Jump to content

metadigital

Members
  • Posts

    13711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by metadigital

  1. And how does this make you feel? And tell me about your mother ... (You make Kreia sound like a Dalek: genetically modified to remove all emotions except hate...)
  2. Invading from where? A galaxy in another universe?
  3. There are more frivolous reasons. I think there should be LS options to disable the oponent (stasis) and get the experience. Maybe you would get more experience if you killed them, but that would incur a DS penalty. That's more realistic.
  4. Well, if they are part of a recognised civilisation with a sanctioned government then they are prisoners once they are disarmed. Otherwise they are enemy combatants and not must be exterminated. "
  5. Yep, I tend to agree. I just thought I'd mention it because it did take a lot of people by surprise: a lot of people have their games machine isolated from the internet. And it is mindly annoying that it takes about an hour to decrypt every single file after installation. Once it is installed and decrypted you can run it in offline mode, though. They do. And they are probably the ones fragging your arse, too.
  6. Marx, Stalin, and to a lesser extent Lenin, were against organised religion because it represented a potential threat to the authority of the State. That's why Stalin threw all the Russian Orthodox priests in the Glag -- until he needed them to stamp their legitimacy on his doctrine.
  7. I almost laughed out loud at this one. Come on, if there ever was a system that was guaranteed to bring about open warfare, it's libertarianism. Unless the poor all starve to death first and there are robots to do the menial labour, then it should be just fine. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> So you propose some flavour of autocracy? I don't understand. Sure the poor get a raw deal: they always have (and probably always will -- though I do hope for a Star Trek future). The point is the underclasses should have mobility opportunities. (And, more controversially, the rich too: though a fool and his money are easily parted anyway :cool: ) this is seperate from the ability to express ideas without prejudice and live with the minimum constraints possible. That's what I want: no one telling me what to do. (It's pathological. :D )
  8. Continue to let them live in a purposeless world? For what purpose? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> My self-determined purpose is the pursuit of knowledge. No idea what yours is.
  9. I dont think so, I am not going to say gay couples would grow up gay people but it would confuse the child at some point over the sexuality (that is unavoidable) witn makes less preferable as a single person wanting to adopt. Adoption is not (and sould not be) easy, there is a list and a bunch of requirements that dictate
  10. Why I don't like this is the (purposefully or not) implicit notion that homosexuality is a communicable disease: the children will somehow "catch" homosexuality from their gay parents. That is prejudice. Lord knows ( " ) (I spent most of my early adult life in nightclubs, which are de facto immersed in the gay scene (thankfully, otherwise they wouldn't be enjoyable) and I didn't "catch" homosexuality.) And there is another darker corollary to your premise, too: that it is possible to socially engineer homosexuality out of the society. The primary concern for parents is to make sure that their children are happy and capable of living in society and thriving. I understand your issues with the unknown long term effect on the wellbeing of children brought up in non-standard, non-nuclear families; I agree we should be exceedingly cautious about who can adopt children, but I don't see gender as a deal-breaker. (It presents a neat catch-22 impasse: sort of like testing medication of humans; how can you determine if something is safe for human consumption without testing it on them first?) I see good parenting skills as the most important -- and I've seen far too many heterosexual who were poor parents. What we really need is a madatory individually-reversible mass sterilisation programme at birth, with licenced procreation. Now flame that!
  11. Not that I want to start a holy war ( " ) or make an odious comparison, but Hitler's National Socialists received a larger popular vote than Tony Blair's Labour party ... :ph34r: I personally believe that to do a job properly, do it yourself. That means a smaller government. Minimal interference, and none of these pseudo-governmental quangos that seem to be such a fetish for British politics. I can see the depression that will be hitting the UK economy (not that I wish to talk it down) because of Brown's blatant redistribution policies (government regional spending is over 60% of the GDP, as apposed to around 30% in London, for example) and artificial employment (over a million extra middle management government positions since 1997) together with the added tax burden (my tax rate went over 50% after the last election, as a Company Director), raiding the superannuation funds for
  12. There are about a gazillion open source programs around so I would be very surprised if there isn't a firewall and spyware blocker, or twenty. I swear by a hardware firewall -- much better than software firewalls. Never really had a problem with spybots (mustn't be frequenting the same nefarious sites " ). The Micro$oft spy program is apparently pretty good, except it allows all the popups on MSN to work by design. As for firewalls, I too found Zone Alarm impractical. I just use BoG-standard Norton. As I don't use Micro$oft's Outlook/Exchange mail application, I have never had a worm (and Idon't download any executables from email, except by prior arrangement). I also have a redirection mail service filtering my internet email (about US$20 a year) so I get very little spam (Baley's forum posts still get through " ).
  13. That's hardly an indication of any single issue, especially abolishing tax!
  14. So, I guess we have a consensus that the poster of this topic -- and those that share the point of view -- are in need of succour as their self-esteem is obviously lacking. Intelligence does not have a strong correlation to the adoption of religious faith. End of Thread.
  15. People not residing in the north American continent, and younger than a certain age, would probably miss the significance of your remark.
  16. hint hint nudge nudge :ph34r: <{POST_SNAPBACK}> They would probably have to get special permission from LucasArts to do that. So it might happen, sometime in December. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> They could always leave it on a honeypot server with a small ad on a warez site ... " (Or, failing that, on Gabe Newel's pc ... )
  17. No aliens, though. I quite liked "The Man who Ruled the Universe" (early Alan Dean Foster novel -- not writing a novelisation of someone else's film, for a change). Rcommended reading (a bit like Machiavelli meets Asimov). Interesting socio-political thriller with green tenticular aliens (think Simpsons).
  18. He was a little curmudgeonly in that baby film -- whatever it was called, y'know, the one about IVF?
  19. Ahhhh - playing it through now!!! *Averts eyes*
  20. There are so many different areas of science that corroborate the tenets of evolution that to call the evidence circumstantial is pedantic in the extreme. There is no disputing the general tenets of evolution. all that may happen is the hypothesis may have more detail added over time.
  21. It was pure class warfare, nothing else. All pretence at animal welfare was beneath contempt and credulity. The present government is changing the fabric of the parliaments and the legislature into unpredictable (and unplanned) territory. I fear they are acting on a plan that has as much forethought as their post-invasion of Iraq. And here comes the depression ...
  22. Try jumping: there is this "moon gravity hop" performed by your PC. Also picking up and throwing objects is totally out of context with the physical aspects of the said objects. Ah, memories! *gazes off into the distance thinking of the good times when Duke and Quake ruled the CPUs*
  23. Yep. I'd caution about Steam, though. Steam is used to unlock all the files before you can play the game for the first time: so it is a mandatory pre-requisite that you have an internet connection on your games machine. And the installation process takes a couple of hours (even if you buy it on DVD). Apart from that, it's cool.
×
×
  • Create New...