Gromnir

"pathetic"? am thinking the correct word is "surreal." you give us feedback regarding the site maintenance o' the game you got a needs to announce indifference regarding? Bwahhhhaaaahhhaaahhh! keep posting. please. HA! Good Fun!

coming from the guy who feels need to post at obsidian his indifference 'bout a beta invite to a bioware game he volunteered to be testing? first pretends as if sign-up were accidental before doing some silly and unnecessary backpedaling? rrrrriiiiiiigggghhhhhtttttt. am perhaps slandering vol by placing you in a similar category. HA! Good Fun! ps have fun in your beta weekend. anybody wanna take bets as to whether or not morg joins the beta... whether he admits or not?

more strawman. blow outta proportion by noting silliness and linking bugs bunny? *chuckle* and now you can recall checking box And your feelings at the time? you have convenient powers o' recollection. whatever. maroon. HA! Good Fun!

beat that strawman a bit harder. where did anybody claim you were a fanboy? and is no "oops." those things is pretty clear marked. you volunteered. you registered at forums AND volunteered for testing. now you gonna come to obsidian and announce indifference? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Kh7nLplWo HA! Good Fun!

to be selected you must needs have volunteered/applied. after having volunteered AND been selected, you then comes to an unrelated game developer's board to announce your indifference via a snarky post? ... you has clearly surpassed vol standards o' irrationality. HA! Good Fun! ps (edited) no need for us to repeat raithe.

Bioware are unable to do dark, only insane or duchy is not "can't." ... perspective can be useful. am recalling the thread on the da:o thread on the bio boards in which we pushed hard for the biowarins to explain their definition o' "dark." the thread were predictable chaos. you see, is pretty much impossible to find a definition o' "dark" that any sizable % o' people is gonna agree 'pon. even worse, the thread made it patently obvious that a very significant % o' bio-board posters didn't want anything that genuine smacked o' dark. a great many bio fans were quite clear that they were wanting traditional (which ain't genuine traditional) heroes, villains and situations in which they could affect "perfect" happily-ever-after resolutions. those demanding cotton candy and sunshine were numerous, and they were including more than a few vocal and respected community members. Gromnir were genuinely surprised at the resistance to "dark" even w/o a clear defined definition o' dark. bio response: da:o will be "dark, but not too dark." that is an actual quote. honest. hope for bio dark pretty much died that day. ask self how it is possible to write dark characters and scenario w/o those characters and scenario being too dark for the candylanders looking for happily ever afters for all. if you is genuine trying to satisfy the sunshine brigade's demands, you cannot possibly write dark... regardless o' your definition o' dark. is not that bio can't write dark, but they is making a conscious effort to keeps the happily-ever-after contingent satisfied. were quite possible the most disheartening game-board thread we ever read. HA! Good Fun!

Funnily enough all I smell is a man who hasn't mastered the arcane art of getting people to do things because they are fun and challenging. It's perfectly possible. _You_ simply can't do it. Which begs the question why you're so proud of that fact. Although it does explain why you are so hostile to the suggestion that it's easy. again with the nonsense. random guy at a skate park trying to tell us what is fun is bad enough, but suggesting that we should or would Buy random-guy suggestions? if you knew anything 'bout coaching, you would know that it ain't as easy as it looks, and getting kids to buy-in right from the start is extreme important. even then, telling us that you could get a bunch o' skater kids to purchase your challenge suggestions is so utter ridiculous that we not take any pride in being able to see through your nonsense. sure, if tony hawk (is tony hawk too old... we do not know current skater pantheon) showed up to a skate park and made suggestions, we bet kids would be falling all over themselves to complete suggested challenges, but even tony hawk would have a hard time Selling the challenges. Buy My Book of Challenge Suggestions. utter ridiculous. btw, am guessing you ain't tony hawk. lord knows we hope you ain't suggesting that you doing josh challenges is akin to skater kid wanting to impress tony hawk. well, at least wal has mastered the arcane art o' the absurd. btw, the game itself is 'posed to be the thing that is fun and challenging. takes a serious paucity o' creativity to needs pay somebody extra to give you challenges to makes a $50 fun. HA! Good Fun!

Unfortunately for you, my dried husk of a human, I am a former sports coach and teacher. you is nuts. Gromnir has also coached (american football and rugby) and so we can again smell your crappola. at least tale suggests adding the medal/trophy/token aspect to makes more plausible. and yeah, we is fully aware that gamers does indeed pursue and takes pride in such nonsense. that were the point. identifying challenge fascination as a highwater mark o' gamer absurdity would be pointless if gamers did not actual exhibit the behavior you indicate. duh. HA! Good Fun!

is tough to tell if people is serious when they is speaking absurd. costs millions o' dollars and loads o' man hours from highly skilled individuals to makes a modern video game, movie, tv show or other form o' entertainment. is not possible for Gromnir, or the average gamer, to makes an aaa game. we pay for obsidian skills. we get entertained... usually. so, what skillz is we paying for when we get challenges and achievements? why is an achievement or challenge developed by obsidian any more significant than a vol or gorth created achievement? if mk cannot see a difference, then we will be happy to set up a paypal account so you may subsidize Gromnir's new cottage industry: independent achievements. for a nominal fee, we will create a list o' challenges and appropriate rewards for your eventual success in completing. send you little signed certificates... maybe even some gold stars. isn't that swell? any yutz can create challenges and achievements for a game that already exists. pay some yutz for the right feel warm and fuzzy 'cause we overcame a game computer game challenge? so, the question remains: are you serious? HA! Good Fun!

clarification: keep in mind that wal and tale is coming at this challenge thing from two different directions. wal thinks the challenges is kewl. the fact that josh asks you to do X amount o' damage with a bozar is kewl. tale, on the other hand, suggests that the digital trophy is the lure. ... we don't get either pov, but is worth noting that you is talking different aspects. if gaider had suggested that we should play bg2 w/o using any healing spells, the game would not have been more worthy o' purchase... and if we had actual bothered to complete bg2 w/o use o' healing spells and our interplay/black isle message board account sudden became emblazoned with something likes a military ribbon bar, we woulda' been more embarrassed than proud. we don't get it... and we suspect that most non-gamers don't get it either. HA! Good Fun!

Yes, but not all that many empires actually brought their name to be the common reference for sneaky, intricate, complicated maneuverings - ie; Byzantine we wouldn't read too much into the etymology of a single word in the english language. HA! Good Fun!

eh? what planet are you from? rewards for competition is very real... is why children is taught to seek the Win at early ages. is a primitive and real drive to compete for food, sex, shelter, etc. winner lives. more "advanced" cultures has not genuine changed. the guy with the best test scores and grades gets to go to the best schools. there can be very real and tangible rewards for excelling at sports, and winning in competition is a mark o' excellence. we still compete and gets rewarded daily. maybe is not tooth and nail competition for base survival, but we still compete for sex and money... even in those backwards socialist countries. is just plain sad if completionist trophies is the gamer's substitute for the rational and real rewards o' competition. HA! Good Fun! ps keep in mind that Gromnir is not advocating some kinda ulta-competitive mentality. is extreme unhealthy when everything in a person's life is competition. nevertheless, we thinks it would be a bit myopic to suggest that rewards for competition is irrational.

The Byzantines had a mass of political maneuverings, infighting, backstabbing and general fun and games going on. The Imperial Court, the Bureaucracy, the Nobility, the Soldiers, and that's only keeping to what was happening within the Empire. Take in the efforts of the Persians as neighbours... They also had the cold war and on/off border skirmishes and outright short wars over a few centuries. Something that the Sith Inquisitor should have a good handle on. So therefore, someone with knowledge of how that sort of stuff actually happens.. is more likely to produce an interesting setup then someone who has no clue at all. is tough to recollect an empire that didn't have "a mass of political maneuverings, infighting, backstabbing and general fun and games going on." dunno. Gromnir has almost no knowledge o' star wars old republic lore beyond the bioware and obsidian games, so am not sure how much byzantium parallels the sith. *shrug* IF rebecca is a competent writer, then real life historical influences is unlikely to hurt. she gots a source o' inspiration that might not be available to the average game writer. HA! Good Fun!

Now let's try exchanging the word challenge for trophy, medal, ring, ribbon, or belt. Not only will people pay to try for those things, other people will pay to watch them try. am not certain that this an accurate parallel, is it? use skate park analogy again. try to sell completion medals to kids at the local skate park. you is not giving out medals or trophies for competition, but for completion o' arbitrary tricks. if you pay a fee, you gets a little medal for each verified trick completed. am s'posing this might sell... for 'bout ten seconds. medals and trophies don't mean a heck o' a lot to anybody 'less they is won and exclusive. if everybody gets, then where is the thrill? am s'posing it takes a gamer to see the thrill in wal examples. we beat Joliet Catholic for the sectional championship is a bit different than a digital token for completing an arbitrary game challenge... a challenge created by some developer schnook. HA! Good Fun.

the sad thing 'bout this is that we is certain that you is serious and genuine. try this little experiment: go to a local skate park, rugby pitch or school playground. find a group o' kids engaged in some activity and offer them kewl challenges. even better, ask the kids to Pay for your challenges. just try it. ask a bunch o' skater punks to buy your carefully crafted list o' challenges. let us know what kind feedback you get. the notion o' selling achievements and challenges is a kinda special idiocy limited to the game industry. any other group o' enthusiasts is gonna wanna generate their own challenges, and they surely ain't gonna thinks that a product with such challenges is a selling point worth noting. achievement/challenge mentality o' gamers is freaking nuts. HA! Good Fun!

the above statement is chock full o' gamer's pith. *groan* the challenges is cool? any schnook on this board coulda' posted a list o' "challenges" that would be no less challenging and no less deserving o' a price tag. sure, you get no silly achievement tag if you complete a vol challenge or a goth challenge, but by the same token you would not be asked to pay for a goth challenge. the challenges wal identifies is representing the current high water mark o' gamer absurdity. maybe next obsidian will release a dlc that is nothing more than additional challenges... 'cause they is cool. HA! Good Fun!

am recalling a guy we played ball with in high school. we can still 'member him going into painstaking detail 'bout how he would spend his 100 million dollars if/when he won the lottery. he had plans 'bout how to deal with taxes and how he would choose between lump sum or payments. am recalling he had a car picked out... and not just the car but all the features and which dealership 'n such. would set aside some for college, and some for his mom. he were seriously considering the benefits o' stocks over real estate investments. etc. dork. the guy were a dork. were kinda funny to watch him seriously debate that which were never gonna happen. anyways, for some reason we is recalling the guy from high school who were planning out how to spend his anticipated lottery winnings. HA! Good Fun!

keep in mind that we do not single out bio in this regard. sure, bio has shown that they is complete untrustworthy regarding their Hours Of Unique Gameplay claims, but am certain that folks will recall similar bloated claims from other developers. now that t_cain is at obsidian, it could be amusing to reflect 'pon the claims made by troika regarding their opening vignettes-- those vingettes were 'posed to have considerable gameply impact on the remaining game. *snort* is not bio alone that is making ridiculous claims 'bout unique gameplay experiences, but the canucks has shown that their claims is laughable and should not be relied 'pon. HA! Good Fun!

You mean Dragon Age? that is only the most recent incarnation o' the claim. sure, da: origins was going to lead to unique gameplay for each class/race combo... but those o' us who recalls nwn development can tell you that da:o were hardly the first time bio made wildly inflated claims 'bout the unique gameplay content for each class offering. as hard as it is to believe for anybody that played nwn, that game were also claimed to offer a unique experience for each class. what bio means by unique content is NOT what the average gamer would describe as unique. each time bio makes such a claim, Gromnir cannot help but chuckle. the sad thing is that folks continue to believe in spite o' evidence o' the past. HA! Good Fun!

Given that they have something like 100 hours of unique content for each class (8 total) I think it will last me a good while. perhaps tor will be different, but you may not realize that bio has made virtually this exact same claim multiple times in the past. HA! Good Fun!

admission-- am gonna freely concede that our observations is colored by our personal lack o' anticipation regarding the mp functionality o' me3. no doubt there is loads o' folks who is genuine anticipating the mp in me3, but our desire to use is zero. compare to shale-- even if we had no particular enthusiasm regarding shale, we recognized that we would get use from her as the character and her related quest were part o' the single player game we purchased. on the other hand, assume for a second that warden's keep had been a day 1 offering that were only playable as a co-op mp quest. if warden's keep were mp, then we would never have played.... woulda' been complete superfluous content for Gromnir. if a person purchases a sp game, you can be pretty certain that the individual wants to play a sp game. speaking from personal experience, not every person who purchases a sp game would have interest in mp functionality. that being said, we recognize that our complete lack o' interest regarding mp content very well could put us in some extreme minority. wouldn't be the first time for us to be in the minority. HA! Good Fun!

Objection your honour: strawman argument. Sex, dude. The whole Bond thing was related to how the jedi (or how GL considers the jedi to) see sex. Nothing to do with field work except as it pertained to sex and the sillier Bond's propensity for having it as often, and as casual, as possible. That's the whole point of me agreeing with Raithe's analogy so long as it was the 'sillier' ones, since the most recent Bond movie, in a fit of equally un-Bond like continuity, had him trying to avenge the squeeze who died at the end of the last one which by jedi dictates is bad bad bad. In terms of sex Yoda most definitely appears (semi-official poster art notwithstanding) to fit the M mould of not having it, perhaps never having had it and possibly never even having thought about it except in the context of wanting Bond to stop flirting with Moneypenny. But hey, feel free to draw as long a bow as you like from the comparison, you'll just continue to prove Jaesun right. hardly strawman. you made the comparison 'tween bond and jedi-- but you now add odd limitations. regardless, am seeing your parallel as less tenable now that you has focused. am not certain we can recall a bond film in which the protagonist did not engage in considerable seduction and at least some actual consummation. you yourself note that bond has sex more than mere frequent, no? you is genuine suggesting the the bond stuff is inspirational, but clear the behavior ain't carried over. Gromnir is hardly an expert on star wars canon, but am unable to name a single jedi that would seem to recollect bond's philandering ways. as for motivation behind bond's actions, we has been told in multiple movies that bond gots personal issues related to women 'cause o' past mistakes. his past relations has resulted in more than a few demons and regrets. he acts very emotional regarding the women with whom he has become involved. not only has his casual dalliances failed to shield him, but his painful baggage is 'sposed the reason he don't wish to be involved serious. the jedi code hardly seems a reactionary tool 'cause the jedi in question cannot exorcise old ghosts. 'kinda bass akwards. am honestly not seeing where you goes with the yoda thing. leaders o' jedi order never have sex, and possibly is "never even having thought about it," but the rank and file jedi is hitting studiou 54 like there is no tomorrow. am certain you sees the problem with that, eh? as for the silly jaesun comment... bad cess. by responding to you without agreeing we is somehow exhibiting a character flaw? HA! since you is fond o' identifying logic flaws, perhaps you feel like sharing which category in which to file your most recent flaw. were a horrible (and kinda pathetic) response that does not actual tarnish Gromnir's character as it does yours. HA! Good Fun!