Guard Dog

Timing is everything: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2016/06/19/mourners-in-awe-as-rainbow-appears-over-massive-orlando-vigil/

Unbelievable ending. I thought Lebron broke his wrist on that missed dunk. But that last free throw proves to be important. This has got to be bitter for the Warriors.

Which are more dangerous Bruce; Sunni terrorists or Shia terrorists. ISIL is only one of those. But they are all radical islam. If there is a bear rampaging through the forest killing hikers and the hunter shows up and talks in vague terms about stopping dangerous animals you would have a hard time taking him seriously wouldn't you? Barack Obama is generally thought of as being a weak man here in the US. Buy refusing to even identify the root cause of the problem he only reinforces that notion both at home and abroad. Not an apples to apples comparison but take a look at the contrast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfKGUF9uDxU

GD that whole " Obama\Clinton " wont say the words " Radical Islam " is nothing but Obama-bashing ....dont believe it for a second http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-defends-not-saying-radical-islam-what-would-that-accomplish.html Are you kidding? You don't even live here and hear the news broadcasts we hear. Nearly every word out of their mouths is broadcasted. We know what they say and don't say far better than anyone ever will who isn't here 24-7. And for reasons all their own they won't say "radical islam" in the same sentence as terrorism. And by taking the unprecedented step of censoring them from the shooters own mouth it looks like they won't let him say it either. But in this instance I was talking about the US Attorney General Loretta Lynch. To hear her describe it last week you'd think two guns walked into that club and shot those people all by themselves. Oh no, you playing the old " Bruce you dont live in the USA, you cant know more than me " ....thats what LK said to me. It was inconsequential then and its inconsequential now, sorry buddy I respect your intelligence to much to pander to that silly point Of course its possible I could be right about something in the USA that you dont agree with, this is a good example. The reason is " The answer is none of the above. Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction " Of course this makes sense, ask Gromnir or other people what they think I'm saying there isn't an idea behind them not calling out radical Islam by name. Whether I agree with it or not. But it cannot be denied they will not say the words... and people notice and draw their own conclusions.

GD that whole " Obama\Clinton " wont say the words " Radical Islam " is nothing but Obama-bashing ....dont believe it for a second http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-defends-not-saying-radical-islam-what-would-that-accomplish.html Are you kidding? You don't even live here and hear the news broadcasts we hear. Nearly every word out of their mouths is broadcasted. We know what they say and don't say far better than anyone ever will who isn't here 24-7. And for reasons all their own they won't say "radical islam" in the same sentence as terrorism. And by taking the unprecedented step of censoring them from the shooters own mouth it looks like they won't let him say it either. But in this instance I was talking about the US Attorney General Loretta Lynch. To hear her describe it last week you'd think two guns walked into that club and shot those people all by themselves.

I started building the frame for the cabinets in an outdoor kitchen I've always wanted to build,

The biggest lie in Presidential history... after the one about the WMDs, or the one about not having sex with Monica, or "Read my lips", or "I am not a crook", or "I did not trade arms for hostages" or "Iran is an island of stability in a turbulent corner of the world", or “I have previously stated, and I repeat now, that the United States intends no military intervention in Cuba.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xxCVENhSq9M

AG Loretta Lynch says the 9-11 transcripts will have all references to ISIS, radical Islamic terrorism, and everything else that makes the administration uncomfortable edited out of them prior to release. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/06/19/lynch_partial_transcript_of_orlando_911_calls_will_have_references_to_isis_cut_out.html

I watched The Martian on HBO. I loved it. I loved the book, loved the movie.

Damn those red shirts! That is sad though,

There is nothing "Christian" about praying for people to die. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to spend a little more time reading their bible rather than thumping it.

Top this one Raithe!

How long do you think someone deserves to go to prison for being an idiot? And, another thing to consider; locking her up won't change her being a racist. Perhaps she should be killed? After all it's the only way you can be absolutely sure she will not say bad things or think bad thoughts in the future. No we dont need to kill anyone, once we see real legal consequences for these types of comments these types of public statements will stop But they will still THINK them Bruce! Don't you see? It doesn't make a difference if they say them... they are THINKING them! Sooner or later a thought will slip out or they will bet mad and blurt it out and the cause of civil rights will be set all they way back to apartheid. Kill them... kill them all. That is the only way to be sure! The only other option will be to create a new government department and remand everyone who thinks racist thoughts over to them to be re-educated. Maybe after years of intense physical and psychological torture, I mean therapy you can correct their thinking. You can even call that new agency "The Ministry of Love". Catchy isn't it? This is what I have never explained, what would you say if I told you that racial tension has the potential to undermine and collapse the new South Africa. Would that change your mind.....now this would be a unique perspective because this would never happen in the USA but please understand it does have the potential Not really. If the racist screed of one idiot who has no power to do anything but piss people off is enough to collapse a whole country into a race war I suggest you get out now because it is inevitable. If someone says something offensive the proper course is to criticize them, shame them, vilify them or ignore them. Not lock them up.

How long do you think someone deserves to go to prison for being an idiot? And, another thing to consider; locking her up won't change her being a racist. Perhaps she should be killed? After all it's the only way you can be absolutely sure she will not say bad things or think bad thoughts in the future. No we dont need to kill anyone, once we see real legal consequences for these types of comments these types of public statements will stop But they will still THINK them Bruce! Don't you see? It doesn't make a difference if they say them... they are THINKING them! Sooner or later a thought will slip out or they will bet mad and blurt it out and the cause of civil rights will be set all they way back to apartheid. Kill them... kill them all. That is the only way to be sure! The only other option will be to create a new government department and remand everyone who thinks racist thoughts over to them to be re-educated. Maybe after years of intense physical and psychological torture, I mean therapy you can correct their thinking. You can even call that new agency "The Ministry of Love". Catchy isn't it?

How long do you think someone deserves to go to prison for being an idiot? And, another thing to consider; locking her up won't change her being a racist. Perhaps she should be killed? After all it's the only way you can be absolutely sure she will not say bad things or think bad thoughts in the future.

1) I don'y like the fact the that the complete text of the agreement is not being made public. The Obama Admin is big on secret laws that "We need to pass so we can see what's in them" to quote Nancy Pelosi. Obama wants (and has received) fast track track process. Thant means no congressional debate, no public reading, etc. What is Barack Obama hiding? 2) It expands intellectual property rights in ways that would be easily described as ant-competitive. It would make it impossible to create generic drugs based on formulas made by companies in member nations. There are time limits of exclusivity now, thise time limits would be radically expanded. Plus it would allow patents on non material things. For example a medical procedure could be patented. The biggest problem with healthcare in any country is out of control costs. This will make that problem worse. 3) The US has lost close to 70k jobs to Mexico and Canada due NAFTA. That is just two countries over 20 years. TPP involves 12 countries (IIRC) several of whom sport labor conditions that bear little difference from slavery. 4) Corporations based in member nations will have equal footing with governments of other member nations. In other words a company based in Australia would have standing to sue the United States government over labor practices that apply only to the US.

Well if it's any consolation the whole Rio Olympics appear to be teetering on the brink of disaster.

The elected Republicans do favor it because it's a lot of money to business interests but it's unemployment to the rank and file GOP voter. There is an old saying about riding a tiger. It's a lesson the GOP has never learned.

Rep Randy Forbes of Virginia has lost a Primary challenge because of his support for TPP (now commonly referred to as Obamatrade apparently... hey it's WND, what do you expect). If Paul Ryan loses his Primary challenge you will all hear me laughing no matter where in the world you are! Forgot the link: http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/obamatrade-cost-gop-congressman-his-job/#!

Plus you know what they say about them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gfRtgMWUgs Well I'd take that one in a heartbeat. Especially is I could get her to say "You know nothing" in a russian accent.

You never heard me say such a thing. Thats true but you do agree there is a degree of distrust towards certain US government programs from many people Whats the happy medium GD, so for example how would we convince people the real threat to the US can be prevented by the likes of Prism so how do you accept it and at the same time not think the government has questionable motives for these types of initiatives ? I believe a measure of distrust of the government is a healthy thing. Especially this government. Don't forget this is the administration that thinks it's perfectly OK to use the IRS to suppress political activity, censor political speech online and on the air, undermine the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 10th, & 14th amendments as well as Article I & ignoring article II when it suits. Oh yes, this is also the administration that thinks veterans are likely terrorists and that is is perfectly OK to kill Americans with weaponized drones and no due process. So why would they be surprised we don't trust them when they are monitoring every phone call and email exchange made in the country? As for your second comment I'll let the great American Benjamin Franklin speak for me: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." And they will have neither. There is a risk living in a free society. You must accept the former to enjoy the latter. Or give up the latter to eliminate the former.

I hope you did not bet on that. It is an even year. Yeah that didn't go well. Samardzija was hot tonight.

You never heard me say such a thing.