What Taks is advocating is not Capitalism, it's small government. Ronnie Reagan was the quintessential trickle down economy president, and at the same time he oversaw the largest increase in defense spending in US history.
It's not important whether the reason for disrupting the natural flow of capital are national interests mixed with ideology as in the cold war, or socialist welfare state programmes that are overtly ideological. The result is the same.
Capitalism is what happens when you take the hands off approach, it's how the world moves, a force of nature. It is neither essentially democratic or evil. You can inject all sorts of notions about how we usually view capitalism in the west for the sake of argument, but it doesn't change the nature of the beast.
Liberalism is ideology based on the free movement of capital, as well as the protection of individual rights, with as little meddling from government as possible. I realize it has come to mean something else in the US, but Taks is still a liberal.