Ulquiorra

Yeah but for someone that knows a little about biology its dump... I whoud not say anything if it where a "magical" world but in mass efect is more like "highly advanced technology etc" .. in nature it whoud be more possible for a "genderless" species to inpragnete it's self at will ...with no reqire of other parter becouse genderless speciec are genderless for some reason ... and they are not genderless and looking like human females (with octopuss crossover) and evoluve 10000000 years only for a day when first human ...enter them ....(or other alien species) .... For example if Asari where the same but look like Wrex ... Wrex whoud be happy ... not sheaperd .... then why their looking human-like ... ? Only for female/male shepard to have sex twith one if he desire ... He is even better then Norris ... entire alien race evoluve only for one of them to become his mating parter and he dirtoys the reapers ... holly ****t !!!

Yeah i also think that asari was one of the worst biowere writhing. But i think that they wanted to make an alien nynph or driad (and magical woman race that atact people) but in the end we get an anlien that can be impregnated by "thinking" or "mental conaction" ... with is ... dumpest and most unlogicat think i ever heard...

Secoundly i think that we encounter not only companions during game. So whats the difrence between having romance with npc that is companion or npc that is not ? I think that having a romance with not companion npc that is important to a story for example "princess of foreign kingdom" or "Woman Archmage that maneges mages gulid" etc .. is not to bad .. Secondly if they inpum a part when your love is "kidnaped" by bad guys when she is non companion npc you don't get -1 companion but if she is you will have at some time less one companion .. Secoundly i wish that not only main evil and companion npc will be significant to a storyline/plot so ...

I agree with you but not intaierly. This game is clased based so fore some classes that are combat oriented combat is part of rpg. I fighter and barberian shoud almost allways end up fighting with someone .. so we can't turn battles complatly .. But for rouges, mages, priests etc i agree with you that combat is not most important. The most inportant for mages is to learning new way of magic, spells or simple get more knowledge .. for rogues it is simple gaining more gold be all mean .. but also fight for fighters so ...

I think that quest shoud not only have difrent way of solution based on class abilitis but alco there shoud be some quest that you coud take only if you have specific class. A for example "grinding" quest to kill 15 wolfes/ wywerns for ranger. Quest to kill 10 bandits for fighters but for example creating new type of spell for mages. Makeing new type of trap or stealing some gold from a noble men for rogues. In woud not be something werif if hunting oriented ranger hunts animals/ monster. Fighter is exeptic chalanges etc. But it schoud also be quest more realated to base class. A fighting undead or healing qounded people for priests/ paladins etc ... it coud be another way to make game deeper and more difrent based on class ...

Mayby they can and i give you credit that this "can" be possibly becouse of asexualiti, or sexual difrences or wery deep deeep form or friendship. But still i don't get a point with "jumping intu a bed" or "jumping on a bowner" type of logic ... the sexual act between two people who love ech other is not just "get laid" becouse their horny ... A sexual act between two loving people is another way to show your love to ech other. So beisaclu two people that are atracted to ech other, are deeply in love and don't have other issues like "rape victim" or other things. Their will do what thay can to show their intrests and their love. With in that case sex is just another part of shownig another one that you love him/her .. and it complatly difrent then sex between two people that don't love ech other.

And what do you think about dragon age orgins atributes ? all of them have base 10 then they have racial bonus + for aglity for elves and then some point to spend ...

What you dont like barbecue ? I love them hehe

I think it's good idea. Regardless if your companions are your friends or only mercs ... they need to eat sleep, drink and other thing to survive. Not mentioning they whoud like to party or make some fun from time to time .. so it all gives costs ...

This is friendship and recpect not "love". Od course there is something like "familly" love, you can love someone even if he/she is not blood related but this is more like friendship+ respect + platonic love. Secoundly if you have a boy and a gril and they both "love" ech other and their both have something like "sexual desire". So they can love ech other normally and have sex or they can love ech other platonicly and taking theirs ugres them selfs (i know that you know what i mean) ... with in you opinoin is more likely ? Im not sure if im getting you right .... you say that platonic is deep but love with sex is shallow ?! Sorry but only difrence beteen romantic with sex love and platonic is that in first their both desire ech other and have sex .. nothing more... Meyby you referring to some kind of homance or "sex friends" relationships .. in that case i can agree but in this two there are no love involved (or not to much) but mostly lust, sex and desire ... with is also normal.. mayby not deep... but normal .. a shallow relationships (if theire any) if their occur in reality their also good Yes for example sherlock holmes was asexual But as a good example he NEVER lovel romanticly any one, only Irene Adler was a woman who he "admire" or "recpect" .. but he don't love her ... Of course there are asexual people on the planet but how many are them ? if 1 to 100 then i whoud be suprised .... And i must say that your reasoning is so deep im drowning ... In you logic sex=shallow .... I mey agree with you if PE was eroge when sexual scenes are at least 40% time of the game .. but in this cas when we are talking about more romantic love + sex not sex + romatic love (witch is much difrent) so i don't see the point .. The only thing that platonic love and sex + love is difrent is that in secound characters have sex (becouse their are sexual and honest about them selfs) and i don't see how it is makeing them "shallow"

?? Josh has already confirmed there's going to be minimal level scaling if at all. I'm really not sure what level cap has to do with level scaling, btw. If your playing game once more with a character at 20 lvl it whoud be silly to fiight the same monster and the begining that has 1 lvl or 2 level ... the same as it whoud be silly t fight a monster that has 90 lv when yours is 30 or 40

Im a big fan of gothic type of atributes. You have all at for example base 10 and by gaining levels you decide witch of those you shoud sped ...

I don't know all the answers, we are simply two gamers talking about a possibilitis in PE. I think this idea is good. But if devs decide it's bad i will live with that (this is their game not mine). But i also get pissed of by those who still saying "resourses, reasourse !!!" ... their not acting as players. ... their more consernt of money and manpower then devs .. We as the fans, games and common people shoud have fantasies and wishes .. also some opinion what we like and what we not .. the resourses is not are deal .. it's devs deal ..and regardless of our opinion they will do it their way ... I think that newgame+ is good addon to the game becouse is coud open new content that can be limited at first time .. and thats all ... thank you ps. about the role playing side, starting as 20 lvl fighter coud open new gameplay. dofrend from zero to hero but from hero to more hero etc ..

mcmanusaurIt all depends on game mechanics, with most of you assume it will be simillar to BG, but we don't know it for sure. The newgame+ coud be a new expierence even not from dificulty level but also for example in a forest that goblins atected you, in newgame+ you are atacted by demons .. Even begining of the game can be difrent ant first you play is say "a man who was just a commoner" but at second (strating from 20 lvl) it coud be "he was an excelent fighter among men" etc ...

The level cap it's in my opinio a mistake if you enemys are scaled to you level ... you can even be at 10000 lvl and still ca have eneymys that can overpower you ...

I think druid shoud more resable to shapeshifters .. wild mages and animal sorcerers then "piersts of nature" ... Druids in reality was not praing to the plants a mushrooms but more for moon and sun .. secondly there made bloody rituals killing people for secriface for gods ... They more risemble an shaman (african, slavic, germanic and other before christianiti) then "magical protectors of the wood" ... sigh

I even think that this is more like all content at once dilema vs not all content at one dilema

In reality i don't see an option for plationic love unless it's one sided or "child love". Tell me .. can you see 100% platonic love relationshipbeteen two people that have more then 18 years old and both of you know of feeling you have for ech other and you realy "love" one another ? In reality this is domething like sexual frustration (for both genders) so if you love someone .. it whoud be soo strange to make him feel good ? ( and you by the way ) Im only talking about reality now .. i don't want sex scenes in PE ... only a evindence that something like this occurs ... this is not porno

That's like saying "what if they could make the game more AWESOME at no cost whatsoever? Would that be AWESOME or what?" You know someone can be agins it becouse he want to take all content at first time and no wait til the second ... so this isin't simple Awsome or more Awsome dilema ...

Ok so... I think that new game + feature is not only when you "import" you pervios character. It may also incloude new game with a new character but with new content (that was close at first play). But if a lets say character level you can gain in campain is 50 and maximum amout is 100 then: 1. importing a new character can open addicional quests for example "kill demon lord" witch was waaay to stong at first play thru ... 2. If you are playing first time and at the end you shoud have big knowladge about the world it's self so there can be adden a special quest or content that has decisions that requaire high knowladge about the world/ fractions etc not only infloramiont like "the red onees are good, the black ones are bad". 3.By importing you previos character you character can gain other abilitis or grown his own better, also some opitons of quest ending etc can be opend ... The reson is simple, if a game has a level cap 50 for example and you want t gain more an fight stronger enemys that was even way stronger there can be an "Expansion" or "new game +" or two of them ... this also include addictional adventure ... Secodly lest take dragon age orgins + awekening. I whoud like to play ones and finish orgins .. and at the secound playtru play orgins+awekening as newgame+ but more polot related ... in my opinion it whoud be better to put an adictional advantures IN main plot like Gothic 2 night of the raven then adding an adventure that takes part after the ending ..like mask of b for NWN2 ... why ? Becouse Mask was desined for only one ending .. other ending were put aside so players who for example asside with King of Shadows was forced to play an addon for "good characters" .... And i think that adding a content of mask inside a nwn2 oficial campain whoud be much better ... That what im thinking ..

That's saying "if they had unlimited amounts of time, money and manpower". If they did, I'd be fine with the feature being there, still wouldn't use it, but I wouldn't mind it either. But they don't have unlimited resources. 4 million budget is not even 40 million. There'll be lots of questions to the tune of "this would be a kind of a neat feature, but is it worth the effort?" Stuff will be cut no matter what. Beliewe me adding an option to play you character onec again is not that expencieve. New quests/events/endings etc whoud probably cos more becouse of "writhing" part. Still i don't get this obsession about reasorces ... the first goal to create the game was 1 million .. we have 4 times more .. so by their calculations they shoud be able to create 4 games with the basic content. So the game will be 4 times bigger then at the begininng. the 40 milion games are those like Starcraft2, Dragon age orgins(with DLCs) or mass effencts .. im not preaty sure about witcher 2 ... And the most of the "money" went on marketing, graphics/animation cutscenes, voice acting ... we know in PE none of these will be as "important". Secondly, im starting to think that you guys are more concern of "recorces" then devs .. with is weird ... The dragon age or mass effect where so expencive becouse those game was almost non-stop cutscenes ... witch PE will be not .. But talking with you guys about recources is just waste of time .. becouse even talking about "adding" new type of weapon you will see as possible dangerous situation ... sigh ...

I see you guys don't understand the question. I sad if they "HAD" resorces. Im also aginst it if they don't but my qiestion was about if thay have proper reseroces and other elements will not suffer from this ..

Are you for or are you aginst New Game + Feature ? For those who don't know, New Game + feature meant starting a new game (from begining) exporting a character that you previosly end the game. We seen this type of Feature for example in Mass Efect where you can import a character at level you previosly end the game. Of coure NewGame + feature does not mean that you must inherit your levels, you coud for example inherit items but also start once again with addictional events ... In BG we have "Export" character option but it isin't newgame+ option ... The new game+ option is when you end game and your character is saved for new play thru, OR simple ending of the game unlocks new opitons during second play (this also may include other characters)

If he was one that helped made fallout NV .... Then.

D&D spellcasting and rest spawning was propanly one of reasons i never played mages to much. In nvn1 for example a mage before 8 level almost after every combat shoud be resting. a fighter rest only when his hp is low so ... the energy/mana/stamina system is better in my opinion.