproves my position on this. Not one thing.

"Actually its not, there are many cases of women being involved on various levels historically in military conflicts. But there contribution was and is overlooked by narrators and some historians" Actually, it is. Historically speaking, women are an extremely low percentage of military conflicts. How much involvement do you think they had? 20%? 40%? 50%? Whatever number it was they surely wweren't as involved as men. 'Hiding their contributions' doesn't change the fact. But, hey, start naming names. Give me 100 and I bet someone could give 1000 names of men. I'm all for equality but I also believe in not changing historical fact for the 'feels'.