Jump to content

Welcome to Obsidian Forum Community
Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, post status updates, manage your profile and so much more. If you already have an account, login here - otherwise create an account for free today!
Photo

DLC vs Expansion Packs

DLC Expansion packs post launch

  • Please log in to reply
140 replies to this topic

Poll: DLC vs Expansion Packs (532 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you prefer new content in the form of DLC or full expansion packs?

  1. DLC only (3 votes [0.56%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.56%

  2. Expansion Packs only (408 votes [76.69%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 76.69%

  3. A mixture of DLC and Expansion Packs (121 votes [22.74%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 22.74%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1
Intoxicated_Ant

Intoxicated_Ant

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 16 posts
  • Location:Terra Australis
Regardless of what will happen, what would you personally prefer to see in terms of content being added post launch?
  • A system of DLC, such as in Mass Effect, where you pay a small fee for extra characters, armour, missions, etc
  • A system where you pay a larger fee for an expansion pack which adds onto the end of the game, like Throne of Bhaal for BG2
  • Or a system incorporating both together?


#2
Sammael

Sammael

    (6) Magician

  • Members
  • 750 posts
  • Location:Venal Fortress, Maladomini, Nine Hells of Baator
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
This is a purely commercial decision, not a developer/designer one, so, Feargus, if you're reading this: PLEASE. NO. DLC. WHATSOEVER.

Expansion packs, OTOH, are fine.
  • Jaesun, aVENGER, Amentep and 17 others like this

#3
Darji

Darji

    (5) Thaumaturgist

  • Members
  • 467 posts
  • Location:Germany
  • PSN Portable ID:Darji
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer

Regardless of what will happen, what would you personally prefer to see in terms of content being added post launch?

  • A system of DLC, such as in Mass Effect, where you pay a small fee for extra characters, armour, missions, etc
  • A system where you pay a larger fee for an expansion pack which adds onto the end of the game, like Throne of Bhaal for BG2
  • Or a system incorporating both together?



Personally I think they should work on the next game or on the toolset and than let the community do the rest.XD

but if DLC than like they did in New Vegas. That was actually really worth the money.
  • Lysen and Sonntam like this

#4
Infinitron

Infinitron

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2005 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
New Vegas DLC = expansion packs by another name
  • nikolokolus, WDeranged, Tychoxi and 13 others like this

#5
Intoxicated_Ant

Intoxicated_Ant

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 16 posts
  • Location:Terra Australis
Personally, I'm 100% for XPacks. I would also buy DLC, but mostly just cosmetic things. I'm never happy when a new character is introduced via DLC, I always feel like it's ruining my version of 'cannon' If that makes sense.
  • Skie Nightfall likes this

#6
The Sharmat

The Sharmat

    (7) Enchanter

  • Members
  • 847 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
Given modern distribution methods blurs the difference between the two, I guess we're primarily measuring DLC vs. Expansion Pack by amount of content? If that's the case I greatly prefer expansion pack levels of content to dozens of microtransactions.
  • Bryy and Sonntam like this

#7
mkreku

mkreku

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 8522 posts
  • Location:Uppsala, Sweden
Both. Why not? The more, the better.

Just make sure that it feels like additions to the game after the fact instead of cut out content that should have been included in the game to begin with. This is the only thing I dislike about DLC today.
  • Monte Carlo likes this

#8
Sarog

Sarog

    Cataphract of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 161 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
Just from a narrative point of view alone, I much prefer XPacks. A handful of episodic DLC adventures aren't nearly as satisfying as a singly lengthy chapter added to the primary storyline.
  • timobkg, Sacculina, Ieo and 3 others like this

#9
Seagloom

Seagloom

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 70 posts
  • Location:New York
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
I voted for the third option to express indifference toward either approach. Obsidian has been very good with DLC. Treasures of the Sun and the four New Vegas DLCs all added a nice amount of new content. As long as they maintain that standard of quality, DLC is fine by me. Ditto with expansion packs. Mask of the Betrayer was awesome stuff. Storm of Zehir, not as much, but it wasn't as if I felt ripped off paying full price for it.
  • Tychoxi and W.MacKinnon like this

#10
Tamerlane

Tamerlane

    (8) Warlock

  • Members
  • 1125 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
Expansion packs!

In the name of almighty Brood War!
  • Wolfenbarg likes this

#11
Shades

Shades

    (3) Conjurer

  • Members
  • 137 posts
  • Location:Bag of holding #396
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
I say expansion packs all the way, and only expansion packs. The problem with DLC is that, as we've seen with Dragon Age: Origins, keeping track of all those DLC decisions and getting them to transfer over properly into the next game seems to be a serious pain. Often DLC seems to be very small and because they're sold apart from the game they don't really mesh well with main storylines. Expansion packs fit together well, continue the story, and have a lot of content in them that doesn't seem stuck on.

But mostly I'm just old fashioned and love to have something that I can actually buy and put on my shelf.
  • Intoxicated_Ant likes this

#12
nikolokolus

nikolokolus

    Bridge Troll of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 1164 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
DLC like F:NV is fine because that added more actual playable content and entirely new story lines to explore, which are always fun, but if it's like the horrific crap Bethesda put in with Oblivion (3 dollars for non-fucntional horse armor for instance) then I want no part of it.

When it feels like a developer is just withholding something from the original release so they can chisel it out of you later because they know that people aren't going to want to feel like they're missing something, that's somewhat distasteful.
  • Intoxicated_Ant, Suen and Sonntam like this

#13
Labadal

Labadal

    Janitor of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 3928 posts
  • Location:Sweden
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Backer
  • Fig Backer
I'd prefer expansion packs everyday of the week. Release the original game and see how it goes. If you're happy with sales, then you start working on an expansion pack that continues the story of the original game or is a separate adventure. DLC packs can work for some games, and I have bought more DLC than I probably should have, but I don't see DLC working for this type of game.

#14
Reddie

Reddie

    (2) Evoker

  • Members
  • 81 posts
I hate DLCs with a passion. Not for what content they individually offer, but what they represent as a whole: tiny chunks of game with totally inadequate price.

Even if Project Eternity's DLC would not be like that, it would still be an endorsment of this practice. So, even if it gets down simply to naming decision: big no-no to DLC.
  • Lysen, Suen, buggeer and 1 other like this

#15
Intoxicated_Ant

Intoxicated_Ant

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 16 posts
  • Location:Terra Australis

When it feels like a developer is just withholding something from the original release so they can chisel it out of you later because they know that people aren't going to want to feel like they're missing something, that's somewhat distasteful.


A very valid point!

#16
Sarog

Sarog

    Cataphract of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 161 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
XPacks are also more transparent, in that you know that they constitute something separate from the original product's development phase. Companies that make use of DLC are more and more getting into murkey waters where they sell you content that is already on the disc you bought with the original product, justified with vague assurances of how the content that is already on your disc would never have existed if they hadn't allocated post-disc development time to it.
  • Bloody Hypocrite and Hellraiser789 like this

#17
gandalf.nho

gandalf.nho

    Huntress of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 44 posts
  • Location:Brazil
  • Pillars of Eternity Silver Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
Expansions packs without doubt

#18
Enoch

Enoch

    Arch-Mage

  • Members
  • 2985 posts
  • Location:Other Planes of There
  • Pillars of Eternity Gold Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
  • Deadfire Silver Backer
  • Fig Backer
This question is silly. It's purely a dog-whistle for traditionalists who want to vent about the way certain games publishers have used post-launch content over the last decade or so. The term "expansion pack" is meaningless, apart from the nostalgia-trigger-- do you think that you're going to walk into Wal-Mart and buy a box with a disc in it for $35? The only game that still works like that anymore is WoW.


It's way to early to be talking about this kind of thing, but the core principle for post-launch content remains the same as it was in 1997: Fans will be happy if you make good content and offer it at a fair price.

Edited by Enoch, 15 September 2012 - 05:19 PM.

  • timobkg and Sonntam like this

#19
Tychoxi

Tychoxi

    Sciscitator of the Obsidian Order

  • Members
  • 150 posts
  • Pillars of Eternity Backer
  • Kickstarter Backer
I voted both, yeah expansion packs are great, but DLC is not necessarily bad. I would believe in Obsidian to produce decent DLC (it adds to the game and is priced fairly), besides sometimes the distinction between DLC and EXPACK is so contrived! Technically expacks are DLC! where do you draw the line with between small expacks and large DLC? As long as it's not some crap made to cash-in I don't see any harm.

#20
Intoxicated_Ant

Intoxicated_Ant

    (1) Prestidigitator

  • Members
  • 16 posts
  • Location:Terra Australis

This question is silly. It's purely a dog-whistle for traditionalists who want to vent about the way certain games publishers have used post-launch content over the last decade or so. The term "expansion pack" is meaningless, apart from the nostalgia-trigger-- do you think that you're going to walk into Wal-Mart and buy a box with a disc in it for $35? The only game that still works like that anymore is WoW.


It's way to early to be talking about this kind of thing, but the core principle for post-launch content remains the same as it was in 1997: Fans will be happy if you make good content and offer it at a fair price.


I would disagree, In my view DLC are *usually* smaller content that has a single focus, for example a cosmetic pack, a single new side mission, new character, etc,

On the other hand XPacks tend to expand onto the end of the game. The distribution is irrelevent. An XPack can still be downloaded. But it contains more content then a single DLC pack.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: DLC, Expansion packs, post launch

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users