213374U

I'm not feeling any itching. You use that yourself. Can't get any worse anyway... I'm not sure he was qualified to diagnose mental illnesses. He did have a point, though. We would need an infinite amount of reviewers to try those games and find said "good game". Those reviewers would in turn produce an infinity of reviews that you would have to spend an infinite amount of time reading. Worry not, though. There's plenty of time. Pesky infinites... <_<

Lol freedom

Just don't think about it and you should be fine. "Out of sight, out of mind"...

Can anyone post a link to the standards used when deciding what is a planet and what is not? This is an honest request, by the way. At any rate, I fail to see the relevance of this, beyond the small change to school programs that this change entails. Must be a slow week for news agencies...

Abortion. C. And I stand by those choices. When making a decision, one can't base the choice on a marginal statistical possibility. Also, I'm well known for my fascistoid idiosyncrasy anyway, so...

Or, for advanced users, you do both*. * No refunds.

Is it ok if I do it inside my home or do I have to get outside? Also, do I have to fall on both feet? Please consider these questions, I wouldn't want to doom the world by doing it wrong. And I'm sure neither would you.

Witty. Anyway, H-B, old boy.

What do you mean, NWN2?

I only dance when my judgement is severely impaired due to a high degree of intoxication. And by then, trying to pull any of those would only result in me kissing the floor. EDIT: Also, for advanced users only. clicky.

My Radeon 9600XT 128 runs it just fine in a more than satisfactory level of detail and no slowdowns to speak of. I don't even have a gig of RAM either. The game is truly a marvel of code optimization.

I saw this on the boards front page... I think I felt my brain break.

Hades - may I suggest a change of avatar: Hitler was democratically elected as well. It doesn't matter if they got 100% of the votes, or if God himself appointed them as rightful rulers of that land. What they are up to is against the interests of those who have the big bucks. Which means they'll get their asses handed to them time and time again, until they freaking knock it off. And quite frankly, I don't have a problem with that. Sorry. The world doesn't work like that. It can't work like that, either. You are proof of that, yourself, sitting on your comfy chair, ranting on the internets, and making your purchases at Wal-Mart (or similar). So, there. Fortunately, you don't. You do have the ability to end your oh so excruciating pain, though. It's not against the rules to post complete nonsense, but I think you were warned against advocating genocide. So, watch it.

Yeah, well. I was being sarcastic, if you couldn't tell. I believe that at the end of Silent Assassin, it's established pretty clearly that 47 is a killing machine, plain and simple, and that it's pointless for him to fight what he is. This is not to say he doesn't have any feelings (as illustrated in his relation with Diana), but those just don't operate in the same level as those of a "normal" person. He was, after all, genetically engineered with a single purpose in mind. Again, your opinion is that of an unlicensed Mr. Nobody, just like mine. I do not believe that a (even slightly) emotional 47 would be coherent with what we have seen thus far in the games, but hell, they even made the goddamn Terminator look like Father of the Year so he could be the central figure in the movie.

There goes the neighborhood.

Word.

No, actually D's build is wrong for 47. He's a bit too short, and much too muscular. If they could get Statham to shave his perennial 3-day beard, he would be the man for the movie. I don't have anything against Vin, by the way. I like Pitch Black quite a lot, and even enjoyed The Chronicles of Riddick (yes, I actually admitted to that). It's just he's not the first person that comes to mind when talking about 47.

With a bit of luck, this will spread, and people will get word of it. At least Zizou will get that. I doubt that's enough to have Materazzi punished by FIFA, and at any rate, it'll be too little, too late.

You forgot: Must not be made by Bethesda.

Give it time. If it's garbage, it'll eventually be dismissed as such, and it'll go the way of the aether.

This question only makes sense in basic, euclidean geometry. There are other accepted geometric models, which you are obviously unaware of. Euclidean geometry is probably the most "intuitive" one, but is a tad outdated, and wholly insufficient when dealing with problems more complicated than calculating volumes and distances. The same can be said for any number of natural phenomena we know about only from mathematical predictions, and later, indirect evidence. So, yeah. I guess the weak nuclear force doesn't exist, either. You can do that in your imagination, not in mathematics. I'll leave the implications of that for you to deduce. He said "maybe". You see, it's pointless to try and explain quantum physics to somebody that can't properly solve an integral (this is just an example, I'm not making any assumptions about Kafty here), and so on, and so forth. If anyone could be a theoretical physicist, there would be no need for candidates to undergo several years of training in mathematics alone. It's fine for people to have a philosophical take on existance and a cosmogony of their own, but sometimes, that is going to conflict with hard, cold facts provided by science. I know about your little logical loophole that allows you to disregard anything you wish, be it theory or "facts" (I know you will chuckle at this), but for most people, being stuck in a philosophical insufficiency supported by nothing just doesn't cut it. It's pointless to continue the discussion, though. Laozi won the thread in like, page 2: Good ultimatum, since it can't be met. As I assume your defenition of "real" is probably defined by what we can see and experience as humans. As a matter of fact, that's a pretty poor "ultimatum". Alan provided a good example that takes root in our lack of proper understanding of time. But take it a little further, and try and make me a drawing of time itself. You can't draw an electron in 3D. It's just not possible, but you can easily die from having one too many of these little buggers. You can't also draw light, and tell me light doesn't exist. You can't draw cold or heat. So there. The list goes on and on.

Eh? I remember discussing this stuff with you but I don't remember the arguments exactly. Must've made you quite mad if you still remember everything in such detail... heh. No. Italy attacked a lot during the first half, but only because they were losing. Once they got their equalizer, they fell back and let their magic defense do their stuff. I had really hoped they would play as they had in their last matches, but it seems the perspective of winning the world cup reverts them to their "primal self". France kept up the pace, but they were unlucky. And, there's this guy called Buffon, too. Also, I'm surprised nobody mentioned that second penalty they were robbed of. Yeah. Kinda reminded me of Klose's style... lol @ berserk Zidane.

Playmates these days...

It's a great source of games, though.