A few minutes later, their interpreter told them that two women in the compound were extremely distressed because their children were trapped behind a low wall about 25 yards away.
“I stuck my head out of the compound to have a look,” said the 25-year-old soldier.
He saw the boys, aged between three and seven, sheltering from the gunfire. “The children were stuck behind a small wall,” the corporal said. “They were too scared to move because of the incoming fire from the insurgents.”
Without thinking about his own safety, the soldier, whose girlfriend is five months pregnant, ducked under the volleys of machinegun fire while his fellow soldiers gave him covering fire.
He rushed over to the weeping boys, picked one of them up and ran straight back to the compound with him under one arm.
He then made a second dash to the wall, this time accompanied by his platoon commander, Capt James Cook. They rescued the two remaining children who ran straight into their mothers’ arms.
His citation read: “Acting on his own initiative and with complete disregard for his own personal safety, he ran across 25 metres of open ground in full view of the enemy to grab one of the children before using his own body as a shield.
“With any element of surprise gone, Taylor without hesitation exposed himself once more to repeat the journey.”
Cpl Taylor, from Birmingham, said the Afghan women were overjoyed on being reunited with their children.
“It was just the right thing to do,” he said.
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Meanwhile, an actual soldier...
#1
Posted 22 March 2012 - 11:21 PM
#2
Posted 22 March 2012 - 11:28 PM
#3
Posted 23 March 2012 - 02:05 AM
#4
Posted 23 March 2012 - 02:38 AM
This all wouldn't be necessary if the coalition forces just pulled out of this dirthole already. More lucky kids getting to know their daddies.
#5
Posted 23 March 2012 - 04:25 AM
#6
Posted 23 March 2012 - 04:51 AM
Brainwashing propaganda detected."I'm not a warrior, I'm a soldier. There's a difference. Warriors attack and conquer, they prey on the weak. Soldiers defend and protect the innocent—usually from warriors."
Soldier:
The word soldier entered modern English in the 14th century, from the equivalent Middle English word soudeour, from Anglo-French soudeer or soudeour, meaning mercenary, from soudee, meaning shilling's worth or wage, from sou or soud, shilling.[2] The word is also related to the Medieval Latin soldarius, meaning soldier (literally, "one having pay")3].
Warrior:
Anglo-Saxon
W?r meaning (true)
Noun w?r - (plural w?ra, or w?re)
truth, faith
fidelity, friendship
agreement, promise
Old English
Wær
faith fidelity keeping protection agreement treaty compact pledge covenant bond (of friendship)
#7
Posted 23 March 2012 - 05:53 AM
Predictable, and not very well done. Need to throw in some tidbit where the Imperialst soldiers killed some people or something, rather than some weak hypothetical. Tsk.
You're the one who is becoming predictable, my Canadian friend.
#8
Posted 23 March 2012 - 09:45 AM
#9
Posted 23 March 2012 - 10:41 AM
Brainwashing propaganda detected.
"I'm not a warrior, I'm a soldier. There's a difference. Warriors attack and conquer, they prey on the weak. Soldiers defend and protect the innocent—usually from warriors."
Soldier:The word soldier entered modern English in the 14th century, from the equivalent Middle English word soudeour, from Anglo-French soudeer or soudeour, meaning mercenary, from soudee, meaning shilling's worth or wage, from sou or soud, shilling.[2] The word is also related to the Medieval Latin soldarius, meaning soldier (literally, "one having pay")3].
Warrior:Anglo-Saxon
W?r meaning (true)
Noun w?r - (plural w?ra, or w?re)
truth, faith
fidelity, friendship
agreement, promise
Old English
Wær
faith fidelity keeping protection agreement treaty compact pledge covenant bond (of friendship)
Hilariously serious response for a Knights of the Old Republic quote.
#10
Posted 23 March 2012 - 02:14 PM
But seriously, this guy is a hero. Big time. Maybe there is some hope for the humans after all.
#11
Posted 23 March 2012 - 02:58 PM
I'm not sure there is an actual line that separates valor from stupidity, but it's fairly obvious that success is enough to sway most opinons one way or the other. And success does depend on luck. Funny how that works.
#12
Posted 23 March 2012 - 04:09 PM
#13
Posted 23 March 2012 - 04:51 PM
Even the bible agrees: John 15:13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. How much more so than to risk his life for strangers or their children?
Uh-oh I quoted the Bible on this forum. Methinks there will be flames!
#14
Posted 23 March 2012 - 07:20 PM
Waiting for the insurgents to break off would almost certainly have been a far better- if less 'heroic' and 'inspiring'- way of doing things.
#15
Posted 23 March 2012 - 11:14 PM
#16
Posted 24 March 2012 - 12:00 AM
Uh-oh I quoted the Bible on this forum. Methinks there will be flames!
Flames? No, but I do wonder why you'd think that what the bible says would hold any significance for us...
#17
Posted 24 March 2012 - 07:36 AM
Uh-oh I quoted the Bible on this forum. Methinks there will be flames!
Flames? No, but I do wonder why you'd think that what the bible says would hold any significance for us...
It's a pretty significant book, so I don't know why a quote from it would not be relevant to the discussion.
#18
Posted 24 March 2012 - 07:48 AM
As for morgoth's negativity it's so predictable it's almost soothing. Like watching a wave roll in.
#19
Posted 24 March 2012 - 09:04 AM
#20
Posted 24 March 2012 - 10:18 AM
You mean that a soldier's body is harder cover than a concrete wall? Wow, those must be some seriously tough soldiers!I think you missed the part where he was shielding the kids with his body.
Getting killed doesn't prevent you from getting a medal, ergo I'm kinda guessing it doesn't preclude you being heroic.
Yep. Undoubtedly, the mother of the kid's grieving would have been quickly ended by his son's would-be savior posthumous condecoration. And it's only a tiny measure of luck that changed that scenario to the one reported by the Telegraph.If risking your own life to save someone elses does not make you a hero I'm not sure what would. It is the definition of a selfless act.
But whatever, Zor already explained and apparently no one even read his post, so don't let me interrupt the chest-pounding.
Edited by 213374U, 24 March 2012 - 10:20 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
Sign In
Create Account



Back to top









