Ulquiorra

You know dragon age orgins was only and example and propably BEST made orgins ever .. but not to many orgins was made so far so ... No it PE will propablz not have drunk mode .. but if it does ... witcher or fable mode was best ... in these two i cant say they where made 100% good .. but best so far ..so ..

I also think that some thing shoud be lerned from other games. Gothic 2 night of the raven Problablz one of the best made fractions the best was mercs. also crafting system. Fallout NV Also well done fractions Kamidori Achemist Masiter This is a Eroge BUT in this game zou are also shop owner and craftsman, propablz best made shop owning simulation and simple economisc made in games. Final Fantasy 7 For characters and main plot Witcher 1 Also plot and main character but also minigames ... not mentioning the best DRUNK simulation ... Dragon age orgins For orgins .. the best ones was Dwarv Noble and human Noble also citz elf was good ... Skyrim God werewolf simulation, and open world also crafting system. Jade Cocoon Propablz noone know this game, this game was like crosover beteen pokemon and final fantasz this dark athmosphere, more mature. Plot was simple and linear, but i donąt know ... this game had so friking athmosphere i remember it to this day ... Vampire Masquarade Bloodlines For dark world, characters and main plot ... of course i did not mention BG BG2 and planscape and all DD games. and at the end Fable 1 Becouse of zou character develobment, your character gain muscules if he was madeing progess in fighting stylez, and change your apierience based on your actions ... damn even if you get slahed by sword you got a scar ...

And you think that people made couples becouse sex of teen romances from entire time ? You think that 2 people can't be in "love" or deep relationship witch sexual desire with not going to "bawdy house". If you think so then i deeply sorry for you ... and let me have this irrational illusion ... you got fire ball i got romance

I'm pretty neutral on the romance thing, I think this is the first time I've looked at this thread....however, this always makes me laugh 362% on kickstarter of what they actually wanted to make the game, plus whatever they've made since...people are tripping over themselves to hurl money at obsidian, as well as other studios like inxile and double fine, yet every suggestion is always met with "Nooooo...limited resources" it just seems to be an excuse to try and stop them adding a feature you don't want. I know they are not limitless, but how much do you think they need? $10million? $1billion? .....they didn't seem to think so Yeah i agree. We have resorces for godlikes, ciphers, chanters, paladins, stronghold, second big big city and enchanted musics and extra dungeon ... but we have no for 1 good optional romance .. is it just me .. or is this .. dumb ?

PrimeJunta Yes but pro-romancers never said "i want romance so don't make something". Pro-romancers just say that 100% logical and living character will also romance. They like romance the same as you like talking or make other interactions to a npc/ praty member. So they want it to. But if obsidian someday whoud say "we cut of agression or hatered in game becose it's egostroking" im sure you whoud feel disapointed. for me i whoud much more like few types of armor/ weapon simple gameplay and fully made characters (with love, sex, hate, and other traits) becouse the characters made a STORY and PLOT ... not the issues if your grandmother has hell spawn or do you have longsword +3 or stronghold .. Your conclusion aboud Obsidan romances is tru BUT not becouse the characters like elanee was 100% finished .. becouse she was not. Safiya was good in my opinion but not the best. Secodnly this isint a discusion "have 100% realistic character but no romance or 80% of character + romance" becouse if we cut dawn romance there will always be 80% of character with 20% of their brains cut down (and other organs). The game is not only for buffying up your stats or leveling up. The part of role play is the most important. If i want to creae a character that is womanizer or simle guy that is seeing boobs everywhere .. and you cut dawn options to romance i will never take 100% expierience of playing my type of character .. This is even worst then "we will not have mages becouse magic is egostroking" and im sure if they whoud cut down magic many players will never play this game (with is bad if anyone is couting on PE 2) ..

Yeah but for real he can be angry on god of nature becouse he don't look like other people so .. it's quite possible ... Like half-demon hunting demons with we seen 100 already .. so ...

Yeah there are some people/ cratures/ baing that will not have sex like this guy : But if you look like this : And in you party is a chick like this : And she is intu you there is no posibilitty then "Don't" have sex. This mayby one night stand this mayby romantic love but if 2 atractiv and free people meet ech other ...you know what happen ... I you have this type o chick in you party and she was intu you whoud enyone (beside gay people) turn her down ?!

Falling in "love" isint a crime. I agre that in JRPGs where romances that where not good or iritaiting. But JRPGs are like Anime, there are awsome animes and silly ones. I watched harem animes that have 8-12 girls falling in love with some kid that is bringing nothing to the table. But i also seen romances where a partagonist was a character that whoud EAT 12 this kind or boys with i move .. (im talking about personality not power). Still even if this is biowere romances i whoud still live and play them ... The worst romance i ever seen was Elanee romance from NWN2. Even lesbian/ alien cross romance from Mass Effect 1 was better ... sigh ...

What a race that is officionaly confirmed or subraces that also are confirmed ?

motorizerIf you don't want to play "magic" user then why you want to play a game where magic is everywhere ? from what i heard in PE even fighter will have special abilitis to cover their "uber human" powers. The same for mages .... I sudgest you to play GTA or mass effect as a solider ... in fantasy setting magic is in everything even in enchanted swords ...

hahahahahahahaa that has good .. so what ... if develeopers made a cows and chickens in game so what they need to ERN they place in game ? Godlikes, elves, dwarwes, ogres, aumauamamuama race and other are in this game becouse obsidian discovered they whoud like to made them .. is there enything that gives them more rights to be in this game ?

That is your opinion, which I find (no offence) rather black&white. Why shouldn't a mage have a castle from which to operate, complete with soundproof torture chambers laboratories, a state of the art tower from which he can curse enemies that are still two days' worth of marching away, etc? He might even use it as a front, to pose as a run-of-the-mill nobleman, to hide his wicked ways - or he might, if he was of the "Hug the trees!"-persuasion, use it as an orphanage to help those less fortunate than (or maybe just as unfortunate as he was) himself. Just because you would never play a mage whose aim or even interest it might be to become a land owner, or to have a stronghold to whatever means they see fit, does not make it an obvious truth. So, in short... I do respect your opinion, I just choose not to share it - how about you adopt the same method and next time just say that you don't like that idea and that you don't think it plausible for any other class than a fighter - instead of just claiming it to be obvious and undeniable. It is merely a question of preference and choice, and as (nearly) always in such matters, there is no right or wrong. Mage and warrior have no real issues for "not having big stronghold". But if "stronghold" meant always "castle for noblemen" it don't suits barberian, druid and propably priest and monk classes. WHY ?! Barberian can have stronghold, but he will never become "nobleman" so he will have wilderness in his heart for whole his life, he can conquer stronghold and make his own clan or even invite his own and become cheaf. BUT Druids will never participate in human politics, and strongholds. Becose if druids are nature worshipers then they will be offendet by useing wood and stone for strongholds not mentioning they like more woods and wilderness then noble partyies and politics. Secondlu a monks and priests also can't have strongholds. The only possibiltity if the strongholds becomes "property of the order" and they are assined to menaging it. In normal medieval societies a common priest have no real posession all meaning posessions like castles, strongholds and land where automaticly taken by an order ...

1. The first games in D&D setting that had romances was BG 2 and Torment. 2. Biowere "optional" romances and all "D&D" type of romances where created long after first romances in games for example in most jrpg's like final fantasy. 3. We all know that in this side are almost no-one from "Biowere romance fanboys/girls" This forum is stricty anti-biowerish so jo implication is not good. 4. The funny thing is that the most og "biowere" romance hater are people that never played then (so why even you know they where bad ?) 5. MCA is not only writher for example Zient helped create the romance from NWN2 Mask campain and whoud be good writher for that. 6. If some writher dont like writhing about humans interactions in general or even talking (for example like to write combat narration or other narrated events) does it mean that in game shoud be none talking to a companions ? 7. The most funny thing is that nobody mention Jrpgs romances they where better then western and they had been in this type of games way before western (like biowere) romances.

You found it unrealistic that someone could develop a romantic interest in someone else and not immediately have sex with them? My opinion is roughly the opposite of yours. No I found it unrealistic that person could traverse the planes, meet alien creatures, kill demons, discover he is immortal but somehow not have sex with a party member who is inextricably linked to him and he is attracted to Your character can be atracted but she may be not. But still it whoud be almost imposible for character meets aliens, demons, dragons, killed 10 00 000 00 orcs saved world at least 2 times and still had never meet any chick (even outside the party) thet he is atracted to (and so is she)

You know beside fights i think that project eternity will also have some role playing part of the game, this isn't diablo 3.

If you are talking about me then by this moment you trolling me, trilling is provocation to piss someone off, is my thread aboyt posibilitis of godlike race in eternity is pissing you of ? If it is then 98% of therds on this forum is trolling

It depends on how they gonna be like at the end of the "makeing game" process. If they are nothing more then randomicly selected by goods fenomena and beside look and powers they don't have any real association to the gods then propably no ... But if for example will be obligated to some kind of other traits like "elemental-like" are more argessive, or holly like like lawfull good then mayby yes. I personaly whoud love to se some kind of non-typical godlikes that are not made by gods but revange spirits or other dark ghost like reaper. When i whoud like to play it i whoud like to play as cursed creature that has feeling like other humans but fight hi "reaper" menality ... for example to kill everyone in the room ... i whoud be awsome if i whoud have that kind of "original" gameplay if selecting godlike .... I personaly whoud not like the idea "more buffed humans with horns" becouse mayby they are stronger and more buffed then normal humans but also they shoud need some disadvantages like "holly likes fight their servant menatlity" or "helllikes fight their sadistic killer inpulses etc" ...

Like above what type od "godlikes" whoud you like to see, and what sort inspiration whoud you like to see for that race ? We know that goodlikes (at least one of them) will risemble navi with deer crossover ...

I like the idea of investments but not only from buying buildings or upgradeing them, but also them economical point of view. For example one week passes and you need in you inventory 10 pecies of some food or your companions whoud die, the same for water, bot also if you are find a "garbage items" from exploration or other metarials you coud make something that costs more and sell it ...

Im not sure but i think that everything will have some kind of soul but propably (for example animals) will have something like lesser lesser souls .. but im almost 100% that enemys like lich, banshees, demons, etc will also have soul and even propably bigger stronger then normal humans, the soul system in eternity and whole (bigger, smaller) souls are propably to some kind of justyfication that some people have power to kill dragons and others not. Secondly the soul system is relevant to magic users, so if we encounter a monster that will have magic he will propably also have soul .. at least thats what i think is logical ...

Just... grow up. Please. You see, being inmature and "growing up" is a matter of time, but when it comes down to lack of inteligence like in your case it's not so easy ...

hmm... The most funny part is that the Wticher bring something "new to the table". Witcher is bringing you to a dark corupted world where humans can be as cruel as monsters. Witcher did it better then all DA series and arcanum combined becouse that was not "addon then gives some dark elements" like in DA series but an part of a world. Witcher are inspired by a book series writhen by Andrzej Sapkowski. Racism and sexism was the part of that world. So tell my HOW whoud you make a game inspired on BOOK series and ignore the major part of that setting ? We whoud have another resident evil with milla jovovich more riseble to matrix with zombies then original resident evil. About "vampirize another interesting subjects", your completly wrong if you aplaying it to the witcher 1 (i dunno about 2) becouse beside this "dark and corupted" part of the game we have also "beatufill, fantastical and postitiv elemtents". even funny elemtent for time to time. 1,2 and 3 are pretty dark, 4 act is a lighter and more "fairy taleish" 5 act is popadly the darker ... but in 2 and 3 we have not only dark elements but also positiv and funny ... so if game is giving you the wole spectrum of elements then it's just "LIVING WORLD" ... where we have dark, light and even something gray. I arge witch you if you applying it to Dragon Age settings becouse there the whole "racism" and "dark" elements where simple addons to make game more mature ... Dragon Age whoud have potential if EA was not involved becouse EA are pushing desiners to make games as childish as possible.

Im for it. The best sexism and racisn in game was propably in Witcher. Women where there only to one purpuse for most men, and elfes where day by day atackt by humans that hated them .... In DAO they TRIED to do something like that (elven servants etc) but it stopt when they even started. Propably becouse of EA who are makeing games as childish as possible so ...

If whole game whoud look like redclif (expecionaly the saige stage) most of the players whoud throw this game out of the window. Becouse this quest is annoying if you don't have good healer. Upgrated peasants stand only few seconds longer then not upgrated. My team only whoud propably do better whout those peasnats. I personaly think that the best ype of the quest was orzamars deep roads becouse it was one of the darkest in game secondly the orzamar main quest was ... good. Becouse you whoud have diftent opinion (who shoud be my ally) depending on your orgin. If you whoud start as dwarwen commoner you whoud allly youself to "evil" prince but if you had the "dwarwen noble" orgin you whoud propably go for narrowminded but good "haromont" (i don't remeber his name) the best part of that quest is that you can't complate this with usual "Happy end" both solutions have good sides and down sides ...