Nick_i_am

Yeah, that wouldn't cause any friction.

I'd think in a case like that, the government would be allowed to intervene.

And if it is broke, pretend it ain't.

If it's just 'telling' then you're back on the irony boat.

It's a valid point to make, the only point that I was making is that, whatever the benefits of allowing innocent people to own guns are, there will still be a few bad apples who (probably) wouldn't have been able to get hold of guns otherwise, but will still misuse them. I'm not saying that it overrules all the benefits, just that it's somthing that needs to be taken into account, possibly with better safeguards against just this type of incident.

I think everyone is entitled to an opinion on a hugely complex issue that effects different people in different ways. Then again, I enter discussions to hear and form new ideas, not to try and convince everyone that my ideas are the only ones which are right. Just saying.

Irony from captain socialism.

Some nerd sent me copies of Contra 4 and Front Mission DS which were never made available in the UK. So yeah, those.

Nerdar went off the chart, stopped reading.

I'm neutral on gun lesislation but the volo logic reads like this. Upstanding citizens should have access to guns. Criminals shouldn't, but will get them via criminal means. Spree killers arn't upstanding citizens, but arn't criminals either, so where are their guns coming from. Answer is, the same place as the guns of upstanding citzens, either bought themselves or from friends/relatives. Which means, logically, that if upstanding citizens didn't have access to guns, then neither would spree killers unless they resorted to criminal means. There are lots of arguments against gun legislation, but this is not one of them. Just saying.

Begging for mercy in my pants.

They're not hardened criminals who have access to gun smuggling rings either.

Do spree shooters generally have any kind of criminal record prior to the shooting?

In retrospect, switching that on at work was a bad idea.

Only the demo. Quite amusing.

I'll ignore you in my pants!

And people who go on gun rampages because they're pissed off and have easy access to guns.

Or the least expencive Blu-ray player!

Brace for Taks rage.

Your mum. buuuuurn

The land of Awesomeness is in my pants.

Console piracy is rampant in my pants.

It's pretty funny when people argue so bitterly over semantics then use completely generalised terms like 'best'.

It's funny because it's true.

Who?