Sarex

Oh please do, support away.

Looks better then the original Mario, to me, but I don't really know I have never been a really good judge of these things.

Somehow I doubt they would bother with this little forum, but hey you never know. And then again, not really.

Certainly better than a master of one. XD (that is how the whole saying goes)

What did I say that was an opinion? I stated facts. That they seem to inconvenience you is another matter. Also, this is a forum where anyone can reply to anyone, but you can be sure that I won't reply to any of your post anymore. With those cameras on it's wings, I am sure an Apache pilot is going to mistake them for a gun and shoot them down.

It looks like the "RED BUTTON" for launching a nuclear missile.

What was the skill called, helium balls?

He was voted in to his position, so yeah I would say so. He was deposed off unconstitutionally, even when they had the chance to do it the right way. What they did instead was chase him off, dissolve the constitutional court and put their own guys in charge. So don't quote the constitution when it clearly doesn't matter.

Do you think what happened in Kiev was constitutional?

The whole situation in Kiev was grossly misreported, none of the executions or tortures were mentioned. Nothing was reported of how organized the protestors were and no news network went in deeper to investigate the situation. They may not be lying, but they are certainly not telling the truth.

15 hours to 100% complete the game.

Finished South Park tSoT, awesome game. I don't even like south park anymore, but I still had a blast with the game. Hoping for a sequel.

Hmmm, I guess you did, though not very clearly. Apologies.

It's not a matter of, if they were justified in removing him or not. It's a matter of there being no elections for a real government, it's a matter of the interim government being comprised of equally corrupt people and mostly it's a matter of the misrepresentation of the people of Ukraine, right now only the western Ukrainians seem to have rights. Please point me to part of your posts that I have been ignoring. 1.Sure 2.As far as I know Russia still hasn't invaded anything, they moved troops to their bases and on the border with Ukraine. As for the masked forces in Crimea, well there is no proof that they were/are Russian. 3.You are again intentionally skipping over the large part of the history of Crimea. The people sent to the Gulags were Crimean Tartars not Ukrainians, as for the Russians, well they were already there. 4.Yes there are, but for Ukraine to do anything to them would be suicide come first winter. So I don't think the Russians are overly worried about that. 5.Ok. I don't see the problem here. Though it is worth mentioning that those bases were there before Crimea was given to Ukraine. I imagine that if Crimea declares independence, the Russians would still pay for those basing rights. 6.The protestors were an organized force, they killed/injured police officer so they were killed/injured back. How they behaved after they won and who they put to rule, show what kind of people those protestors were/are. 7.Not a snowballs chance in hell. Ukraine got played so hard, that it will be decades before they come back(economically) to what they were before the protests. 8.Putin is the best thing that has happened to Russia in a couple of centuries. 9.As I can't provide proof that the protestors in Kiev were professionally trained, so can't you provide proof that those are Russian soldiers. Where have I proven those things?

Very interesting article, looking forward to the continuation of it. What do you find funny there, it is obvious that the protestors in Kiev were trained and it's not hard to point a finger at who trained them. So why shouldn't the Russians do the same.

Size doesn't have anything to do with the ability of a state being independent, also if Ukraine does close down land access (which I seriously doubt they will do) they still have sea access.

If it declares independence from Ukraine it will be much better off, as Ukraine is facing hardship no matter how the situation turns out for them. Could you link the article you read, as I find what you said dubious at best.

PC gamer 90/100

Damn dude, I just got my pie out of the oven...

Well men are stronger and smarter, so we deserve higher paychecks. to get the ball rolling

Putin's insane. Excuse me if I don't believe them, but I guess we will find out if they were telling the truth at 03:00 GMT.

First you said, "wouldnt be easier to just invite them back to Russia and helping them there instead of invading other country", then you said "I would not suggest to move them because ethnicity, but because they invited occupation army into sovereign country. eg - traitors.".

Haha, dude there is no nice way to say this, but you are full of it. That was exactly what you were saying and now you are calling them traitors because your previous point fell flat. If the pro west part of the population wins the elections, which I am still not sure will happen(the election, not them winning), east Ukraine will do what the west did in Kiev and their allies are much closer. What will most likely happen is that Ukraine will split in half, there are too many people for any kind of ethnic cleansing to happen. What you are saying is just wishful thinking. The sad thing is that after all of this is over, Ukraine will be worse off then before the "protests" happened.

Am I writing in Chinese or what. I know what Stalin did, but how does that make what you are suggesting right? You obviously don't know what ethnic cleansing is, here educate your self (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing). It doesn't matter that you are banishing them to Russia, the fact is you are moving people from their homes and property because of their ethnicity. Those people are not there on a vacation, they live there.

So Crimeas history starts with Stalin? Also that doesn't excuse the ethnic cleansing you are proposing.